Zcom_simple

Hello,

Blogs are a familiar feature on the internet - where users post content in an accumulating manner, with comments, and search options, etc. They facilitate expression and exploration, and via attached comments, also debate and synthesis.


Reading and
Navigating Blogs

Our blogs are quite powerful. Each writer can post, as is typically the case. Sustainers who have the option can also post, however. All Blogs appear in the blog system, and sometimes also in content boxes the top page of ZNet - and always via the left menu of the top page - and can be found via searches, etc.

Commenting on blogs follows the blogs, attached at the bottom, and blog comments, like all others, are also visible in many places that show comments including in the forum system. In addition, the entire blog system gathers content for everyone - but one can look at the accumulating content in many ways.

  • For example one can look at one writer's efforts - so one is seeing what is effectively a blog system for that one writer, or Sustainer.
  • One can also look at the content by topic, seeing blogs that are tagged as being about a certain topic - or place, as well. Thus, when doing that, it is a blog system about a topic, or a place, with many contributors.
  • One can look at only writer blogs, or only sustainer blogs, as well.
  • One can look at blogs for particular Groups, too.

All this is easily done using the left menu. Searches allow even more variables and refinements.


Creating Blog Posts

If you are a Sustainer with permission, and are logged in, you will see a link in the left menu for you to post a blog - and you can use that to post one, and then tag it various ways (such as with a topic or place, or a group tag), and once you do, it is in the system with you as the author.

You can also use the console button to the left to post a blog - anytime and from anywhere in the site, as long as you are logged in.

Meanwhile, enjoy the blogs - and, by the way, if you are a Free Member or a Sustainer with a ZSpace page, of course you can put one or more content boxes on it, pulling blog links of any sort you may want to filter for, for example, by you or by your friends or by others - and by topic, about places, for groups, etc.

Blogs

Web

Chris Spannos's Blog

Web Address: http://www.zcommunications.org/zspace/chrisspannos
Bio: Chris Spannos has had over a decade of experience in self-managed media collectives and also as an activist, organizer, and anti-capitalist. From 1998-2006 he participated in the Redeye collective,... (More)

All Spannos Blogs

A Reply to Stephen Gowans

By Chris Spannos at Apr 21, 2008


Change Text Size a- | A+

Below is a reply to Stephen Gowans who, in his blog from March 24, paraphrases me inaccurately based on my reply to an email he sent me. I was surprised to see the blog as I would have thought Stephen would have let me know he was going to use words, that he attributed to me, from our correspondence. When replying, I was not notified that he would be using the email as part of a blog, which would seem appropriate considering he is citing my email to him, without me knowing, to make a larger point in his piece. As I don't agree with how he used my email, I tried, and failed, to post the below response in the comments section of the blog. Perhaps I'm supposed to be a member of the blog system, not sure why my attempt to comment failed, so I am posting here instead. I stand by my reply to his email and so it is reproduced below at the bottom of this blog. I have also emailed the response to him.

 

------------

 

Hi Steve, this blog entry was brought to my attention and I would like to clarify here in this comment section, or for you to clarify yourself in your blog, your email interaction with me and the miss-paraphrasing you use of my reply to you, which is selective of only a small portion, and copied below, in our full exchange, so your readers can judge where any "sophistical defense" may have been used, in either my reply or your blog.

 

You write in your blog above "Z-Net changed Kwinjeh's bio after I wrote to Chris Spannos about it, complaining the omission was deceptive." Indeed you did write and my response was "I agree that Grace's political affiliations should be attached to the commentary, so I've changed her byline to read: Grace Kwinjeh is a South African-based Zimbabwean journalist, political activist and founding member of Zimbabwe's main opposition party the Movement for Democratic Change, (MDC)."

 

You say above that I explained to you: "If Z-Net refused to accept submissions from people who are connected, in some way, to parties or institutions dominated and funded by corporations and imperialist governments, Z-Net would have to dissociate itself from most of the submissions it gets on a daily basis." But these are your words and not an exact quote of mine, nor even a complete paraphrase, which is misleading. My exact words, again, pasted in context of our full exchange at the bottom of this reply, were:

 

"...we regularly publish material by whistle blowers and people on the Left, who are allies, and comrades, who unfortunately are, in one way or another, affiliated with institutions and parties we despise, and in fact this also applies to any university professor too, since they work mostly in institutions who have ties to imperialism and capitalism."..." The article itself seems fine to me. Bond has written for us for many years, and Grace, although I've never met her, never had any communications or contact, there is nothing about the article, or that I see on her blog, that would cause us to disassociate ourselves. If we did that, and were consistent, we'd have to dissociate ourselves from most of the submissions we get on a daily basis. That hardly seems like an effective strategy for us in movement building..."

