Zcom_simple

Hello,

Blogs are a familiar feature on the internet - where users post content in an accumulating manner, with comments, and search options, etc. They facilitate expression and exploration, and via attached comments, also debate and synthesis.


Reading and
Navigating Blogs

Our blogs are quite powerful. Each writer can post, as is typically the case. Sustainers who have the option can also post, however. All Blogs appear in the blog system, and sometimes also in content boxes the top page of ZNet - and always via the left menu of the top page - and can be found via searches, etc.

Commenting on blogs follows the blogs, attached at the bottom, and blog comments, like all others, are also visible in many places that show comments including in the forum system. In addition, the entire blog system gathers content for everyone - but one can look at the accumulating content in many ways.

  • For example one can look at one writer's efforts - so one is seeing what is effectively a blog system for that one writer, or Sustainer.
  • One can also look at the content by topic, seeing blogs that are tagged as being about a certain topic - or place, as well. Thus, when doing that, it is a blog system about a topic, or a place, with many contributors.
  • One can look at only writer blogs, or only sustainer blogs, as well.
  • One can look at blogs for particular Groups, too.

All this is easily done using the left menu. Searches allow even more variables and refinements.


Creating Blog Posts

If you are a Sustainer with permission, and are logged in, you will see a link in the left menu for you to post a blog - and you can use that to post one, and then tag it various ways (such as with a topic or place, or a group tag), and once you do, it is in the system with you as the author.

You can also use the console button to the left to post a blog - anytime and from anywhere in the site, as long as you are logged in.

Meanwhile, enjoy the blogs - and, by the way, if you are a Free Member or a Sustainer with a ZSpace page, of course you can put one or more content boxes on it, pulling blog links of any sort you may want to filter for, for example, by you or by your friends or by others - and by topic, about places, for groups, etc.

Blogs

582867

Brian Small's Blog

Web Address: http://www.zcommunications.org/zspace/pingrin
Bio:   I'd like to win social change, realized that from reading Noam Chomsky books, finding Znet and plowing through Michael Albert's appeals for the last ten years or so. I had never really thoug... (More)

All Small Blogs

Basic Income

By Brian Small at Mar 18, 2009


Change Text Size a- | A+

I did a quick search of Znet to see if anyone mentioned Basic Income initiatives. Nothing came up.

From Daniel Raventos' Basic Income: The Material Conditions of Freedom's Product Description

 

Basic Income is simply the idea that everyone in a given society has a right to a minimal income. This is paid by the state out of taxation. Set at a subsistence level, it would take the place of unemployment and other benefits. This would bring profound social changes. Anyone could opt out of employment at any time. Those with few skills would no longer be forced to take up jobs with poor prospects, and employers offering McJobs would be forced to offer better terms. And money wasted by the state in means testing and tracing benefit fraud is saved.

I first read of the idea in a Japanese sponsor-free weekly magazine. (Shyukan Kinyoubi 2008/12/19 - It had a pretty impressive cover Big Bearded Head photo with large-font "Talking with Marx" headline). The same magazine just had a special collection of articles on the subject in their March 6th issue also. The only reason I noticed the term Basic Income was because the subject of that first interview, Yoshiharu Shiraishi, is a student of French and sees himself carrying on in the democratic tradition of Chomin Nakae, Shusui Kotoku and Sakae Oosugi - the Japanese Anarchist tradition. (p.30 12/19 issue)  He was comparing the high costs of Japan's universities to France's.  No matter how much French he teaches the French language isn't worn down. Why charge students as "consumers" when they're actually producting their future. (p. 32 12/19 issue)  He challenged the neoliberal conception of "The tragedy of the commons" with this idea that no matter how much you teach language and concepts they aren't degraded to become less valuable or useful.

Not only should education be free, but people should have the right to reject work, unemployment as a right. (p.34 12/19 issue). "We have the freedom to enter the labor market, but no freedom to leave it." He sees establishing a basic income as a way to guarantee a basic right to live (p.33 12/19).  I was surprised that I had never heard Basic Income debated (or even mentioned) in any of the Z materials. (I might be wrong)

Shiraishi's article, in the recent magazine features on Basic Income, lists several Japanese economists that are that are warming to the idea and countries that are already moving on implementation. (p. 11 3/6 issue) Brazil unde the Labor Party's Lula administration in 2003 passed laws to bring in "renda basica de cidadania", South Africa in 2002 was about to bring in Basic Income Grants (BIG) and Namibia has started a test project (BIGC,Basic Income Grant Coalition) in Otjivero-Omitara village as of January 2008.(p. 11 3/6 issue) Wikipedia mentions this experiment also.

