Zcom_simple

Hands Off Social Security




Change Text Size a- | A+


Social Security cuts under consideration by the White House in deficit-reduction talks would drive 245,000 people into poverty and lower widows’ benefits $1,200 a year by 2050, according to Social Security Administration calculations provided to Sen. Bernie Sanders.  Changing the way inflation is measured to determine Social Security benefits is one option on the table in high-stakes budget negotiations that resume Sunday at the White House. Sanders called on President Barack Obama to publicly renounce the idea of cutting Social Security as part of any deal to lower deficits.

The so-called Chained Consumer Price Index on average results in a lower inflation levels than the more common formula used to adjust benefits.

“The result would be devastating cuts for millions of American seniors and people with disabilities,” said Sanders. As chairman of the Senate Subcommittee on Primary Health and Aging, Sanders asked the Social Security Administration’s Office of Retirement Policy to calculate the impact on poverty rates and benefits if the revised inflation gauge were to be adopted. 

In 2030, according to the report prepared for Sanders, there would be 173,400 more people living in poverty in the United States. The revised formula also would dramatically lower benefits for retirees. Widows would receive almost $70 a month less in benefits, a reduction of $840 a year. People who are 70-79 would receive $49 a month less, a drop of $588 a year. Benefits for those who are 80-89 would drop by $80/month or $960 a year. Benefits for women would fall by 3.5 percent overall while men’s benefits would drop by 2.9 percent.

By 2050, the impact would be much worse. There would be 245,000 more people living in poverty at mid-century. Widows’ benefits would be $1,200 a year less. Those 70-79 would lose $720 a year, and seniors in the 80-89 age bracket would see benefits fall by $1,200 a year. Overall, women would see a 4 percent reduction in benefits while benefits for men would drop 3.4 percent.

As the deficit negotiations were set to resume on Sunday, Sanders emphasized that Social Security has not contributed a dime to the deficit or the national debt. Funded by the payroll tax on workers and employers, Socials Security has a $2.6 trillion surplus and will be able to provide full benefits for every eligible American for the next 25 years.

"I am especially disturbed that the president is considering cuts in Social Security after he campaigned against cuts in 2008," Sanders said. "The American people expect the president to keep his word."

  

Dsc05889

What kind of country is this?

By Rissler, Mike at Jul 12, 2011 19:46 PM

I was born and lived most of my life in the U.S. and then almost 14 years ago began a career of working and teaching in Latin America.  It has not been easy, in fact, it is very demanding, but it has been a rich experience for many reasons.  Throughout those years I remained will informed about the U.S. but I also saw the impact of U.S. policies in that part of the world, too.  What an education!

This latest outrage against social security is something I never thought I would see, but it reflects the callousness and selfishness of the leadership class in a country that has more than enough to care for all of its citizens.

Listening to President Obama's self-serving and condescending remarks about how we all must sacrifice is pouring vinegar into wounds, or worse.  Yes, the right, the Republicans, are horrendous, but the Democrats are simply part of the same omnipresent conservative party that really does not care for the welfare of the whole country. 

Reply this comment

Loading_border