To:

Zcom_simple
Home » ZMag » Ted Glick » Dump Bush, Build Independent Politics
?1295269164

August 2003

Volume , Number 0
Activism

There are no articles.

Commentary

There are no articles.

Culture

There are no articles.

Features

Quiddity
Tim Wise


Media Matters
Danny Schechter


Biotechnology
Jesse Reynolds


Lesson
Sandra Mathison


Civil Liberties
Sue Katz


Fog Watch
Edward Herman


Campaign 2004
Ted Glick


Democratic Workplaces
Mischa Gaus


Hearts & Minds
Ashraf Farim


Brewing
Sean Dunne


Occupation
Alex Doherty


Repression
Nick Dearden


Law Enforcement
Jim Cornehls


Interview
Naima Bouteldja


Pharmaceuticals
Lynne Born


Asia
Jan knippers Black


Conservative Watch
Bill Berkowitz


Labor Organizing
Ricky Baldwin


Campaign 2004
Ted Glick


Zaps

There are no articles.

NOTE: Z Magazine subscribers and sustainers have access to all Z Magazine articles here and in the archive. The latest Z Magazine articles available to everyone are listed in the Free Articles box at the top of the table of contents, and are starred in the list below. Questions? e-mail Z Magazine Online.

Dump Bush, Build Independent Politics

By Ted Glick
PDF Version
Printer Friendly Version
August 2003
 Change Text Size a- | A+

I t’s a fact—there is a broadly- based, independent progressive movement in this country. It is by no means as coherent as it needs to become, but there are hundreds of thousands of people around the country who see themselves as activists for social change who are clear that neither the Democrats nor the Republicans are the answer for the crises we are facing today. 

Many of these people are members of the Green Party or the Labor Party or one of several local or state “third parties” around the country—the Progressive Party in Vermont, the United Citizens Party in South Carolina, Progressive Dane in Wisconsin, the Peace and Freedom Party in California, the Mountain Party in West Virginia, the Green-Rainbow Party in Massachusetts, the Working Families Party in New York, or others. Probably more independent activists are not members of one of these parties, for various reasons. But these people tend to vote independent on election day and to speak up in opposition to the corrupt and depressing reality of our corporate-dominated, two-party political system. 

Just about all of us, I would guess, participated in the historic, worldwide, pre-war peace movement late last year and early this year. That movement brought out upwards of a couple of million people in this country to at least one street demonstration over that period of time. 

Now, two months after that war was supposedly ended—or, more accurately, that “battle” in the planned on-going war—the Bush administration is facing serious problems. They are contending with growing insurgencies in both Iraq and Afghanistan. Their lies about Iraq’s “weapons of mass destruction” have been exposed and could blow up in their faces. Combined with a sputtering economy and massive federal indebtedness two years after a multi-trillion dollar surplus, there are ample grounds to expect Bush’s poll num- bers to continue to slide. 

Those of us in the independent progressive movement can help this process along. We can build a significantly stronger mass popular movement over the next 16 months leading up to the November 4, 2004 election. What should be the major objectives for our movement over that period of time? In my view, there are three: (1) replacing Bush with a Democrat (since we’re not yet strong or organized enough to replace him with a Green or an independent); (2) seeing the Republicans lose control of at least one house of Congress; and (3) contributing to these objectives in a way which maintains our political independence, keeps the Green Party (and others) out there nationally as a visible political player, and strengthens our unity and org- anization.  

It is critical that we not get absorbed into the Democratic Party. We need to function independently because we cannot depend on that big money-dominated institution, left to its own devices, to accomplish either or both of those first two objectives. We also need to function independently because we all know that whoever is in office come January 20, 2005, we need a strong and more unified independent progressive movement to press for genuine, positive, fundamental change. 

Here are some proposals for how we can best accomplish these three objectives: 

  • Truth Squads Wherever Bush Goes: When Bush—or others from his campaign—are speaking publicly, we should be there, in the largest numbers we can mobilize, as visibly as possible. 
  • Register The “Sleeping Giant” : The “sleeping giant” for our movement is those potential voters—50 percent of them—who are so turned off that they don’t come out and vote. We need to do organized voter registration among the disaffected. 
  • Popular Education: We need to put together educational materials that are accessible and understandable. What about the organizing of people’s theatre groups to perform wherever there are people? What about dump-Bush concerts where voter registration and sign-ups for grassroots organizing are prominently pushed? 
  • Button-Wearing: We should all be wearing anti-Bush buttons everywhere we go, as much as possible. We need mass visibility of anti-Bush sentiment. 
  • Pump Up August 29, 2004 : Coming out of the June United for Peace and Justice’s national conference, it looks as if this could become a day that “The World Says No to Bush,” the way February 15 was a day the world said no to war.  
  • Defend The Vote: The so-called “Help America Vote Act” requires every state to computerize, centralize, and purge voter roles before 2004. This opens up the possibility of more Jeb Bush/ Katherine Harris-type purges of black or other non-Republican voters in Republican-controlled states. We need to stay on top of these issues in various states. 
  • Local Unity-Building : We must work to counter hostility between Greens and other third partyies and rank-and-file progressive Democrats, people who are in agreement on issues, but who may disagree tactically over what to do as far as electoral politics. 
  • Safe-States Green Party
    Presidential Campaign:     The Greens should run a presidential candidate and put her or him on the ballot in as many states as possible. The tactics of that campaign should concentrate resources in those 30-35 states where it is known well in advance whether Bush or the Democrat is going to win that state’s electoral votes. 

We have 16 months to accomplish these goals. This is more than enough time if we apply our collective energies, intelligence, and dedication in a way commensurate with both the urgency and the promise of this coming period.  

Ted Glick is the National Coordinator of the Independent Progressive Politics Network (www.ippn.org), although these ideas are solely his.

Loading_border