China & Cars
Did you know GM sells more cars in China than the U.S.?
In March, GM sold 230,048 vehicles in China and 188,011 in the U.S. The U.S. auto giant is on pace to sell more than 2 million vehicles in China this year and 3 million by 2015.
"Overall auto sales in China rose 56% in March from a year earlier to a monthly record of 1.74 million units," reported the Wall Street Journal last week. Total Chinese vehicle sales may hit 17 million this year, more than the biggest year ever in the U.S.. (China surpassed the U.S. in auto sales last year but it was largely because of a massive downturn in the American market.)
Today a Beijing tourist is more likely to encounter a traffic jam than see the Forbidden City. In 2009 auto companies sold 13.6 million vehicles in China, thirteen times the total number of cars in circulation in 1990.
Thirty years ago the Chinese Communist Party began to reform the country's state dominated economy. State assets were sold, social entitlements cut, and consumerism unleashed. Capitalism was the new ideology. A decade on the government discovered that this required an automotive sector centered around the personal car.
The Chinese government understands, in the words of the Economist, that "the car industry more or less invented modern industrial capitalism." Which is why, according to the Financial Times; "China's car-centred model of development has been a mainstay of economic growth in recent years...the spin-off benefits from burgeoning car sales have been enormous. Each car requires several thousand parts, hundreds - if not thousands - of suppliers, roads, car parks, driving schools, petrol stations and other service industries."
For the past 75 years the automobile has been the number one source of capitalist profit. An industry with a voracious and varied appetite, automakers are among the leading consumers of copper, aluminum, plastics, iron, lead, rubber, textiles, vinyl, computer chips and steel. 9 of the world's 10 biggest corporations in 2007 were car and oil companies (Walmart, the largest, is highly dependent on the private automobile).
The Communist Party has worked vigorously for China to join this capitalist heaven.
In 1994, the auto industry was named one of five "pillar industries" by the government. "The Chinese government wants to emulate America's rise to industrial glory by making the car industry a pillar of economic growth," noted the Economist.
To prop up this pillar, state banks have invested billions of dollars in car manufacturing. There are now automotive factories in almost all of China's 31 provinces and last September, Wang Chuanfu, a "carmaker" became China's richest man.
An indirect subsidy to the auto industry, 100s of billions of dollars in public money has been pumped into road construction. "Since the 1990s," reported the Economist, "China has built an expressway network crisscrossing the country that is second only to America's interstate highway system in length." Between 1998 and 2008 30,000 miles of expressway were built.
Cars are literally shaping the physical lansdscape. Historic neighbourhoods have been torn to the ground to build new roads. A forest of roadside billboards have sprung up and the sprawling outskirts of major cities have undergone complete makeovers as big box retailers such as Wal-Mart move in.
By 2018 5 million people are expected to move to Shanghai's suburbs. A source of inspiration for this suburban shift is one of the world's most sprawling cities. In early 2008 a delegation of Chinese government officials, architects and bankers toured the outskirts of Phoenix. USA Today reported, "Members of the group studied the streetscape, the golf course, the spa, the cyber cafe, the healthcare amenities and the design of the single family homes at Sun City Festival, a 3000 acre, planned community for people over 55."
In a country that has two hundred million bicycles, cities such as Shanghai have banned them from many streets. The Washington Post explained in December: "Major streets boasted wide bike lanes, sidewalks carried ample parking space for bikes and bikes usually had the right of way at intersections [in China]. But lately, public space for bicycles has been shrinking under the tyranny of the car."
Cars need a highly controlled environment where everyone follows their rules. To enforce these rules, especially when the car is new, it takes repression. "Traffic police," reported Shanghai Daily, "want to publicly shame jaywalkers and cyclists who violate traffic rules by displaying photographs and videos of their offences in newspapers and on TV." (Early in U.S. automotive history 6 and 7 year olds were arrested for continuing to play on New York's streets.)
