Zcom_simple
?1295269164

March 2004

Volume , Number 0


Activism

There are no articles.

Commentary

There are no articles.

Culture

There are no articles.

Features

Hotel Satire
Lydia Sargent


Justice
Ashwin Raman


Health
John e. Peck


Photo Essay
Joseph Nevins


Homeless
Viviana Mazza


Grassroots Media
J.p. Leary


Poetry & Performance
Sue Katz


Labor
William Johnson


Fog Watch
Edward Herman


Children
Alex Halperin


Interview
Victor Tan chen


Conservative Watch
Bill Berkowitz


Foreign Policy
David Bacon


Zaps

There are no articles.

NOTE: Z Magazine subscribers and sustainers have access to all Z Magazine articles here and in the archive. The latest Z Magazine articles available to everyone are listed in the Free Articles box at the top of the table of contents, and are starred in the list below. Questions? e-mail Z Magazine Online.

Bush’s Faith-Based Parks

Change Text Size a- | A+


A lthough President Bush’s faith-based initiative—one of the centerpieces of his domestic agenda—has yet to win congressional approval, ramifications of the proposal have been felt in a number of government agencies. The latest agency to take up the president’s faith-based call is the National Park Service. Recently, the NPS brought Christian displays to national parks and creationist books to the souvenir shops. It has also been reported that the NPS was considering removing historical information it found “conservatively incorrect” from historical documents and video presentations. 

According to a late-December press release issued by Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER), the National Park Service “approved the display of religious symbols and Bible verses, as well as the sale of creationist books giving a non-evolutionary explanation for the Grand Canyon and other natural wonders within national parks.” 

In addition, the press release claimed that pressure from conservative groups was causing the Park Service to consider editing a videotape, shown at the Lincoln Memorial since 1995, which contains images of demonstrations—including gay rights and abortion rights rallies—that occurred at the memorial. 

According to PEER, the National Park Service also agreed to review footage of anti-Vietnam War demonstrations. Conservatives argued the protests implied “Lincoln would have supported homosexual and abortion ‘rights’ as well as feminism.” According to PEER, the Park Service “promised to develop a ‘more balanced’ version that included rallies of the Christian group Promise Keepers and pro- Gulf War demonstrators though these events did not take place at the Memorial.” 

A day after the PEER press release, Planet Out, an online magazine reported that the “story had changed” dramatically.  NPS Chief of Public Affairs, David Barna, assured Winne Stachelberg, the political director at the Human Rights Campaign, a national gay rights group, that footage of gay rights demonstrations would not be removed from presentations at the Lincoln Memorial. “It sounds as if the park service is getting pressure from right-wing extremists groups to drop images of the gay community and add other images,” Stachelberg told Planet Out. 

The genesis of the current NPS controversy lies with a letter written last February by Kansas Republican Congressperson Todd Tiahrt. In the letter addressed to the NPS, Tiahrt “objected to the portions of the video that depict gays and a National Abortion Rights League rally,” Bill Line, a spokesperson for the National Park Service told Planet Out. Currently, Tiahrt is “in discussion” with the park service about adding scenes with the Promise Keepers march. 

The alleged directive was the latest in a series of moves by the NPS to cater to the demands of the president’s conservative Christian constituency. In July, PEER reports, NPS Deputy Director Murphy “ordered the Grand Canyon National Park to return three bronze plaques bearing biblical verses to public viewing areas on the Canyon’s South Rim.” The plaques were made and donated by the Evangelical Sisterhood of Mary in Phoenix, who live in a convent called Cannan in the Desert. 

According to PEER, “Murphy overruled the park superintendent who had directed the plaques’ removal based on legal advice from the Interior Department that the religious displays violated the First Amendment. In a letter to the Evangelical Sisterhood, Murphy apologized for ‘any intrusion resulting from’ the temporary removal of the plaques quoting Psalms 68:4, 66:4, and 104:24 and pledged ‘further legal analysis and policy review’ before any new action is taken.” 

Early this fall, the Park Service also approved a creationist text, Grand Canyon: A Different View, for sale in park bookstores and museums. The book’s editor, Tom Vail, writes: “For years, as a Colorado River guide I told people how the Grand Canyon was formed over the evolutionary time scale of millions of years. Then I met the Lord. Now, I have a different view of the Canyon, which, according to the Biblical time scale, can’t possibly be more than about a few thousand years old.” The 104-page book contains essays and observations from 23 “creation scientists and theologians.” PEER points out, “Park Service leadership has blocked publication of guidance for park rangers and other interpretative staff that labeled creationism as lacking any scientific basis.” 

In a related legal battle, the Park Service is fighting “to continue displaying an 8-foot-tall cross, planted atop a 30-foot-high rock outcropping in the Mojave National Preserve in California,” PEER reports. A suit to force the removal of the cross, is now pending before the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. 

“The Park Service leadership now caters exclusively to conservative Christian fundamentalist groups,” said PEER Executive Director Jeff Ruch. “The Bush administration appears to be sponsoring a program of faith-based parks.” 

“In 1983, Wallace Stenger wrote, ‘National parks are the best idea we ever had. Absolutely American, absolutely democratic, they reflect us at our best rather than our worst.’ Twenty years later, National Parks have lost most of what once made them special. They are quickly coming to reflect the corporate, commercial, and pro-special interest values of the Bush administration at its absolute worst,” said Scott Silver, executive director of Wild Wilderness.  


Bill Berkowitz is a freelance writer covering conservative movements. 
Loading_border