Z Blogs
Recent ZBloggers
Recent Sustainer Blogs
By Michael Albert at Jun 11, 2004
Assuming we all fight for social change in the expectation that we will, at some point, win -- and assuming that we fight for a whole new social system, again, in the expectation that at some point we will win -- it follows that at some point there will b... (More) Comments (0)
Parecon and Society -- chapters
By Michael Albert at Jun 11, 2004
This is a list of possible chapters for a book on p[arecon and society. What others topics might be of interest? Supposing you could read anyone writing on any of these or other topics, whose views would you be interested in? Parecon and Polity Parecon... (More) Comments (0)
Parecon and Society: Education
By Michael Albert at Jun 11, 2004
This is a draft of a possible chapter, giving a broad idea of what they might be like...again, only a draft. Parecon and Education Part of education is intrinsic and oriented to the individual. To think about education starting with the student, we exa... (More) Comments (2)
Parecon and Society: Parecon Overview
By Michael Albert at Jun 11, 2004
This would be an opening chapter of this possible new book, summarizing parecon itself. Remember, these are merely drafts I am sharing in the blog...looking for some reactions. Parecon: An Overview Participatory economics, or parecon for short, is a pr... (More) Comments (0)
Parecon and Society: Possible Intro
By Michael Albert at Jun 10, 2004
I am thinking about the possibility of a new book perhaps entitled Parecon and Society. It would be about what having a parecon would mean for the rest of society, beyond the economy. I am curious if people think such a book would be useful. I am also cur... (More) Comments (0)
By Michael Albert at Jun 10, 2004
Recently I got an email telling me about a review of a book of mine, Looking Forward (SEP 1991) linked on the theory page of Anarcho-Syndicalist Review (http://www.syndicalist.org/theory/parecon1.shtml) I read it and was rather surprised by some of the co... (More) Comments (0)
By Michael Albert at Jun 10, 2004
A second interview for Polish publication... 1) Many economists, for example L. Mises and other austrian economists, think that private ownership of means of production is a necessity. They argue that without private ownership of means of production econ... (More) Comments (0)
By Michael Albert at Jun 10, 2004
I was asked to do an email interview by a friend from Poland, for publication there, dealing with a rising tide of market ideology among Polish economists. Since it bears on issues of parecon, I thought I might as well convey it here, as well... 1) In Po... (More) Comments (0)
By Michael Albert at Jun 10, 2004
In general, I cannot pledge I will relate to all comments, even all questions, posted to the blogs. There is only so much time available. However.... One of the comments I found said I "seem to start with a basic split between Producers and Consumers wh... (More) Comments (0)
By Noam Chomsky at Jun 10, 2004
It's important to bear in mind that there are two quite different Indias. There is the high tech India in Hyderabad, which Thomas Friedman raves about in his odes to "globalization" -- meaning, the neoliberal version of investor-rights-based internation... (More) Comments (4)
By Noam Chomsky at Jun 10, 2004
Turkey's human rights record has been awful, though it has been improving, as commentators routinely point out. But that overlooks a rather important fact: Turkey's crimes against its own population, particularly Kurds, rely crucially on (1) massive US mi... (More) Comments (0)
By Noam Chomsky at Jun 10, 2004
Questioner: Given that the arms race was a disaster for the Soviet Union economically and of little advantage militarily, why did the USSR engage in it? What it did to them economically is exactly what Khrushchev predicted, and presumably what JFK and hi... (More) Comments (0)
By Noam Chomsky at Jun 10, 2004
Personally, I don't see much useful analogy between Iraq and Vietnam. Vietnam was in a remote corner of the world that no one cared about very much, so the US could pound away at it, devastating four countries, with little international protest, and that... (More) Comments (2)
By Noam Chomsky at Jun 10, 2004
It's often pointed out in the international relations literature that the notion "puppet" is not a simple one. Puppets can often influence the dominant power significantly. The Soviet satellites were certainly "puppets," if the term has any meaning. But u... (More) Comments (2)
By Noam Chomsky at Jun 10, 2004
I believe this is the first such extravaganza in the US. ... There was something similar after the JFK assassination, but of course the assassination of a living president is quite different. I don't recall anything else remotely similar, perhaps since... (More) Comments (2)


