Zcom_simple

Hello,

Blogs are a familiar feature on the internet - where users post content in an accumulating manner, with comments, and search options, etc. They facilitate expression and exploration, and via attached comments, also debate and synthesis.


Reading and
Navigating Blogs

Our blogs are quite powerful. Each writer can post, as is typically the case. Sustainers who have the option can also post, however. All Blogs appear in the blog system, and sometimes also in content boxes the top page of ZNet - and always via the left menu of the top page - and can be found via searches, etc.

Commenting on blogs follows the blogs, attached at the bottom, and blog comments, like all others, are also visible in many places that show comments including in the forum system. In addition, the entire blog system gathers content for everyone - but one can look at the accumulating content in many ways.

  • For example one can look at one writer's efforts - so one is seeing what is effectively a blog system for that one writer, or Sustainer.
  • One can also look at the content by topic, seeing blogs that are tagged as being about a certain topic - or place, as well. Thus, when doing that, it is a blog system about a topic, or a place, with many contributors.
  • One can look at only writer blogs, or only sustainer blogs, as well.
  • One can look at blogs for particular Groups, too.

All this is easily done using the left menu. Searches allow even more variables and refinements.


Creating Blog Posts

If you are a Sustainer with permission, and are logged in, you will see a link in the left menu for you to post a blog - and you can use that to post one, and then tag it various ways (such as with a topic or place, or a group tag), and once you do, it is in the system with you as the author.

You can also use the console button to the left to post a blog - anytime and from anywhere in the site, as long as you are logged in.

Meanwhile, enjoy the blogs - and, by the way, if you are a Free Member or a Sustainer with a ZSpace page, of course you can put one or more content boxes on it, pulling blog links of any sort you may want to filter for, for example, by you or by your friends or by others - and by topic, about places, for groups, etc.

Blogs

678691

Roger Bybee's Blog

Web Address: http://www.zcommunications.org/zspace/rogerdbybee
Bio: I've recently been invited  to write a twice-weekly blog in In These Times, appearing Tuesdays and Thursdays (go to www.inthesetimes.com and flick the In These Times Working link at the top of... (More)

All Bybee Blogs

$3 trillion in income shifted upward

By Roger Bybee at May 07, 2010


Change Text Size a- | A+

Disparity Between Productivity and Pay: $3 Trillion a Year

Friday
May 7
12:37 pm
 

By Roger Bybee

The growing economic polarization of America is increasingly obvious, if not a major topic of discourse in mainstream corporate media.

As Les Leopold notes in The Looting of America, the richest 1% of earners collected 8% of national income in 1973. "By 2006, the top 1% got nearly 23% of the pie, the highest proportion since 1929, " he writes. Moreover, the richest 1% now earns more than the bottom 50% of Americans. During almost exactly the same period, the pay gap between the top 100 CEOs and workers rose from 45 to 1 in 1970 to Himalayan proportions in 2006, reaching 1,723 to 1, Leopold says, citing data from Forbes.

But one of the most significant and least-discussed elements in the stunning polarization of America is the extent to which rising productivity has become unhitched from the way that its rewards are distributed.

PRODUCTIVITY UNHITCHED FROM WORKER PAY

Leopold lays out the astonishing data on this disparity:

By 2007, real wages in today's dollars had slid from their peak of $746 per week in 1973 to $612 per week--an 18% drop. Had wages increased along with productivity, the current average wage for nonsupervisory workers would be $1,171 per week--$60,892 instead of today's average of $31,824.

Our real average compensation is now about $25 per hour, including all benefits, representing a small increase from the early 1970s [in part created simply because of the sharp rise in health costs.] If it had risen along with productivity, it would be more like $41 an hour. The productivity bonus--about $16 an hour--is still AWOL.

Over roughly the same period, the ratio of household debt to income went from 55% to 127%, as Americans tried to make up for the loss of real wages with increased use of their credit cards.

American families have found themselves with vastly reduced time off the job, losing vacation days, sick time, and other leave. Until the recession hit, we were working the longest hours in the world.

So although we are producing more, working longer hours (if we are working), and have taken on unsustainable levels of debt, working people are falling further and further behind. The number of home foreclosures, for example, is expected to go from 2.8 million in 2009 to 4.5 million families losing their home in 2010.

$3 TRILLION SUCKED UPWARD TO INVESTOR CLASS

Instead, the additional income generated by US workers has been redistributed upward. That means about $3 trillion more flowing each year mostly "to the investor class all over the world, " as Leopold puts it.

There are three chief reasons why the $3 trillion has been sucked upward. First: U.S. corporations have used the threat of relocation to Mexico or China to ratchet down US wages.

Second, millions of Americans have lost the right to bargain over their wages as heavily-unionized  manufacturing plants have been shut down and often relocated in low-wage nations. We have lost 5.6 million industrial jobs--about 32% of the total--since 2000 alone.

Third, the right to form unions has suffered a de facto repeal.  Employers realize that they can intimidate and fire pro-union workers (over 31,000 in 2005 alone, according to State of the Unions author Philip Dine) without repercussions, so an atmosphere of fear and anxiety haunts American workplaces.

Thus, American workers will not even begin to be able to  claim what is rightfully theirs--some $3 trillion in annual income--until the labor movement can crack that sense of intimidation and powerlessness.

PAYOFF FROM POLITE LOBBYING?

With President Obama surrounded by Wall Street believers in trickle-down economics like Lawrence Summers and Timothy Geithner, we should have no rational expectation that more polite lobbying in Washington D.C. will make any difference.

We will neither produce meaningful legislative changes nor break through the fatalism that working people seem to feel so deeply these days.

US labor needs desperately to inspire and support workers at the grassroots level finding leverage over corporate power, whether it be fighting plant closings or resisting foreclosures.

Only when we have successfully exerted some power at the local level, can we hope to command respect (as in, instill fear) and wrench real concessions from the Obama administration and the Democrats in Congress on real job-creation programs, curbing the relocation of U.S. jobs, and restoring union rights.

Loading_border