 

Any reader can see the difference between my full quote and what you miss-paraphrase.

When you wrote, I assumed it was in good faith, and I replied as such. Perhaps I am wrong in my reading of your blog above and your reference to your interaction with me. If so, no worries, and I hope this note clarifies our exchange for your readers. If my reading is right however, I'm content enough with this comment appearing beneath this blog, and no further exchange is necessary, as I'm sure you're just as busy as I am, and there is much more important work at hand.

 

Just below is our full exchange, beginning with my reply to you, and your first email just beneath that.

 

Best,

Chris Spannos

 

 

From: Chris Spannos
Sent: Wed 3/26/2008 12:22 PM
To: stephen gowans
Subject: FW: Patrick Bond's and Grace Kwinjeh's, "Zimbabwe's political roller-coaster hits another deep dip"

Hi Stephen,

I agree that Grace's political affiliations should be attached to the commentary, so I've changed her byline to read: Grace Kwinjeh is a South African-based Zimbabwean journalist, political activist and founding member of Zimbabwe's main opposition party the Movement for Democratic Change, (MDC).

On the other hand, we regularly publish material by whistle blowers and people on the Left, who are allies, and comrades, who unfortunately are, in one way or another, affiliated with institutions and parties we despise, and in fact this also applies to any university professor too, since they work mostly institutions who have ties to imperialism and capitalism.

The article itself seems fine to me. Bond has written for us for many years, and Grace, although I've never met her, never had any communications or contact, there is nothing about the article, or that I see on her blog, that would cause us to disassociate ourselves. If we did that, and were consistent, we'd have to dissociate ourselves from most of the submissions we get on a daily basis. That hardly seems like an effective strategy for us in movement building...

 


From: stephen gowans
Sent: Sunday, March 23, 2008 1:11 PM
To: Chris Spannos
Subject: Patrick Bond's and Grace Kwinjeh's, "Zimbabwe's political roller-coaster hits another deep dip"

Concerning the article by Patrick Bond and Grace Kwinjeh, "Zimbabwe's political roller-coaster hits another deep dip," posted on March 11, 2008, as content available to Z sustainers, http://www.zmag.org/sustainers/content/2008-03/11bond-kwinjeh.cfm :

The article lists Kwinjeh as a South African-based Zimbabwean journalist. A google search of "Grace Kwinjeh" turns up Kwinjehviews, http://gracekwinjeh.blogspot.com/ , a blog by Grace Kwinjeh.  Therein Kwinjeh describes herself as "a founder member of Zimbabwe's main opposition party the Movement for Democratic Change, (MDC)" and also as a South African-based Zimbabwean journalist, the latter description matching the brief bio provided at the end of the article. Presumably, this is the same Grace Kwinjeh who co-wrote the Bond article.

 

Inasmuch as the Bond-Kwinjeh article is highly critical of the current Zimbabwean government, and concerns the upcoming March 29 elections, it, is no insignificant point that:

(1) Kwinjeh fails to disclose her connection to the MDC.  This is tantamount to an IBM employee writing a scathing review of Mac computers and then presenting herself as a technology issues journalist without acknowledging her connection to IBM;

(2) Patrick Bond has a history of promoting "independent" left voices that are hardly independent.         

Since the views of the MDC's are not views one would expect Z-NET to directly promote, and since one would think Z-Net would dissociate itself from a deception, Grace Kwinjeh's connection to the MDC should be fully disclosed in the article.  

On the other hand, if you don't want to be seen as promoting the viewpoint of a political party that has manifold connections to the US and British states and favors neo-liberalism, you might consider disassociating yourself from the article. At the very least, you ought to make plain to readers that the views of Kwinjeh and Bond are not the views of an "independent" left.

 

Stephen Gowans

Person

By Frchristie, Frederic at Apr 23, 2008 12:28 PM

I agree with Chris here. Yes, perhaps adding some of the credentials and associations may be a good idea, but what evidence does Gowans have to prove that this person is an out-and-out shill? Let me make an analogy. Both Michael Moore and Noam Chomsky have commented on which Democrats they think are most likely to pursue causes we like. Mike has gone further to actually endorse candidates. Now, obviously both are very different, Noam being substantially more radical. But to think of either as uncontroversially Democratic "supporters", as in buying part and parcel to all of the mainstream Democratic Party\'s affiliations and interests, would be ludicrous. My perception of the MDC is that its rank and file are a mix, some authentically Left, some progressive, some simply liberal, and some looking for any change whatsoever. We have to make tactical choices, and we need to be very, very careful about our criticisms of comrades and fellow travelers. Gowan has failed to meet his burden.

Reply this comment

Loading_border