Zcom_simple
?1295269164

May 2007

Volume , Number


NOTE: Z Magazine subscribers and sustainers have access to all Z Magazine articles here and in the archive. The latest Z Magazine articles available to everyone are listed in the Free Articles box at the top of the table of contents, and are starred in the list below. Questions? e-mail Z Magazine Online.

Bootilicious!

Change Text Size a- | A+


W elcome to Hotel Satire, where gals come to learn their true purpose on this earth, i.e., to service men. Take sports. Gals still seem to think that they are entitled to engage in athletic endeavors in stadiums and gymnasiums, on fields and streams, and even in public parks. 

How far this sense of entitlement has gone is evident from the letters we have been receiving at Hotel Satire. The following are a few examples of the consciousness-lowering that needs to be done on today’s gals. 


Dear Hotel Satire, 

I have been following the Don Imus/Rutgers women’s (mostly black) basketball team situation where he referred to the women as “nappy-headed hos” on his “Imus in the Morning” radio show (simulcast on MSNBC cable TV). Here’s the infamous exchange between Imus, the show’s producer, Bernard Mc Guirk, and Sid Rosenberg, host of a mid-morning sports show in Miami. 


DON IMUS: So I watched the basketball game last night between a little bit of Rutgers and Tennessee, the women’s final. 

SID ROSENBERG: Yeah, Tennessee won last night, seventh championship for Pat Summitt, I-Man. 

DON IMUS: Some rough girls from Rutgers. Man, they’ve got tattoos and… 

BERNARD MCGUIRK: Some hardcore hos. 

DON IMUS: That’s some nappy-head- ed hos there.... Man, that’s some —ooh! And the girls from Tennessee, they all look cute, you know, so—like kind of like a…. I don’t know if I’d have wanted [them] to beat Rutgers or not. But they did, right? 

SID ROSENBERG: It was a tough watch. The more I look at Rutgers, they look exactly like the Toronto Raptors [men’s basketball team, currently 16-23]. 


The outcry that ensued focused on the racism of the interchange, which it should have, but not so much on the sexism, as well as the intersection between the two. NBC News, which simulcasts Imus’s radio program on its cable news channel MSNBC called his comments “racist and abhorrent.” Media spokesMEN for the black community were outraged at the racism as well—Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson, Spike Lee, Barack Obama. Comments on the Internet also focused mainly on the racial aspect, as did many TV and radio sports shows. The main statements re. gender came from Oprah and the Rutgers team coach, C. Vivian Springer, who said at a press conference, that, “It’s not about the Rutgers women’s basketball team, it’s about women…it’s about us as people.” 

So why no similar outrage about an interchange where female athletes were denigrated by their sexuality (hos) or looks (cute) or non-compliance with male ideas of femininity (tough/hardcore) or were reduced to pre-pubescent status (girls)? 

One reason could be that no organized women’s movement spokes- people stepped up or received media attention when they did. Or could it be a reflection of the fact that women athletes/sports are second class citizens in the male-dominated sports world? Women’s sports receives little coverage in newspapers and in sports magazines. When they do get coverage, it’s to titillate men, as in the Sports Illustrated swimsuit issue or as highly sexualized female cheerleaders. On the TV sports show “Pardon the Interruption,” on the rare occasion when they do mention female athletes, it’s because of their looks and men’s sexual attraction to them—as in Danika Patrick (race car driver) or Maria Sharapova (tennis player). 

Speaking of racism, sexism, and tennis, Sid Rosenberg, one of the participants in the Imus interchange. has remarked on the air (when employed by the Imus show in 2001) that Venus and Serena Williams (African American tennis players) would be better suited for National Geographic than Playboy ; that “faggots play tennis”; that the U.S. women’s national soccer team was “a bunch of juiced up dykes,” and in regard to singer-songwriter Kylie Minogue’s breast cancer, that she “ain’t gonna be so beautiful when the bitch got bald head and one titty.” (He was removed from the Imus show after that comment.) Oh, he also said about Palestinians, during Arafat’s funeral, that they ought to “drop the bomb there, kill ’em all right now.” 

Nice guy. As of this writing, Imus has been fired. The final straw was the show’s sponsors threatening to pull their ads. What integrity. While sponsors express outrage, they continue to feature sexist corporate advertising on websites and in TV ads. 

