Zcom_simple




35

Has The Economy Been Pulled Back From The Brink? Who Is Recovering?




Change Text Size a- | A+


President Obama's highly anticipated health care speech started on a totally different subject: The economy.

"When I spoke here last winter, this nation was facing the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression, he told Congress and the peole at home. "We were losing an average of 700,000 jobs per month. Credit was frozen. And our financial system was on the verge of collapse." But," he went on, "thanks to the bold and decisive action we have taken since January, I can stand here with confidence and say that we have pulled this economy back from the brink."

Applause. Applause. Applause.

Are we back from the brink? And what brink is that? On Labor Day night, HBO featured a powerful documentary about a GM Plant in Ohio that was shutting down. It showed the workers, teary eyed and forlorn, making the last truck on  "their" assembly line. Their faces told the rest of the story as they asked themselves and each other, 'what do I do now? What happens to my family and my life?"

They had no answers, and neither, alas, does Barack Obama.

A "jobless recovery" will not give these workers the money to buy into even the cheapest health care option, public option or not.

Look around Mr. Obama: the unemployment rate in real terms is over 16%.  The consumer economy is shattered. The commercial real estate market is imploding, and, yes, more foreclosures are on the way according to the Washington Post:

"A new report foresees another wave of foreclosures, as option adjustable-rate mortgages-an entire class of specialized home loans-will soon reset to higher payments. Estimated to jump by 63 percent on average, the higher rates will likely push many of the already-strained loan recipients over the brink. The loans, also called pick-a-pay loans, are a prime example of the risky lending techniques that created the housing crisis: Borrowers were allowed to pay back the loan with as little as they wanted each month, though that meant many paid less than the interest due…the report says the fallout from the loans could be felt for years, especially in states already hit hard by foreclosures.

Just who is back from the brink?

If you listen to the Fed, the glass is more than half full; if you listen to economists like Simon Johnson, it's way more than half empty, as he wrote on Baseline Scenario:

"In the absence of effective financial regulation - i.e., both during the 1920s and again since 1990 - the Fed has operated in a manner that encourages the formation of sequential bubbles. This destabilization of our financial system is not a minor matter; the damage caused - human, financial, social - is already enormous." And we are very far from being done.

"Don't take my word for it." Lou Jiwei, the chairman of China's sovereign wealth fund said recently. "It will not be too bad this year. Both China and America are addressing bubbles by creating more bubbles and we're just taking advantage of that. So we can't lose."

Yes, We Can---lose, that is, Mr. Lou. And Yes We Are, Mr. Obama. The problem is that we are still in some Bernanke fantasyland, thinking that if we keep saying everything is ok, it will be.

Here's Washington's blog on real unemployment as opposed to what the Bureau of Labor Statistics is saying:

"… Paul Craig Roberts - former Assistant Secretary of the Treasury and former editor of the Wall Street Journal - and economist John Williams both said in December 2008 that - if the unemployment rate was calculated as it was during the Great Depression - the December 2008 unemployment figure would actually have been 17.5%. Williams says  that unemployment figures for July 2009 rose to 20.6% According to an article summarizing the projections of former International Monetary Fund Chief Economist and Harvard University Economics Professor Kenneth Rogoff and University of Maryland Economics Professor Carmen Reinhart, …unemployment could rise to 22% within the next 4 years or so."

Hello, Mr. President? Why can't you bring to the discussion of the economy the same passion and fact-based arguments that you brought to the health care debate? Why can't you propose serious reforms on the financial sector?  Why can't we jail the financial criminals?

The answer seems to be that Wall Street will be a far more tenacious and resourceful enemy than the health care industry perhaps because they already own much of the Congress.
Remember Senator Dick Durbin's comment, 'the bankers run the place."

Alan Blinder a former vice-chairman of the Fed fears that pressure for financial reform is losing steam in part because of the power of what he calls "The Mother Of All Lobbies." He writes, "in the case of financial reform, the money at stake is mind-boggling and one financial industry after another will go to the mat to fight any provision that might hurt it."

Obama acknowledged we are not out of the woods yet. (What woods?)But what are the likely consequences? How long can people live without anything coming in? How long can we live on upbeat projections?

"There is no doubt class antagonism is stewing," says the editor of the blog Naked Captalism. He expressed a fear of a reaction that will go way beyond flag-waving tea parties. "…I am concerned this behavior is setting the stage for another sort of extra-legal measure: violence. I have been amazed at the vitriol directed at the banking classes. Suggestions for punishment have included the guillotine (frequent), hanging, pitchforks, even burning at the stake. Tar and feathering appears inadequate, and stoning hasn't yet surfaced as an idea. And mind you, my readership is educated, older, typically well-off (even if less so than three years ago). The fuse has to be shorter where the suffering is more acute."

One is reminded of the title of that movie, "There will be blood." Rather than show contrition or compassion for its own victims, Wall Street is hoping to jack up its salaries and bonuses to pre-2007 levels. The men at the top are oblivious to the pain they helped cause. They are getting away with the crime of our time.