Those lucky enough to escape public shame may not be so lucky when riding their bikes, walking or taking public transit - still the most popular modes of transportation. China has the highest number of crash deaths of any country, with 100,000 people dying annually in recent years. And the victims are often non-car users, which has stoked rising bitterness over the growing class divide in Chinese society where a minority of the population has accrued the benefits from the shift towards capitalism. A manifestation of this class divide is the rising dominance of the car at the expense of other transportation methods. For non-car drivers -the 500 million who get by with less than two dollars a day, among others - transportation is becoming more dangerous and as cars congest routes, more time consuming.
Cars have not only affected the domestic landscape they are changing China's role in the world. Increased resource requirements have led Chinese companies to scour the globe for commodities, no matter the ecological costs. Two weeks ago, for instance, a Chinese company bought a $4.6 billion stake in Alberta's Tar Sands, which is among the world's dirtiest sources of oil.
Until the mid-1990s China was oil self-sufficient, a position that has changed dramatically. China is now the number two consumer of oil worldwide and the country has been responsible for a great deal of the world's total oil growth in recent years. With less than two percent of the world's oil reserves, most of its growing needs will be imported.
The Communist Party is increasingly concerned over the security of the country's oil supply, as demonstrated by this week's $20 billion oil agreement with Venezuela and the launch of the National Strategic Oil Reserves Office. China is in fact correct to be worried about its oil supply. Some say the invasion of Iraq was meant to enhance U.S control over the Middle East's black gold in light of a rapidly expanding Chinese appetite. Elsewhere, reports the Washington Post, "The United States is building a network of military bases and diplomatic missions whose main goal is to protect American access to oil fields in volatile places such as Nigeria, Cameroon, Chad and tiny Sao Tome and, as important, to deny that access to China."
Fifteen years ago automobiles in China guzzled about 10 percent of the country's much smaller total oil usage. Today cars and light trucks consume about forty percent of all China's oil. So long as the country continues along the North American 'development' path, there's no reason to believe that cars won't someday consume half of the country's oil. The ecological consequences will become increasingly severe.
The further into the future we peer, the more frightening the implications become. North America has already proved that a car culture severely damages the environment. Cars leak lead battery acid, brake fuel and anti-freeze, all of which seep into the earth. Brake pads house asbestos and air conditioners exhale ozone-depleting coolants. The rubber from tires takes centuries to decompose and entire eco-systems have been exterminated
by expanding auto infrastructure. Cars also emit large amounts of CO2. As Jane Kay Holtz put it so aptly in Asphalt Nation, "the automobile's abuse overruns our capacity to record it."
It is crucial to consider the direction of the recent surge in automobility. Currently, China has some 40 vehicles per thousand residents, while Western Europe has about 590, and the US 950. With a population of roughly a billion more people than that of the U.S., China clearly has the potential to absorb many more cars.
Chinese environmentalist Liang Congjie does the math and describes the threat to human survival that the car now poses; "If each Chinese family has two cars like U.S. families, then the cars needed by China, something like 600 million vehicles, will exceed all the cars in the world combined. That would be the greatest disaster for mankind." Simply put, the day their future looks like our present, we're done for.
If China is following our lead, perhaps its time we get off this road to environmental ruin.
"Stop Signs: Cars and Capitalism on the road to Economic, Social and Environmental Decay" by Bianca Mugyenyi and Yves Engler will be published in early 2011. Anyone interested in organizing a talk as part of a book tour please e-mail: kabibi@riseup.net
Yves Engler's most recent book is Canada and Israel: Building Apartheid. For more info: http://yvesengler.com/



Erroneous assumptions and multiple fallacies
By Mar, Pamela at Apr 27, 2010 17:11 PM
The post is a classic example of the US-centered notion that everybody in the world will act like Americans if only given the chance. Americans frequently are ignorant about the rest of the world and this post is a good example of the fact-free writing that results.
A number or erroneous assumptions and outright fallacies plague the piece. A few are noted below. I will use the US as a point of reference because it is cited in the first sentence.
