Community Media: The Thriving Voice of the Venezuelan People
In
The 1999 Constitution of the
The Organic Telecommunications Law, which was passed in June 2000, states that there are three types of broadcast media in
Although the Constitution of Venezuela recognizes community media, prior to the April 2002 coup against the Chávez government, these small television, radio and newspaper resources did not receive much attention from the state. While the community media normally supported the Chávez government, active support was not provided. At first, the primary goals of community centers were the right to exist and operate openly in society. Before Chávez was elected president, participating in community media was a clandestine activity and a victimized form of freedom of speech; homes and offices that housed community radio stations were often raided and operators feared for their lives. Community media stations have since multiplied, amplifying the voices of individuals and communities, increasing community communication and cohesion, fostering cultural awareness and political participation, and increasingly meeting the positive freedom of speech rights of Venezuelans. A new form of participatory communication based on local experiential knowledge is gaining popularity and influence.[4]
Despite the strong foundation community media has in the Venezuelan Constitution and laws, community media is still a relatively new voice evolving into an active forum for the democratic and revolutionary process of the Venezuelan people. Community media has become a necessary alternative because it is made and controlled by the people. After the failed coup attempt, the government realized how crucial community media is to the people and to the State. It became apparent that the state media cannot be the only alternative to the private media because of its relatively low ratings and its consolidated nature that make it completely vulnerable in a coup situation. When Channel 8, the state run television channel, was taken off the air during the coup in April 2002, most Venezuelans were denied accurate coverage of the events. The coup was defeated with the help of community media stations and activists; they rallied their communities together to take to the streets and demand that their voices be heard.[5]
In stark contrast to corporate media that creates a dominant ideological framework, community media is an instrument of ideological formation that harmonizes with the democratic, social and economic progress occurring in
The next step in the process was decisive: the activists in the struggle for water, in the ‘asamblea popular
CatiaTV and other community TV stations engage in the struggle for liberation from the corruption of private media with a critical, self-critical and class-consciousness perspective because participation comes from within the communities. According to the CatiaTV Collective, "community media works to democratize communication, affecting the necessary separation of the medium and the message."[7]
Community media activists created a National Association of Alternative and Community Media (ANMCLA) in response to the extreme difficulties the community media stations faced when trying to obtain authorization through the National Commission of Telecommunications (CONATEL). Carlos Carles, a journalist with Radio Perola in
proposed techniques of demonstrating statistical data. Against this, we proposed local knowledge, oral narrative, historical memory, and the everyday work of the community. As a result of this difference, we entered into a major debate, and we completely rejected the legal component of the proposal made by the Chávez government.[8]
With ANMCLA, a community can authorize a station and legalize it themselves. There is no such thing as an illegal station because everyone has the constitutional right to communication and freedom of expression.
Community media is democratic media. Vigorous citizen participation is needed from the bottom up and it operates according to the needs and wants of the public. A clear difference is understood and made between citizens and consumers; the viewer is seen as a "protagonist" rather than a consumer, the prominent portrayal of viewers in private media.[9] The community media movement promotes public ownership and control of resources such as public rights over the air waves, the radio and TV spectrum, and communication infrastructures are supported. Democratic media concern themselves with the civil and human rights of all media participants - media producers must be free from government and commercial interference and free to innovate and present controversial issues. Because the programming comes directly from the community, the content is truly democratic and inclusive.
In addition to providing a meaningful space for community communication, community radio and television stations can be a space to keep local culture and traditions alive. Paraguaipoa, the first indigenous community radio station located in the state of Táchira, is now one of nine indigenous community radio stations in
Our children turn on the radio, and they hear their aunt, their friend's mother, their older sister and her friends. They hear stories from the mouths of those who know the community and what we need. And they hear our language. All of this makes the children proud and eager to participate, and it gives our own community some of the power we lost to the lies of the media stations.[10]
The private media fails to report the great successes of community media because, despite their small size, these stations pose a serious threat to those who are in control of the information that mainstream
Community media is a strong, promising and essential step toward democratizing Venezuelan society, but the road there isn't necessarily a smooth one. There are many challenges that lie ahead. To begin, community media is still a small mobilization- one that the majority of Venezuelans do not take part in.[11] Venezuelans must reject this dependence on private media sources and begin to participate within their community. Without the direct participation of the people, there is no alternative voice to the dominant media in
There has been some criticism over government funding of community media. Because many stations were only legalized under Chávez, and the majority receives governmental funding, many have voiced concerns of government intervention or pressure concerning content.[12] ECOS radio, the station for Barrio Pueblo Nuevo in Mérida, occupied an abandoned building for three years before it was expropriated by the government and they received the title. Now, they share the space with the barrio's community center, often using the radio for community organizing. Although the station has benefited from the expropriation of their building, the legalization of their station under the radio and telecommunications act, and the donation of equipment, ECOS is in no way under the control of Chavez.
