Despoiling Arctic Refuge
Despoiling Arctic Refuge
From 1974 to 1977 the Mackenzie Valley Pipeline inquiry was conducted by Thomas R Berger, making final recommendations to not construct a pipeline in the Porcupine caribou herd calving grounds along the border with
In the case of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, the Republican dominated US Senate has snuck an amendment to the budget into legislation that will allow oil companies to begin drilling perhaps as early as this year in the refuge. Not only is this in violation of international agreements that the US has with Canada regarding this, it is also a direct act of cultural genocide on the Gwitch’in people-- a nation that exists on both sides of the border, still eat 75% of their diet from subsistence sources, and who are strategically placed along the migration routes of the porcupine herd. They, like the caribou, are a migratory people who to the present are able to live with the land on a level not seen in the south. To destroy this herd is not only to destroy the last great herd of mammals that migrate in their hundreds of thousands, it will wipe out a people.
As far as the Mackenzie Valley pipeline, Imperial Oil, who the territorial government is tasking (in Orwellian fashion) with the environmental impact assessment as well as the consultation process itself, is working with the GNWT to open “pipeline readiness offices†in major centres across Denendeh. In an about face of the precedents set during the Berger Inquiry, Imperial Oil is not holding hearings in the various communities that are to be effected; only Hay River, Inuuvik and Yellowknife are holding public forums. Again, in direct contrast to the Berger inquiry, the hearings are being held only in English, and not being translated into the many Dene dialects or Inuktitut. During the Berger inquiry, environmental groups, individuals, communities and even anthropologists were able to secure funding to parallel that of the oil and gas companies in order to conduct social, cultural and environmental impact assessments independently. This time around, only the community
For all of these reasons and more, the “progress†of gas and oil in the north are massive acts of bad faith, direct violations of sovereign nation territory and are leading to an environmental and social disaster. These disastrous acts are preventable, and are for the good of petroleum corporations who are not making sufficient profits in