Will the outrage that ensued and the firing of Imus change racist attitudes and institutions? Doubtful. The lesson around racism will probably be: use it selectively and carefully. Definitely don’t go after a basketball team that just played a nationally televised championship game with corporate sponsors and lots of adoring fans. The message around sexism? Bring it on, baby! 

Frame1

imus rutgers

—Signed, When will it stop? 

Dear When, 

H uh? I fell asleep while reading your letter. When will it stop? When everyone realizes that gals in sports are a joke, plus annoying to men. Except, say, gal’s beach volleyball where  tanned, half-nude gals bounce and tumble around in the sand. Or if they make posing for the swimsuit issue a sport. Yowsa. Also acceptable would be any sport where we see enough gals’ cleavages and crotches to make watching gals sweat and compete bearable. 

As to Don Imus. We are sickened by his firing. He is a wonderful man, named one of the 25 Most Influential People in America by Time Magazine and a member of the National Broadcasters Hall of Fame. We read about his ranch were he helps sick children in Architectural Digest. We’re glad his Radiothon raised $1.3 million for charity (and received many messages of support). Besides, he was telling it like it is.  


Dear Hotel Satire, 

R ecently, kidnapping and sexual offense charges against three members of the Duke Lacrosse team—Collin Finnerty (previously charged with assaulting a man and shouting anti-gay epithets), Reade Seligmann, and David Evans—were dropped for lack of evidence and contradictory testimony from the “accuser,” now named as Crystal Gail Mangum. 

Mangum was working as an escort and stripper when she claimed three Lacrosse team members beat, strangled, and sexually assaulted her at a bachelor party. The case became one of he said/she said, plus politicking by the local DA, plus not much evidence of assault. Magnum, an African American, had served in the U.S. Navy, was a single mother, and a student at North Carolina Central University. 

What has been ignored in all this is the uncontested fact that an email was sent from lacrosse player Ryan McFadyen (not accused of anything), which discussed hiring strippers and “killing the bitches”; that Mangum and another female “performer” were hired to perform at a bachelor party for five men at an off-campus house rented by the lacrosse team and owned by Duke University; and that nasty things happened . 

Clearly, sports talk shows and news media in general could have used this case to comment on how male sports stars—high school, college, and professional—expect to be “serviced” by women at “parties,” often arranged by their team or with the implied consent of their institutions and leagues. Media pundits could have looked into the sexist and racist dynamics of college and professional sports teams; or the boys club atmosphere that condones mis- ogyny. 

Instead, the lesson from this case will probably be that gals are drug- ged “hos” who falsely accuse "fine” young men, thereby ruining their careers. It will undoubtedly continue to prevent women who have really been assaulted to speak up. 

—Signed, Missed the Boat 


Dear Missed the Boat, 

T he only boat you missed is the one where gals service men, if you catch my drift. 


Dear Hotel Satire, 

I was angered by the media excitement generated by the nomination of Jennifer Hudson for an Academy Award (which she won for Dream- girls). The “buzz” was not so much about her talent, but her size! A headline in USA Today read, “Stars carry curves with confidence.” Writes Donna Freydkin, “It’s a reality-show reject from Chicago [she lost on “American Idol”] who proud- ly wears a size 12 [most Hollywood actresses fit into size 0-2; while the average woman in the U.S. weighs 164.3 pounds] and flaunts her ample curves…. Tyra Banks, who marked the tenth anniversary of her iconic Sports Illustrated swimsuit cover by reshooting it 20 pounds heavier, concurs. ‘Beyonce, myself, all women who have curves are embracing our curves, and that needs to continue. I thank the Lord for Jennifer Hudson and the attention and coverage she’s getting. She’s curvy and beautiful’.... And she’s grinning on the March cover of fashion bible Vogue, while bootylicious Beyonce sizzles on the front of the Sports Illustrated swimsuit issue.” 

So we’re supposed to praise Hollywood  and the fashion industry for for their sexist appreciation of women who wear a size 12 (most of the women mentioned in the article were black, a rare media occurence), as if this is an advance for women to be sexually objectified on the cover of Vogue without starving to death? Can’t anyone talk about the sexism/racism of entire industries that care more about women’s looks and weight than anything else; that demand women wear three inch heels and show cleavage in almost every role they play? 

—Signed, Am I nuts or what? 

Dear Nuts, 

Y es. Any gal who is not booty- licious and sizzling is annoying to men and therefore nuts. 




Lydia Sargent is on the staff of Z. 

Loading_border