In 2008, a pilot project with a basic income grant was started in the Namibian village of Otjivero by the Namibian Basic Income Grant Coalition.[7] After six months the project has been found to significantly reduce child malnutrition and increase school attendance. It was also found to increase the community's income significantly above the actual amount from the grants as it allowed citizens to partake in more productive economic activities. [8]

Shiraishi also writes that the Green parties in Ireland, France, Belgium, Holland, Germany, Canada and other places have been advocating BI and working it into their platforms. (p. 11 3/6 issue) Again Wikipedia provides this information in English

The Green parties in Ireland, France, Belgium, Holland, Germany, Canada and other places have been advocating BI and working it into their platforms. (p. 11 3/6 issue) Again Wikipedia provides English text to the same effect.

Many countries have political parties that advocate a basic income, such as the Green Party of Canada, Green Party of England and Wales, Vivant (Belgium), De Groenen (The Netherlands), the Scottish Green Party, and the New Zealand Democratic Party.

Worldwide, supporters of a basic income have united in the Basic Income Earth Network. BIEN recognizes numerous national advocacy groups.

Shiraishi's explanation of BI as remined me of Michael Albert's use of non-reformist reforms." Adopting Basic Income will achieve more than simply leveling the playing field with capital. We will be able to step away from wage labor and start organization to do the truly necessary work we'd like to do.  The ourselves will concieve the new world. Demands for a Basic Income are not outrageous. Basic income is  a modest beginning for true democracy, goverment for all by all. .. "

[Japanese citation Picture]

 Shuuji Ozawa looks at the finances and taxes involved in implementing an unconditionall payment of 80,000 yen (about 800 U.S. dollars) to all citizens. A family of three with a 7 million yen annual income ends up with a bit more money after taxes, as would a single person with and income of 2 million yen (about 20,000 US dollars). A single person with a 9 million yen income (90,000 dollars) ends up with less. Poor Baby. (p. 13 3/6).

I mentioned the articles to a Japanese friend, he did some internet research and said it was an interesting way to think about taxes and social safety nets.

I did a quick search for English Material for Basic Income and stumbled on books through Amazon.com. Basic Income: The Material Conditions of Freedom by Daniel Raventos and The Ethics And Economics of the Basic Income Guarantee (Alternative Voices in Contemporary Economics) by Karl Widerquist, Michael Anthony Lewis, Steven Pressman. The blurb for Ethics and Economics was provoking and you can read some of the book online. Basic income guarantee (BIG) proposals have been around in one form or another at least since Thomas Paine proposed his version in Agrarian Justice (1796)...

 I'd be interested to see some Z writer's analysis of Basic Income. MIght it be an easy concept to work toward? WIth a Basic Income Guarantee more people might have the wiggle room to be more active and even experiment with Parecon initiatives.

582867

Basic Income Study-

By Small, Brian at Mar 20, 2009 00:22 AM

I'd like to see something like thsi done on Basic Income, From Chalmers Johnson at TomDispatch "How to Sink America"

http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/174884

On May 1, 2007, the Center for Economic and Policy Research of Washington, D.C., released a study prepared by the global forecasting company Global Insight on the long-term economic impact of increased military spending. Guided by economist Dean Baker, this research showed that, after an initial demand stimulus, by about the sixth year the effect of increased military spending turns negative. Needless to say, the U.S. economy has had to cope with growing defense spending for more than 60 years. He found that, after 10 years of higher defense spending, there would be 464,000 fewer jobs than in a baseline scenario that involved lower defense spending.

Baker concluded:

    "It is often believed that wars and military spending increases are good for the economy. In fact, most economic models show that military spending diverts resources from productive uses, such as consumption and investment, and ultimately slows economic growth and reduces employment."

These are only some of the many deleterious effects of military Keynesianism.

Reply this comment


Person

By Falvo ii, Samuel at Mar 17, 2009 23:24 PM

The problem with BI is that it can become too addictive.  If everyone has the right to unemployment, and since it's in everyone's rational self-interest to earn money for the least possible work, it follows that most people will opt not to work.  This will reduce spending power amongst the population to that of subsistence levels only, which in turn, will reduce taxation revenue used to fund the problem.  It will, like a ringing bell, eventually dampen itself out.

I prefer Albert's effort-based incentivization.  It preserves the right to unemployment, while still providing a worthy payment model for those going to school.  If you become a deadbeat, then this becomes readily apparent, and your spending power decreases, potentially to zero if you're shunned outright from your local community.  Thus, even if you choose to drop out of a work place, you are still encouraged to better yourself through education, or other socially beneficial effort-bearing activities.

Reply this comment

Loading_border