Volume , Number 0
There are no articles.Commentary
There are no articles.Culture
There are no articles.Features
Class & Gays
Anna marie Smith
Gabriel San román
Z Papers on Strategy
Nicolas J.S. Davies
Gay & Lesbian Community Notes
Son of Dick
There are no articles.
NOTE: Z Magazine subscribers and sustainers have access to all Z Magazine articles here and in the archive. The latest Z Magazine articles available to everyone are listed in the Free Articles box at the top of the table of contents, and are starred in the list below. Questions? e-mail Z Magazine Online.
Bush Launches A New Middle East Initiative
Pretty much no one is taking it seriously. Even mainstream analysts usually willing to take Bush administration Middle East initiatives at face value are rolling their collective eyes. The New York Times senior correspondent Steven Erlanger acknowledged in July that Bushs latest vision, a U.S.-Israeli-Fatah alliance creating a model Palestine in the West Bank designed to snub the isolated Hamastan in Gaza, is not a vision shared by other American allies or other members of the so-called quartetRussia, the European Union, and the United Nations. (Yes, even the Times said so-called quartet.) It is also doubtful that the Saudis share Mr. Bushs analysis, since they have been urging Hamas and Fatah to get back together again. A different Times article included a succinct headline identifying the real reason for the latest initiative: Mired in Iraq, U.S. Seeks to Begin Building a Palestinian State.
The plan, such as it is, is painfully familiar, only narrower and more constrained than ever before. The centerpiece is a call for a new regional peace conference in the fall, to be led not by Bush himself, but by his Secretary of State. Bush says it will include Israel, the Palestinians, and their neighbors in the region. But the only Palestinians allowed to participate will be the Abbas-led Fatah- controlled sector of the Palestinian Authority operating in the West Bank; the democratically elected Hamas-led Palestinian parliament and its government in Gaza will be excluded. It may include some neighboring governments, but only those who recognize Israels right to exist. Regional powers like Syria and Iran would of course be excluded, but it is not clear that even Jordan and Egypt, which maintain official diplomatic ties with Israel, let alone Saudi Arabia which doesnt, would publicly accept Israels right to have expelled Palestinians to create an exclusive Jewish state. Overall, its not likely to be much of a conference.
Another part of Bushs plan involves renewed U.S. aid to the Palestinians. Following 18 months of a crippling U.S.-orchestrated international economic boycott of the Palestinian territories, Bush announced that immediately after President Abbas expelled Hamas from the Palestinian government, the United States lifted financial restrictions on the Palestinian Authority. Bush referred to the emergency government appointed by Abbas, led by his replacement Prime Minister Salam Fayyad. A key component of this aid is an $80 million grant in military aid to Abbass Fatah-controlled security agencies now operating with the support of U.S. General Keith Dayton.
Bush also said he will push Israel to release Palestinian tax revenueswhich Israel had illegally withheld since February 2006as if that was a major concession. Regarding settlements, he called only for ending settlement expansion and removing the 2,000 or so settlers of the unauthorized outpostsunauthorized by the Israeli government that is; all settlements are illegal under international law. Any future territorial agreement, Bush said, would have to take into account current realitiesmeaning that the existing huge Israeli settlement-cities and most of the 480,000 West Bank and East Jerusalem settlers will remain. The latest U.S. embrace of Abbas and calls for a Palestinian state are emerging just as realistic hopes of a viable two-state solution are fading.
Islamism, Islamic Nationalism, and Bush
However inevitable the failure of Bushs latest plan, it is important to recognize how it fits into broader U.S. strategy in the Middle East. The most recent iteration of the ideological framework for Bushs new Middle East describes an existential conflict between moderates and extremists being fought out in the so-called Global War on Terror (GWOT). But of course those Manichean categories simply dont exist beyond the limited vision of Washington and Tel Aviv. The Palestinian struggle against the U.S.-backed Israeli military occupation didnt start with Bushs GWOTalthough the false claim of global terrorism in Palestine has become a key pretext in U.S. efforts to justify its uncritical support for Israeli occupation and apartheid. The black-and-white notion of good Fatah, good Abbas vs. bad Hamas, bad Haniyeh has no resonance among Palestinians themselves or anywhere else in the region.