Rising auto sales in China do not necessarily portend the same kind of environmental destruction that has resulted from the same trend in the US, for three reasons. First, Chinese use their cars significantly less frequently (eg hours or miles per week) and pack more people into them when they do. Americans use their vehicles as their main transportation whereas Chinese use their vehicles mainly for leisure, ie weekends and family outings. Second, the key driver behind the recent surge in auto sales in China was a government stimulus program that subsidized purchases of vehicles of 1.6 litres or less. The trend will slow when the subsidy is withdrawn. Lastly, most cars sold in china are fuel efficient models favored by consumers and with government encouragement. Indeed, fuel economy standards in China are now higher than they are in Europe and the US. For these reasons, the average emissions per car in China will be drastically less than in the US. Chinese are not mimicking the US because they see the damage that has arisen due to American SUV culture.
It is true that the new car industry in China is an example of capitalism, but I would argue that you cannot look at this without noting its Chinese characteristics. The auto industry represents a diversification of the economy, away from state control and towards private industry, and this is a highly positive factor – because it is creating a better life, more choices, and more individualism in China, all bound by government rules which are in the public interest. Indeed, China’s economic development is dependent on a diversification of the economy away from the state and towards the growth of greater consumption which represents people making choices about their life. Hence, greater home ownership and a degree of car ownership. BUT all within the framework set by the state.
The article also makes the mistake that Walmart in China is like Walmart in the US, ie car centric and suburban. In fact, the growth of Walmart in China is the exact opposite of its growth in the US. IN China, Walmart stores are overwhelmingly in the city center and accessed by customers using public transport. Clearly, the authors didn’t even bother to look at Walmart’s store map in China, which reflects the fact that most Chinese don’t have cars yet. So why would Walmart build stores that are only accessible by car?
The author points tries to substantiate her argument by pointing to China’s massive road building programme, neglecting to mention that while China has indeed invested heavily in roads, it has invested greater amounts on building high speed rail. Anyone who has a degree of familiarity will know that the highways are primarily used, and meant to be used, for freight and intercity buses, but that the majority of passenger travel will be by high speed rail. China now has more high speed rail than the US, and when the currently planned lines are completed, could resemble parts of Europe or Japan.
As the authors point out, China has greatly increased its consumption of commodities and oil – although much of this is for buildings (which are improving the lives of ordinary citizens) or to fuel the export economy, ie. Goods that are destined for the US or Europe. Why should China be condemned for resource that are primarily dedicated to serving Western consumption?
In addition, China is investing heavily in diversifying its energy supply to clean sources, and surpassed the US in terms of investment in clean technology even though its economy is one fourth the size of the US. China has also pledged to increase renewable energy from 7% (of total) currently to 15% by 2020. It has also mandated that electricity suppliers draw from the renewable grid as demand increases. What about the US? Lastly, China has had a national climate change policy since 2006 – whereas the US government prefers to go to war rather than reduce national dependence on oil.
In short, China has made a number of moves that demonstrate that it will not adopt the flagrant and selfish habits of American politicians and consumers. Unlike the US, China learns from the past. Rising auto sales and the population in China (and the Asian population in general) are not the primary drivers of climate change or environmental destruction. Today the US with 5% of the world population produces 25% of global CO2 emissions and is the world’s largest importer of oil. Those who wish to deny China the chance to demonstrate that growth can take place in an environmentally aware and clean(er) framework than has previously occurred in the history of the human race should examine their own houses before casting stones at China.
Reply this comment
Capitalism and Cars
By Bluhm, Richard at Apr 27, 2010 15:43 PM
Rational deliberations are as impossible in the China as they are in the United States. Strategies for enrichment are undertaken because the can be and not because they should be. Upton Sinclair's words to the effect that it is so hard to learn when we're being paid (enriched) not to would seem to apply. It's interesting how this multi-headed beast, this Hydra of the car culture, grows and multiplies similarly in the two biggest polluters. It must be that the forms of governance in each are very much alike. The Chinese are just a little more forthright about their authoritarianism.
Reply this comment