Zcom_simple

Hello,

Blogs are a familiar feature on the internet - where users post content in an accumulating manner, with comments, and search options, etc. They facilitate expression and exploration, and via attached comments, also debate and synthesis.


Reading and
Navigating Blogs

Our blogs are quite powerful. Each writer can post, as is typically the case. Sustainers who have the option can also post, however. All Blogs appear in the blog system, and sometimes also in content boxes the top page of ZNet - and always via the left menu of the top page - and can be found via searches, etc.

Commenting on blogs follows the blogs, attached at the bottom, and blog comments, like all others, are also visible in many places that show comments including in the forum system. In addition, the entire blog system gathers content for everyone - but one can look at the accumulating content in many ways.

  • For example one can look at one writer's efforts - so one is seeing what is effectively a blog system for that one writer, or Sustainer.
  • One can also look at the content by topic, seeing blogs that are tagged as being about a certain topic - or place, as well. Thus, when doing that, it is a blog system about a topic, or a place, with many contributors.
  • One can look at only writer blogs, or only sustainer blogs, as well.
  • One can look at blogs for particular Groups, too.

All this is easily done using the left menu. Searches allow even more variables and refinements.


Creating Blog Posts

If you are a Sustainer with permission, and are logged in, you will see a link in the left menu for you to post a blog - and you can use that to post one, and then tag it various ways (such as with a topic or place, or a group tag), and once you do, it is in the system with you as the author.

You can also use the console button to the left to post a blog - anytime and from anywhere in the site, as long as you are logged in.

Meanwhile, enjoy the blogs - and, by the way, if you are a Free Member or a Sustainer with a ZSpace page, of course you can put one or more content boxes on it, pulling blog links of any sort you may want to filter for, for example, by you or by your friends or by others - and by topic, about places, for groups, etc.

Blogs

Courts in a Parpolity

By Michael McGehee at Apr 20, 2009


Change Text Size a- | A+

[I posted this in the forum and sent a message to to Stephen Shalom.  I decided to put it in blog form so that more can see it and possibly respond.]

Stephen,

 

In Albert's book Realizing Hope he mentions the difficulty of reforming the court system to compliment a Good Society. I was thinking specifically about judges and lawyers. I could imagine doing away with [the role of] judges but radically reforming the role of lawyers.  [Since udges have strong lawyer backgrounds they could utlize their legal skills the same way I propose for lawyers.]

As I understand it, one big problem with lawyers today is they have an incentive to win court cases regardless of the truth, innocence or guilt of their clients.  I wanted to think of a process by which lawyers are removed from a privatized system and whose incentives are to compile evidence and legal facts to present to jurors for deliberating the result of a case in an honest fashion that seeks truth and justice.

My thought was to reform lawyers into something like an Iteration Facilitation Board.  As you know, in parecon the IFB facilitates planning between consumers and workers.  In parpolity a Legal Facilitation Board (LFB for lack of a better name at this time) could facilitate between plaintiffs, defendants and jurors.

Since they do not represent anyone and have no incentive to "win" one problem is resolved.  The other problem I thought of was, "What IS their incentive?"  Any plaintiff or defendant could appeal a ruling, which could proceed to another jury body [and LFB] for review.  If a particular legal LFB has too many successful appeals against them this could effect their jobs.  So the incentive for the LFB is to provide as clear and accurate information as possible or stand to lose their jobs to others that could prove to be better qualified.

What do you think?

~ Michael

Loading_border