Bush tried to equate the Islamic nationalism of Hamas with the anti-state obscurantist extremism of al Qaeda, claiming (as Abbas did as well) that Hamas had welcomed al Qaeda to Gaza. The claim sparked particular outrage among Palestinians. But it is consistent with the White Houses regional strategic approach of equating, isolating, and attempting to eliminate all Islamic- identified forces that resist U.S. hegemony in the region. Part of the U.S. strategy includes efforts to establish or prop up governments in the region whose main job is to stand against various kinds of Islamist resistancethink Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, to some degree even Lebanon.
Hamas has no known ties to al Qaeda, which actually condemned Hamas when the Palestinian organization decided to participate in elections. Like Hezbollah in Lebanon, Hamas uses an Islamic framework rather than secular nationalism to fight a traditional struggle against occupation and for national political power (what would be state power if Palestine were a state). They provided social and economic support as well as popular resistance to gain influence and electoral support in elections deemed free and fair by former President Jimmy Carter and a host of U.S. and European monitors.
Fatahs dwindling credibility also reflects global and regional shifts. This is a moment when Islamic nationalism is on the ascendancy throughout the region, when anti-imperialism in the Middle East is defined more and more by Islamist forces while secular Palestinian nationalism, Arab nationalism, and Arab socialism have all lost ground. So it is crucial to understand the distinctions between the various strands of Islamist strategy. Groups such as al Qaeda, the Taliban, and some in Pakistan want U.S. troops out of the region and existing governments destroyed in order to impose a rigid theocracy enforcing the most extreme and reactionary interpretations of Islamic law in a broad region in which national borders and national identities are wiped out. Islamic nationalist forces, such as Hamas, Hezbollah, and some Iraqi parties, define their goal as the end of foreign military occupation and an Islamic-identified, but largely inclusive (though not secular) government within nation- states.
A key difference, of course, is the state-based focus of these organizations. Unlike al Qaeda and others trying to destroy state governments and create a new caliphate across the Muslim world, the Islamic nationalists operate and struggle for power within existing (and anticipated) nation-state structures. Since their election in January 2006, Hamas leaders have stated clearly that their operative goal is a long-term truce with Israel, the right of return of Palestinian refugees, and creation of a Palestinian state in the 1967 occupied territories, which they would govern in coalition with the secular Fatah and other factions.
Fatah, Hamas, & U.S./Israel
Many Palestinians still view Fatah, long the centerpiece of Palestinian national politics, as their political home. But the near-collapse of the PLO and the rise of the Oslo-created and U.S.-backed Palestinian Authority (PA) led to more criticism of Fatahs strategic failures and corruption and, more recently, new censure has arisen regarding the Fatah leaderships close ties to the U.S. As a result, many Palestinians have distanced themselves from the organization. Human rights, social welfare, and other civil society organizations have been particularly concerned about Abbass recent decree replacing the existing law mandating registration of NGOs and other associations with a new order requiring organizations to apply for a license from the Palestinian Ministry of the Interiorand giving the Ministry the right to deny any group a license to operate.
At the same time, many Palestinians in Gaza as well as the West Bank view with unease the Islamic tilt of Hamas politics. So far the social agenda they have implemented, particularly regarding women, has been, in the Palestinian context, conservative, but not extremist. Whether Hamas is telling the truth or not about their longer term intentions, political conditions on the groundparticularly the still powerful secular forces within Palestinian societywill make imposition of the most coercive forms of Islamic law unlikely. Many also strongly oppose Hamass brutal military attacks against Fatah in Gaza. But its legitimacy remains, as Hamas did win Palestinian elections with a clear majority. A recent July 4 poll by the Fatah-oriented al-Quds newspaper reported 41 percent support for Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh, with Fatahs 25 percent divided between 13 percent for Abbas and 12 percent for Marwan Barghouti, the imprisoned leader of Fatahs younger and less compromised generation. In that same poll Abbass U.S.-backed prime minister, Salam Fayyad, re- ceived only 5 percent of the vote.
The violence of the internal Palestinian struggle in recent months reflects a deep and longstanding crisis within the Palestinian national movement. Neither the U.S.-allied secular nationalism of Fatahs leadership, nor the still untested Islamist nationalism of Hamas have so far been able to provide the Palestinians with the kind of new strategic vision required to strengthen the weakened PLO and rebuild the now fragile movement it once so powerfully represented.
