Africans in America and the Quest for Identity
As I write this article, I am just returning from my annual visit to the International African Arts Festival in Brooklyn, New York. Founded in 1971 as the African Street Festival by activists associated with the Nationalist organization The East, the four-day cultural extravaganza attracts hundreds of thousands of attendees each year. Similarly, the National Black Arts Festival in Atlanta, which also occurs in July, has grown into a huge event. Whenever I attend these festivals, I feel like I'm bathing in "blackness" - immersed in an extraordinary variety of wares from around the Pan African world, food galore, African centered edu-tainment, and a sea of Black people!
The festivals also cause me to reflect on the sometimes tortuous quest to find the appropriate identity to define ourselves as formerly enslaved people in this country. That quest is an integral part of "cherishing a friendly union with ourselves" as discussed in a recent article. If full freedom/liberation were a reality, a discussion of the historical quest for identity would be a mere academic exercise. But, the state of emergency afflicting Black poor and working people and youth/young people in America's "dark ghettos" renders this a very important subject. I have a sense that some of the self-destructive behavior contributing to the violence and fratricide in the inner-cities is attributable to a lack of a sense of who we are as a people and a pride in our history and heritage.
Today Black and African identify is taken for granted. It's just a fact of life. However, historically developing a comfort level with Black/African identity was the result of intense and often painful internal struggles. More than any other ethnic group or nationality that arrived on these shores, the question /issue of identity for formerly enslaved Africans was of paramount importance. No other ethnic group/nationality had to endure a systematic effort to wipe out their history, culture and identity. Other groups, e.g., the British, Scots, Irish, Germans, Italians, Poles came with these vital elements in tact thereby, easing the process of creating new communities in a strange land. For these groups, cultural continuation was the basis for cohesion/unity that enabled them to develop an economic base in their communities and eventually begin to contest for political power as part of the process of fully integrating into American society with dignity and respect. This was not the case for people of African descent.
As the late Queen Mother Audley Moore used to teach, enslaved Africans were subjected to a sustained process of "de-Africanization" as part of a system of control imposed by the slave master. We were taught that our skin color was a mark of inferiority and our African origins, religion, music and customs a sign of savagery. Black people were uncivilized and therefore should respect their European slave masters and White people in general at all times. Moreover, it is difficult for people to understand the psycho-cultural impact of being a Black/African person in a European/White society/nation where the symbols and imagery of "white and black" re-enforce the idea of white superiority and black inferiority. In the English language white is always used to depict the positive while black virtually always denotes the negative. Dr. Martin Luther King once pointed this out in one of his speeches. You have references like the "black sheep of the family," or "behind the eight ball." "Whiteness" is a sign of purity and good. "Darkness is a sign of impurity and evil. The Angels and good people are white while one imagines the devil, villains and bad people draped in black. A "little white lie" is okay. Put the adjective "black" before anything and it intensifies the sense of the ominous, disastrous or catastrophic. Not even the food we eat escapes the black/white, positive/negative, superior/inferior dichotomy - there's "angel food cake" and "devil's food cake!"
It would be somewhat amusing if these matters were not so serious and sinister as it relates to their psycho-cultural impact on people of African descent and our painful quest to discover and affirm identity and culture as part of building a new community in a strange and hostile land. This question of identity was also complicated by voluntary and involuntary "race-mixing" or miscegenation. As Queen Mother Moore and other historians have noted, slave masters had free rein with African women. The consequence of this cohabitation was off-spring who were sometimes "light, bright and damn near white." Mullatoes in the race contributed to the debate among our forebears as to whether we were African, Colored or Negro.
In a real sense, however, the debate and struggle was not just about terminology; it was about how to uplift, encourage, motivate, inspire a despised people, disconnected from their ancestral homeland - many of whom had internalized the myth of White superiority and Black inferiority. This is why from our earliest days in America we find leaders like Richard Allen, Rev. David Nickens, Henry Highland Garnet, David Walker, Frederick Douglass, Bishop Henry McNeil Turner and numerous others heralding the role of Black people in the Bible, the glorious history of ancient Africa and the great empires of Ghana, Mali and Songhai. Whether African, Colored, Negro was their preferred identity, they were aware of the need to rehabilitate the self-image and self-esteem of a battered people. This was also one of the central tasks of Carter G. Woodson's seminal work, The Mis-education of the Negro.
The search for identity has been a persistent dimension of the Black Freedom Struggle in America -- the quest to create a new community from disparate ethnic groups, build social, economic and political institutions and wage the struggle for freedom/liberation within a Euro-centric, white supremacist society. Although today to be Black/African is non-controversial, unfortunately, there are vast numbers of our people who have no clue about the history/heritage and legacy of struggle associated with their identity. To be Black/African has lost its political potency as a weapon in the Black Freedom Struggle. Indeed, the "n-word" has even resurfaced as a "term of endearment" among our youth because of their ignorance or disregard for the negative history attached to that identification.
