Zcom_simple

Hello,

Blogs are a familiar feature on the internet - where users post content in an accumulating manner, with comments, and search options, etc. They facilitate expression and exploration, and via attached comments, also debate and synthesis.


Reading and
Navigating Blogs

Our blogs are quite powerful. Each writer can post, as is typically the case. Sustainers who have the option can also post, however. All Blogs appear in the blog system, and sometimes also in content boxes the top page of ZNet - and always via the left menu of the top page - and can be found via searches, etc.

Commenting on blogs follows the blogs, attached at the bottom, and blog comments, like all others, are also visible in many places that show comments including in the forum system. In addition, the entire blog system gathers content for everyone - but one can look at the accumulating content in many ways.

  • For example one can look at one writer's efforts - so one is seeing what is effectively a blog system for that one writer, or Sustainer.
  • One can also look at the content by topic, seeing blogs that are tagged as being about a certain topic - or place, as well. Thus, when doing that, it is a blog system about a topic, or a place, with many contributors.
  • One can look at only writer blogs, or only sustainer blogs, as well.
  • One can look at blogs for particular Groups, too.

All this is easily done using the left menu. Searches allow even more variables and refinements.


Creating Blog Posts

If you are a Sustainer with permission, and are logged in, you will see a link in the left menu for you to post a blog - and you can use that to post one, and then tag it various ways (such as with a topic or place, or a group tag), and once you do, it is in the system with you as the author.

You can also use the console button to the left to post a blog - anytime and from anywhere in the site, as long as you are logged in.

Meanwhile, enjoy the blogs - and, by the way, if you are a Free Member or a Sustainer with a ZSpace page, of course you can put one or more content boxes on it, pulling blog links of any sort you may want to filter for, for example, by you or by your friends or by others - and by topic, about places, for groups, etc.

Blogs

Ian Sinclair's Blog

Web Address: http://www.zcommunications.org/zspace/iansinclair
Bio: I am the author of the book 'The march that shook Blair: An oral history of 15 February 2003', published by Peace News Press: http://peacenews.info/node/7085/march-shook-blair-oral-h... (More)

All Sinclair Blogs

Exchange with Guardian journalist about US drone strikes

By Ian Sinclair at Jan 02, 2010


Change Text Size a- | A+

Below is an email exchange I had with the Guardian’s Declan Walsh (declan.walsh@guardian.co.uk) regarding Pakistani public opinion and the continuing US drone strikes.

 

 

Email to Declan Walsh on 28 December 2009:

 

Dear Declan

 

I was interested to read your recent article in the Guardian ‘US forces mounted secret Pakistan raids in hunt for al-Qaida’ (http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/dec/21/us-forces-secret-pakistan-raids).

 

There was a lot of valuable information in your report, but I was baffled by your assertion that Pakistani “public opinion has grudgingly tolerated CIA-led drone strikes in the tribal areas” of Pakistan.

 

I am aware of three recent public opinion polls conducted in Pakistan on this issue.

 

-          “Nearly three-fourths of poll respondents said they oppose U.S. military action against al Qaeda and the Taliban inside Pakistan” according to a September 2007 Terror Free Tomorrow/D3 Systems poll (http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/09/11/poll.pakistanis/index.html)

 

-          An August 2009 Al-Jazeera/Gallup Pakistan poll found 67% of respondents “oppose drone attacks by the United States against Taliban and al-Qaeda targets in Pakistan” (http://english.aljazeera.net/focus/2009/08/2009888238994769.html)

 

-          An October 2009 International Republican Institute poll found 73% of respondents oppose the “U.S. making military incursions in the tribal areas” and 76% do not think the “United States should partner with Pakistan in conducting drone attacks against extremists.” (http://www.iri.org/mena/pakistan/pdfs/2009_October_1_Survey_of_Pakistan_Public_Opinion_July_15-August_7_2009.pdf)

 

With the above results in mind could you tell me what percentage of the Pakistani population would have to be opposed to the US drone attacks for you to report them as such?

 

Kind regards

 

Ian Sinclair

 

 

Reply from Declan Walsh on 28 December 2009:

 

Dear Ian
I said the Pakistani public has tolerated - not supported - drone attacks, which is demonstrably true. I'm not sure the same would be true of american 'boots on the ground', which was the point of the comparison. We've previously reported public opinion on drone strikes.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/oct/30/clinton-pakistan-drone-attacks
bests
d

 

 

Reply to Declan Walsh on 29 December 2009:

 

Dear Declan
 
Thanks for your reply.
 
You say it is "demonstrably true" that the "Pakistani public has tolerated" the US drone attacks. 
 
This seems to be a very strange way of interpreting the three polls that show around 70 percent of Pakistanis oppose the US drone attacks. What would the Pakistani public have to do to actually oppose the attacks, and be reported as opposing the attacks, in your eyes?
 
I note that it was widely reported in early 2003 the majority of the British public opposed the invasion of Iraq (see http://www.ipsos-mori.com/newsevents/ca/ca.aspx?oItemId=287).  Would you also describe the British public of "tolerating" the invasion?
 
Kind regards
 
Ian

Loading_border