Zcom_simple

Hello,

Blogs are a familiar feature on the internet - where users post content in an accumulating manner, with comments, and search options, etc. They facilitate expression and exploration, and via attached comments, also debate and synthesis.


Reading and
Navigating Blogs

Our blogs are quite powerful. Each writer can post, as is typically the case. Sustainers who have the option can also post, however. All Blogs appear in the blog system, and sometimes also in content boxes the top page of ZNet - and always via the left menu of the top page - and can be found via searches, etc.

Commenting on blogs follows the blogs, attached at the bottom, and blog comments, like all others, are also visible in many places that show comments including in the forum system. In addition, the entire blog system gathers content for everyone - but one can look at the accumulating content in many ways.

  • For example one can look at one writer's efforts - so one is seeing what is effectively a blog system for that one writer, or Sustainer.
  • One can also look at the content by topic, seeing blogs that are tagged as being about a certain topic - or place, as well. Thus, when doing that, it is a blog system about a topic, or a place, with many contributors.
  • One can look at only writer blogs, or only sustainer blogs, as well.
  • One can look at blogs for particular Groups, too.

All this is easily done using the left menu. Searches allow even more variables and refinements.


Creating Blog Posts

If you are a Sustainer with permission, and are logged in, you will see a link in the left menu for you to post a blog - and you can use that to post one, and then tag it various ways (such as with a topic or place, or a group tag), and once you do, it is in the system with you as the author.

You can also use the console button to the left to post a blog - anytime and from anywhere in the site, as long as you are logged in.

Meanwhile, enjoy the blogs - and, by the way, if you are a Free Member or a Sustainer with a ZSpace page, of course you can put one or more content boxes on it, pulling blog links of any sort you may want to filter for, for example, by you or by your friends or by others - and by topic, about places, for groups, etc.

Blogs

EvilDoers & DoGooders 4: The Big Myth

By Andy Dunn at Aug 28, 2004


Change Text Size a- | A+

As regards the mythology of moral dualism, I just wanted to touch on the obvious, the garden of eden. Here it was the forbidden tree of knowledge that would allow us to differentiate between good and evil.

This relationship of knowledge to moral duality is the idea I tried to develop that abstract thinking is at least strongly related to idealized, ultimate polar extremes--as opposed to (see, it's embedded) a physical world of only relative or limited polarities. The points I want to make related to this deal with a few of the assertions of mythologist Joseph Campbell, that: (1) similar such myths about the origin of knowledge are far more universal than our “jealous” judeo-chistian-islamic god would have us know--appearing in africa, asia, and the americas; and (2) that in almost every other version of the myth, the gift of abstract thinking abilities through a serpent and/or plant is seen as a positive development, and not a moral catastrophe. The indirect relation of all this to contemporary politics is, in my opinion, that both the myth and history surrounding absolutist morality theologies creates a tendency towards anti-intellectualism, intolerance, and an acute and hypocritical proclivity to project onto others the “evil/other” which we deny as existing within ourselves (anti-oneness). Certainly this is pronounced in hawkish U.S. liberals, but it is actually a defining characteristic of neo-conservative ideologues like Bush & Co, as I see it. More importantly, as it lies unexamined in the very precepts of what and how most of us are taught everything from the earliest age, I think it has broad import if one hopes to address significant societal or political change. A final note: what little I'm trying to do with these current blogs, which reflects my thinking on the matter over a period of time, is reason my way through an argument that might be direct enough (with a paring down of the blarney terms) to get through to someone who is deep within this mindframe... to get such a person to do the near impossible, to reconsider her/his worldview, and its negative implications and political effects. ZNet is fertile ground primarily for people who are already like-minded, but I'm just rambling about stuff here that I might develop further and somehow try to employ later. I also greatly appreciate the comments I've been getting.

Person

By Cra008, Peeperkorn at Aug 28, 2004 11:52 AM

"...that in almost every other version of the myth, the gift of abstract thinking abilities through a serpent and/or plant is seen as a positive development, and not a moral catastrophe." For an example, see the wikipedia: Gnosticism link in my response to Andy's last entry in this series. From their summary of basic tenets: "Soon after the creation of the physical world, Sophia sends a message by way of the Serpent. She gives gnosis to the humans this way, which causes the wrath of the Demiurge, who believes himself to be the sole creator of the universe and the exclusive ruler of this world. The "original sin" thus is in a gnostic context the "original enlightenment" and not an act of sin at all..." In or out of context, this stuff is puzzling, more so than the quote shows. But it's just one of several ways I could illustrate Andy's (above) point, without trying too hard. Reading those apocrypha today, I saw tremendous emphasis on light/dark, male/female, above/below, good/evil, material/spiritual: but often in unfamiliar ways. Our dualities aren't as black and white as we think :)

Reply this comment

Loading_border