But even beyond the human catastrophe of the fighting, the tragedy is that in this horrific struggle among the Palestinians, both sides are really fighting over the leftover crumbs of power. The full loaf of power and the main responsibility for the violence belongs to the Israeli occupation and its U.S. backers. In the 16 months from the Palestinian elections in January 2006 through April 2007, Israeli troops killed 712 Palestinians, almost half of them children. During that same period, much of which included Hamass unilateral ceasefire, Palestinians killed 29 Israelis, including soldiers and civilians.
There is no question that U.S.-Israeli hands lay behind the escalating tensions and eventual violence of the Fatah-Hamas split. In a leaked confidential report written by former UN representative to the so-called Quartet, Peruvian diplomat Alvaro de Soto acknowledged that the U.S. clearly pushed for a confrontation between Fatah and Hamasso much so that, a week before Mecca [the Saudi- brokered unity agreement between the two factions], the U.S. envoy declared twice in an envoys meeting in Washington how much I like this violence, referring to the near-civil war that was erupting in Gaza in which civilians were being regularly killed and injured, because it means that other Palestinians are resisting Hamas.
To try and achieve some level of international legitimacy for a diplomacy surge in the Middle East that might divert attention away from his catastrophic war in Iraq, Bush orchestrated this summer the appointment of his once-and-future strongest ally, former British Prime Minister Tony Blair, as representative of the Quartet. But even now, despite Blair having largely sacrificed his own political career and legacy at the altar of the U.S. war in Iraq, the Bush administration continues to insult and disrespect him. In his last appearance before the British Parliament, Blair said proudly that his absolute priority in his new role was to prepare the ground for a negotiated settlement between Israel and the Palestinians. Two days later, State Department spokesperson Tom Casey flatly contradicted him, saying, Theres certainly no envisioning that this individual would be a negotiator between the Israelis and Palestinians.
That was more consistent with Blairs earlier recognition of the limitations of his own role. Talking candidly with Bush in 2006 on microphones they thought were turned off, Blair offered to do whatever the U.S. wanted, apparently regardless of what that was, while recognizing that what he did had little significance.
So What Do We Do?
The divide within the Palestinian movementespecially the violence of this past summerhas confused and demoralized many supporters of Palestinian human rights and the movement to end Israeli occupation. But neither the splits nor the violence change the overall obligation of international supporters of a just, comprehensive, human rights-based peace.
When the Palestinian elections resulted in an outcome challenging the Bush administrations expectations, the U.S. responded with a complete economic boycott of the entire Palestinian population of the occupied territories. Somehow the legitimacy of such a collective punishment was never considered an appropriate question in the mainstream U.S. mediawhile even talking of boycotts against the Israeli occupation engenders immediate accusations of dis- crimination, support for terrorism, even anti-Semitism.
The global call for boycotts, divestment, and sanctions (BDS) represents the most promising non-violent economic pressure campaign to force an end to Israels violations of UN resolutions and international law. The BDS call was launched in 2005 by Palestinian civil society organizations and the UN-based International Coordinating Network on Palestine. Applying the lessons and adopting some of the techniques of the powerful global movement against South African apartheid in the 1980s, the BDS campaign includes diverse supporters using a broad array of tactics. It includes the socially responsible investment of the Presbyterian and other Christian churches committed to investigating and reversing corporate support for occupation and the stockholder campaigns against Caterpillars sales of bulldozers used illegally as Israeli military weapons in the occupied territories. The U.S. Campaign to End Israeli Occupation will soon decide on a corporate target for national boycott and divestment campaigns throughout the U.S.
Globally there are important successes already. While the humanitarian and political situation inside the occupied territories continues to deteriorate as Israel escalates its divide-and-conquer tactics of occupation and dispossession, BDS pressures are on the rise in direct defiance. Two of Britains largest trade union federations recently passed boycott resolutions. The powerful Canadian Union of Public Employees voted to support BDS campaigns. In South Africa, home of the first anti- apartheid campaign, influential government officials and key backers of the ruling African National Congressthe ANC womens federation, its youth league, the Communist Party, the COSATU trade union federationall have come out for sanctions to force Israeli compliance with international law.
