Book review: Newspeak in the 21st Century by David Edwards and David Cromwell
Source: Peace News
Tuesday, November 03, 2009
Since setting up the Media Lens website (www.medialens.org) in 2002, David Edwards and David Cromwell have been publishing regular ‘media alerts’ “correcting for the distorted vision of the corporate media”, encouraging readers to write directly to individual journalists to take them to task.
Largely made up of edited previously written media alerts, Newspeak in the 21st Century’s central thesis is that there is “a profound, consistent bias favouring powerful interests stretching right across the media spectrum.” So while it is widely understood that the right-wing media has a detrimental effect on political debate in the UK, Edwards and Cromwell go one step further, arguing the ’liberal media’ such as the Guardian, BBC and Channel Four news play a central role in the “deceptive and highly destructive sham” that is “modern corporate journalism.”
Influenced by Edward Herman’s and Noam Chomsky’s Propaganda Model, the authors are keen to point out this isn’t the result of a conspiracy, but rather the predictable outcome of free-market forces (ownership, advertising, education and selection of employees, sources quoted etc).
The book analyses the mainstream media’s coverage of Iraq, Iran, climate change, and includes a marvellous A-Z of BBC propaganda. Peace News readers may also welcome the thought-provoking exploration of Buddhist teachings on happiness, compassion and activism in the closing chapter. Particularly shocking are the sections highlighting the Government-friendly media coverage of the 2004 and 2006 Lancet reports on Iraqi deaths and Hugo Chavez‘s decade-long tenure as the president of Venezuela. Both examples suggest a level of intellectual conformity among our supposedly free media on a par with Soviet-era Pravda journalists.
Best - and most entertaining - of all are the replies Edwards and Cromwell elicit from journalists. Often bemused and intellectually muddled, sometimes angry and rude, these exchanges offer a fascinating insight in to sheer ignorance and ideological blindness of those said to write the first draft of history. For example, when asked to justify a reporter’s claim the US and UK “came to Iraq in the first place to bring democracy and human rights”, the BBC’s Head of News says this “analysis of the underlying motivation of the coalition is borne out in the many speeches and remarks made by both Mr Bush and Mr Blair.” In short, Our Dear Leaders have spoken.
Scrupulously footnoted, persuasively argued and very accessible, along with the first Media Lens’ book Guardians of Power, Newspeak in the 21st Century is an essential addition to every activist’s bookshelf.
Newspeak in the 21st Century by David Edwards and David Cromwell is published by Pluto Press, priced £16.99.
Ian Sinclair is a freelance writer based in London, UK. ian_js@hotmail.com.
ZNet Articles
Blog Posts
Re: Book review: Newspeak in the 21st Century by David Edwards and David Cromwell
By Baldwin, Anthony at Nov 06, 2009 21:28 PM
Dear Mark, I'm reading the book at the moment. I have not got to the last chapter, yet.
Wasn't it Einstein who said you can't solve a problem with the same level conconsciousness by which it was created? It seems to me that you can create models until the cows come home but they won't work unless the level of consciousnessnes is changed The only writer I am aware of who deals with both sides of the poblem adequately is the intellectual/mystic Aldous Huxley. In his last novel Island, he outlines a society whch is both rationally and compassionately designed.
Reply this comment
Re:
By Evans, Mark at Nov 18, 2009 08:12 AM
Hi Anthony - I think you would have a point if the participatory models that I advocate were the product of conventional wisdom - but they are not.
I have written about the connection between consciousness and institutions here - http://www.zcommunications.org/znet/viewArticle/21167
I have also written a review of Newspeak in the 21st Century -http://www.zcommunications.org/znet/viewArticle/22783#13524
Reply this comment
I agree ... but!
By Evans, Mark at Nov 06, 2009 14:13 PM
I agree that "Newspeak in the 21st Century" is an important book but don't you think that, given that the fundamental problem is identified as systemic to the economy, the final chapter would have been better if it actually offered an alternative economic model rather than a means of individual enlightenment?
Reply this comment
The user who created this comment no longer exists.