And the people-THE PEOPLE-who potentially can challenge all this by action on the ground are being mesmerized by the false hope that recovery is here or right around the corner. How long before they realize you can't eat optimistic speeches?


Mediachannel's News Dissector Danny Schechter's new book and film on Wall Street's "Crime of Our Time" is coming soon. See Newsdissector.com/plunder. Comments to dissector@mediachannel.org

35

Re: Has The Economy Been Pulled Back From The Brink? Who Is Recovering?

By Schechter, Danny at Sep 16, 2009 21:46 PM

Angie, Angie,,,,,Why the vicious tongue lashing? Why the contempt and attitude of superiority?

You want to debate? Fine.  Let's debate but know that I have been calling for a "jail out" since 2007.  See my book PLUNDER all my Z NET posts. Please also check out my new book THE CRIME OF OUR TIME which deals with the issues you raise, and see, if you can. my new film, PLUNDER: THE CRME OF OUR TIME.

One reason the left is stalled is because of the putdownish tone of your comment. and the self-righteous attitude behind it, as well as your misreading of my piece


Danny Schechter

dissector@mediachannel.org

 

Reply this comment

Comment_reply

Person

Re: Re: Has The Economy Been Pulled Back From The Brink? Who Is Recovering?

By Degrees, Freedom at Sep 16, 2009 22:07 PM

 

I

Reply this comment


Person

Re:

By Angie, Angie at Sep 17, 2009 05:55 AM

Your reply refers to my "tone" and my "attitude" but not to any of my substantive charges that even if the world got what little you are asking for in this piece, it doesn't change a damn thing or save us from this profit system that leaves 1 billion hungry, 25 percent of humanity without electricity, 41 percent of humanity who are forced to shit in the streets because of lack of sanitation.  Are you asking for a rational resource based economy on the other hand in your book?  If so, what page?  Is it searchable on Amazon?   Or in your movie, at what link?  In a past Z piece that contradicts this one?  What's a jail out?  What point(s)

did I misread in your post?

Reply this comment


Person

That's it, Mr. Schechter? Really?

By Angie, Angie at Sep 16, 2009 20:51 PM

For exactly what are you suggesting THE PEOPLE take action on the ground, Mr. Schechter?  You want the people to take action seeking regulation and reform of an inherently diseased economic system?  You want us to take to the streets to force jail time for just the current crop of bad and greedy guys?   What we really need rather than mere punishment and reform/regulation is an economic system with rationality and logic - like a Resource Based Economy rather than this system where the profit motive poisons everything, and the incredible technologies and resources we have - sufficient for all to have an abundant life - are not put to the service of humanity.  (For an introduction into a rational Resource Based Economy where our resources and technology can actually serve humanity, all of it, see the free movie on the Internet called “Zeitgeist Addendum” at http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7065205277695921912# .)  Mr. Schechter, you ask Obama:

“Why can't you propose serious reforms on the financial sector?  Why can't we jail the financial criminals?”

I ask why can’t the left realize they aren’t asking for anything important enough, or anything real, to bring masses of people aboard their train?  You think jailing the current crop of baddies is going to change people’s quality of life?  You think “serious reforms of the financial sector” will do likewise?  The people know better than you that this system is set up always, serious reforms or not, for the top tiny elite to own & control while the bottom millions suffer.   

And technology can now take over the drudgery of much work which is causing technological unemployment.  The left ignores this quandary while merely complaining of unemployment and begging for jobs.  Learn about a resource based economy where technology *can actually work for humanity*, for all of it, and not against it. 

You ask “How long before they realize you can't eat optimistic speeches?”

I ask “How long before the left realizes that we can’t eat its hollow, insignificant and superficial proposals like yours?

How long?

Angie

Angie@WhatNewsShouldBe.org

P.S.  When you ask Obama “Why can't you bring to the discussion of the economy the same passion and fact-based arguments that you brought to the health care debate?”,  I ask you what planet are you on to think that Obama has brought fact-based arguments into the health care debate when he makes deals with the health care insurance industry, leaving this useless and parasitic industry still in the picture, instead of getting the country to adopt a single payer plan (Medicare for all, even the young), which is where any honest review of the facts would lead anyone? What planet?

Reply this comment

Comment_reply

Person

Re: That's it, Mr. Schechter? Really?

By Nguyen-tri, David at Sep 17, 2009 09:17 AM

Not that this is any of my business, but what exactly are you hoping to achieve here? If your goal was to make the promotion of a resource based economy, I'd say that poo-pooing notions that fall short of what you desire does a real disservice to your cause. For instance, you could have stated it as: "While I agree that the financial criminals should  be jailed and that economic reform is called for, it should be kept in mind that even if they were sent to jail and financial regulation enacted, the prevailing economic system is unsustainable even with these actions. The reason for that is..."

It may be sad, but tone matters when you're trying to convince people. If you're making it antagonistic, people get entrenched in their position because they feel under attack. Plus, it has to be kept in mind that movements often start with small actions that coalesce into something bigger. Sure, capitalism is unsustainable, but how realistic is it to ask people to reject it overnight? And if they don't, how is beating them over the head going to help?

Reply this comment

Loading_border