Add child menu
Edit menu
Remove menu
Add child menu
Set as Current Menu for this Page
Edit menu
Remove menu
Edit menu
Remove menu
Edit content box
Remove content box
Edit yellow box
Edit yellow box
Edit
Edit
Edit
Edit
Edit
Edit
Edit
Edit
Edit Biography
Edit Work
Edit Educational
Edit Interests
Edit
Edit
Edit
Edit
Edit
Edit
Edit
Edit
Edit
Edit
Edit
ZNet
ZMag
ZBooks
ZSocial
ZVid
ZSpace
ZBlog
Parecon
IOPS
Groups
Forums
Topic
Place
Bks
Remember me
Forgot Password?
Join ZCom
About
Video Tutorials
ZWriters
Recent Content
Comments
Audio
Video
Interviews
Debates
Intl
Customize
Store
Join
About ZMag
Current Issue
Online Archive
ZWriters
Subscribe
Renew
Submissions
Who/Contact
Search
ZBooks Store / Books to Buy
ZBooks Offerings
Fanfare
Reading Lists
PDF Manual
Q & A
News Feed
Contacts
Media
Blogs
Groups
Join
ZShorts & ZPreviews
Z Video Productions
Store Catalog
By Person
By Topic
By Place
View Online Videos
Join Z
ZSpacers
Commentaries
Photo Albums
Graphics
Quotes
Lyrics
Poems
Groups
Forums
Forum Arch.
Customize
Join
Writers
Sustainer
Chomsky
Albert
McGehee
Emersberger
Scipes
Street
Abu-Jamal
Vision/Strategy
Parsoc
Q/A
Cap Vs. Parecon
LAC
IPPS
Course
Look Forward
Parecon Bk
Think Forward
Move Forward
Mission
Vision
Structure/Program
ICC
Why Join...
IOPS Blogs
IOPS Forums
ZGroupsHelp
AllGroups
GroupForums
PSI
IOPS
Resoc
ParEcon
ParCulture
ParKinship
ParPol
HelpAlbert
ZVols
Forums Help
All Forums
Albert
Chomsky
Spannos
Activism
Ecology
Economy
Gender
Intl
Race
Vis/Strat
Old Forums
Activism
AltMedia
Media
Ecology
Economy
Feminism
Global Warming
Intl. Rels.
Labor
Politics
Race
Vision/Strategy
All
Africa
Asia
India
Europe
Latin America
Bolivia
Haiti
Venezuela
Mideast
Israel/Palestine
Iraq
Iran
Pakistan
Bk List
Bks of Week
Reading Lists
Secrets...
Yr 501
Rabble
Parecon
Move Forward
Think Forward
WITBU
Fanfare
Home
»
ZSpace
»
Brad Wilson ZSpace Page
»
Photo Albums
» Show
Brad Wilson
Web Address:
/zspace/bradwilson
Back
Subsidy Caps? Ag Biz vs. "Big Ag"
See here: the BIGest "Big Ag subsidies look big (but are Co-ops, ie. 9,000 members, so individual recipients are not really this big at all).
All subsidies must be put in the context of farm-price/price-floor drops. (Adjusted for inflation.) The yellow line is what Congress took from farmers, gave to Ag Biz (below prev. standard).
Same data: by decade. Clearly, farmers, big and small, got less, even with subsidies. Ag Biz gained. Consumers gained more from the farm share than they paid in subsidies. Vs. 1942-52!
Again, this time as percent of parity. Farmers got less, even with subsidies. Taxpayers as consumers netted a gain. Farmers subsidized them below fair trade, below costs. Congress did this!
Here, by decade, the trend is averaged out. Farmers lose, consumers gain. Corn is pauper, not "KING." Congress gave Ag Biz secret exploitation of farmers. Farmers got BLAME for Subsidies.
Hypothetical: 1995-2010: subsidies for top 4% of recipients reduced to level of top 5%. Wow, looks like MEGA fix of injustice!
Earlier, Ag Biz secretly gained from prices below 100% parity. They still do with subsidy caps! Payment Limit "Reform" does nothing to stop "cheap corn," exploitation of farmers by Ag Biz!
My hypothetical subsidy cap would have reduced all subsidy spending as shown here. These are reductions of compensatory subsidies to "Big Ag" farmers. Subsidies compensate all farmers (about 1/8) for massive reductions (8/8) that benefit Ag Biz (8/8).
Here I change scale, preparing to show "Big Ag" reductions in the context of "The Hidden Farm Bill," the secretly unaffected Ag Biz benefits. Yea, in that context, payment limits add up to bread crumbs, MEGA HIDDEN support for Ag Biz.
In the early aqua slides, you saw the HIDDEN Ag Biz benefits, in the MEGA reduction below the parity line, or below the 1942-1952 standard. This is slide 10. Click "close" then "Next" to see slides 11-15.
« Previous
1
2
Next »