All of this suggests that a part of the" friendly union with ourselves" must involve a renewed emphasis on mass education about what it means to be Black/African in the 21st century in terms of our struggle for full freedom/liberation. Those among us who have achieved relative success must come to view their identity as Black/African as part of a legacy of struggle that demands that they be "of the race and for the race" as it relates to connecting to and fighting for the well being of the "have nots" in our communities. And, as we seek to educate/mobilize/organize the least among us, they must be armed with the power of positive identification with Black/African as a motivating force for social justice and social change. We must move beyond Black/African as a commonplace, cosmetic proposition to once again viewing identity as a vital element in community-building/nation-building and an indispensible weapon in the struggle for full freedom/liberation.
Dr. Ron Daniels is President of the Institute of the Black World 21st Century and Distinguished Lecturer at York College City University of New York. His articles and essays also appear on the IBW website www.ibw21.org and www.northstarnews.com . To send a message, arrange media interviews or speaking engagements, Dr. Daniels can be reached via email at info@ibw21.org.



The N-word
By Atangcho, Merius at Jul 18, 2010 01:26 AM
>>Indeed, the "n-word" has even resurfaced as a "term of endearment" among our youth because of their ignorance or disregard for the negative history attached to that identification.<<
While I do agree that historical perspective is lacking, really amongst Americans at large, for reasons that are antecedent to "ignorance" or "disregard" (failed school system, myopic news media, etc.), I must disagree with this point.
Language is very much contextual. There is plenty of creativity, both individually and culturally, that goes into what otherwise seems to be performed so automatically by the brain. Language is in constant flux. Just look in the dictionary: it's filled with examples of words that went from having very much a negative connotation to having a positive one, and vice versa. Connotation matters immensely in language.
"Nigger/nigga" might be a particularly grotesque example because of the grotesque nature of the circumstances surrounding its use, but at the end of the day, it is first and foremost a word, imbued with meaning and force by those who choose to use it.
The fact that the meaning and (negative) force was taken from the slave master and those with a slave master mentality and turned into a colloquial--or, perhaps more acurately, slang--term amongst those of 'slave provenance,' very much within a cultural context, is nothing to be alarmed about. (Hip hop, its adulteration aside, where the word is on full display, can hardly be said to have forgotten about slavery and racism, political as it was from its inception.) Furthermore, the negative response non-Blacks/Colored may receive for using the word also does not suggest lack of historical perspective, if just a little.
Interestingly, the word shares a similarity with terms from the African continent (Niger, Nigeria), begging the question of where it was derived from in the first place.
I'm not much for the philosophical, fanciful arguments about "term of endearment" or reclaiming the word as a way to take its power from the master and empower the slave, or what-not, though I can see its usefulness. I mainly find the issue and the arguments around it mostly uninteresting and distracting from more serious issues, some of which were discussed in your article.
By now, I resort to the following, perhaps inadequate in grotesqueness but instructive: look at the huge controversy and divide over "fuck." Many are offended, many use it, few find it OK when kids do. Apparently, there's a legal age for profanity, a certain maturity that must precede its use, but then when you reach that age, one still finds him- or herself reprimanded--that is, when in the wrong social/cultural context. The hypocrisy surrounding "fuck," and other such terms, abounds, but that's culture. Solve that issue, solve the 'n-word' issue, if there is an issue to solve anyway.
What I find far more interesting and alarming, and indicative of "ignorance" or "disregard" for history, is when I notice racism from the very people you would think would know better: Black soldiers chiming in with insults to Arabs, Israeli Jews' (and those in the diaspora) regard of Palestinians as sub-human, etc. Interesting as it is, however, I still find that there are far better arguments than "you should know better." Humans are complex beings; past experiences, even if vicarious, don't necessarily inform present actions in the most rational, logical, or expected manner, for better or worse, particularly when culture/socialization is added into the mix.
What's also very alarming is when Blacks look down on other Blacks for use of "nigger/nigga." Class struggles within the black community become very apparent here. The supposed vulgarity, as with "fuck," is now used to separate the "civilized" from the "uncivilized" or "savage," the "educated" from the "uneducated." The use of "nigger/nigga," as far as I can tell, has been fairly innocuous in Black hands. The controversy and negative commentary, however, (mainly from Blacks) have revealed cultural divides, that also appear to run parallel with economic divides. The economic divides are far more harmful, thus pertinent.
I have yet to hear debates over the "n-word" where wealthy, educated Blacks are called out on their "ignorance" or "disregard" for their history in their lack of solidarity and compassion with other Blacks over socio-economic issues that still haunt Black America. Of course, I most likely won't because Black elites can count on White elites not to expose them as such, while also counting on them to put down what they, the elites, collectively deem offensive about the culture.
So with whom does complicity in perpetuation of the Black condition lie?
Reply this comment