The U.S. and global peace mobilizations cannot rebuild the Palestinian national movement from outside and it is rarely useful for us to take sides in the internal conflict, beyond supporting unity efforts and working to defend Palestinian civil society organizations. The best answer to U.S. support for Israeli occupation and apartheid and to U.S. divide-and-conquer tactics against the Palestinians will be the consolidation of a broad popular movement saying nojoining the rising global movement for BDS as a powerful non-violent tool that challenges that U.S. support and demands an entirely new foreign policy based not on power, but on justice and equal rights for all.
Phyllis Bennis is a fellow of the Institute for Policy Studies. Her newest book is Understanding the Palestinian-Israeli Conflict: A Primer.
Z Magazine Archive
CUBAN 5 - From May 30 to June 5, supporters of the Cuban 5 will gather in Washington DC to raise awareness about the case and to demand a humanitarian solution that will allow the return of these men to their homeland.
Contact: firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com.
BIKES - Bikes Not Bombs is holding its 24th annual Bike- A-Thon and Green Roots Festival in Boston, MA on June 3, with several bike rides, music, exhibitors, and more.
Contact: Bikes Not Bombs, 284 Amory St., Jamaica Plain, MA 02130; 617-522-0222; mailbikesnotbombs.org; www.bikesnotbombs.org.
LEFT FORUM - The 2013 Left Forum will be held June 7-9, at Pace University in NYC.
Contact: 365 Fifth Avenue, CUNY Graduate Center, Sociology Dept., New York, NY 10016; http://www.leftforum.org/.
VEGAN FEST - Mad City Vegan Fest will be held in Madison, WI, June 8. The annual event features food, speakers, and exhibitors.
Contact: 122 State Street, Suite 405 B, Madison, WI 53701; firstname.lastname@example.org; http://veganfest.org/.
ADC CONFERENCE - The American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee (ADC) holds its annual conference June 13-16 in Washington, DC, with panel discussions and workshops.
Contact: 1990 M Street, Suite 610, Washington, DC, 20036; 202-244-2990; convention @adc. org http://convention.adc.org/.
CUBA/SOCIALISM - A Cuban-North American Dialog on Socialist Renewal and Global Capitalist Crisis will be held in Havana, Cuba, June 16-30. There will be a 5-day Seminar at the University of Havana, plus visits to a co-op and educational and medical institutions.
Contact: email@example.com; http://www.globaljustice center.org/.
NETROOTS - The 8th Annual Netroots Nation conference will take place June 20-23 in San Jose, CA. The event features panels, trainings, networking, screenings, and keynotes.
Contact: 164 Robles Way, #276, Vallejo, CA 94591; firstname.lastname@example.org; http://www.netrootsnation.org/.
MEDIA - The 15th annual Allied Media Conference will be held June 20-23, in Detroit.
Contact: 4126 Third Street, Detroit, MI 48201; http://alliedmedia.org/.
GRASSROOTS - The United We Stand Festival will be hosted by Free & Equal, June 22 in Little Rock, Arkansas. The festival aims to reform the electoral process in the U.S.
LITERACY - The National Association for Media Literacy Education (NAMLE) will hold its conference July 12-13 in Los Angeles.
Contact: 10 Laurel Hill Drive, Cherry Hill, NJ 08003; http://namle.net/conference/.
IWW - The North American Work People’s College will take place July 12-16 at Mesaba Co-op Park in northern Minnesota. The event will bring together Wobblies from across the continent to learn skills and build one big union.
PEACESTOCK - On July 13, the 11th Annual Peacestock will take place at Windbeam Farm in Hager City, WI. The event is a mixture of music, speakers, and community for peace. Sponsored by Veterans for Peace.
Contact: Bill Habedank, 1913 Grandview Ave., Red Wing, MN 55066; 651-388-7733; email@example.com; http://www. peacestockvfp.org.
LA RAZA - The annual National Council of La Raza (NCLR) Conference is scheduled for July 18-19 in New Orleans, with workshops, presentations, and panel discussions.
Contact: NCLR Headquarters Office, Raul Yzaguirre Building, 1126 16th Street, NW, Washington, DC 20036; 202-785-1670; www.nclr.org.
ACTIVIST CAMP - Youth Empowered Action (YEA) Camp will have sessions in July and August in Ben Lomond, CA; Portland, OR; Charlton, MA. YEA Camp is designed for activists 12-17 years old who want to make a difference.
Contact: firstname.lastname@example.org; http://yeacamp.org/.