We believe it is important to work for the revolution that is working for us, but we often express criticisms of el proceso bolivariano...of course the state has played a large role in the implementation of the social programs, but there are many movements, many great things that come directly from the community here and that is what she share here at ECOS.[13]
This sentiment has also been expressed by Chávez. When Catia TV was officially legalized, he urged the community media center to speak out on issues important to the community and hold the government accountable to their promises, welcoming criticism.[14]
Community media stations are ensuring true freedom of speech and expression in
The case of
Community media in
Notes
[1] Raby, D. L. Democracy and Revolution
[2]
[3] Global Legal Information Network. 02 June 2009 <http://www.glin.gov/view.action?glinID=73319>.
[4] Kozloff, Nikolas. "Chávez Launches Hemispheric, "Anti-Hegemonic" Media Campaign in Response to Local TV Networks' Anti-Government Bias." Council on Hemispheric Affairs. 28 Apr. 2005. 02 June 2009 <http://www.coha.org/2005/04/chavez-launches-hemispheric-%
[5] Kozloff, Nikolas. "Chávez Launches Hemispheric, "Anti-Hegemonic" Media Campaign in Response to Local TV Networks' Anti-Government Bias." Council on Hemispheric Affairs. 28 Apr. 2005. 02 June 2009 <http://www.coha.org/2005/04/chavez-launches-hemispheric-%
[6] Podur, Justin. "Venezuelan TV for and by the Communities."
[7] CatiaTV Collective. "Catia TVe, Television From, By and For the People."
[8] Fernandes, Sujatha. "Growing Movement of Community Radio in
[9] Gomez, Luis. "Media Constructed From Below."
[10] Hernandez, Angela. "Los Consejos Comunales." Personal interview. 3 Feb. 2009
[11] Wilpert, Gregory. "Community Media in
[12] Wilpert, Gregory. "Community Media in
[13] ECOS Radio. "Community Media." Personal interview. 30 Jan. 2009.
[14] CatiaTV Collective. "Catia TVe, Television From, By and For the People."
[15] Golinger, Eva. "A Case Study of Media Concentration and Power in



Community Media: The Thriving Voice of the Venezuelan People.
By Carty, Antonio at Aug 03, 2009 18:12 PM
Thanks for the article!
I continue to be inspired by the community media been described in Venezuela! The way it is spreading & growing in communities, finding the voices & creators of the media in the different generations of a communities people & letting those people grow in experience & confidence in their own voices. This is part of the overall improvment to democracy in Venezuela. The government of Chavez has an appetite for the voice & rule of the people! This is not prevented in my country,but as in many so called developed democracies free media (pirate media!) is not encouraged here or made provision for much by our state and it is not inviting to peoples participation.
I spoke for a while on one of the only sort of community radio stations in the capital of Ireland,Dublin city. I enjoyed the experience of finding my voice & thoughts becoming communicated to the community. I felt more responsible about my words & I felt liberated over the confusion of events happening without participation & direct meaning with me. By talking together about things that are, those things become recognised & exposed to a better collective scrutiny. I was removed from this show after half a year on pretext that I might mention something that would get the station sued! This would not happen in the alive democracy Venezuela has in its community media because free communication is a right. Of course I was not abusing the show to speak invented information or slander people. What led to my removal was I fell into a little debate with a priest on air about a news story at time and the stations managers mother or the church press office on the hotline didnt like it! I also recklessly (aparently!) quoted an artist in the trenches of world war one who had drawn a doodle of harvesting blades moving down stick figure people. They only believed in familiar superficialy respectful & fully commercial styles of communicators coming up tru the ranks here- I felt! The Irish people & I imagine most other developed countries would become alot better to live in if our democracies organs & lungs were developed in community radio, print & television as a right of democratic expression. To draw people in to free expression about their lives & communities & society.
I think its also vital ( as was so clearly put in the article I'm commenting on here) that bigger country wide t.v. stations in Venezuela start drawing on community media as organic local sources to enhance & better inform & develop their news. This co-ordination ensures the crops of the peoples communication finds its full audiance & purpose for the people of Venezuela!
Thanks for reading my voice!
Antonio Carty.
Znet Sustainer- Dublin, Ireland.
Reply this comment