Zcom_simple




38

Health Care and Ghosts of War




Change Text Size a- | A+


Speaking in a time of war, Martin Luther King Jr. said: "Somehow this madness must cease."

Forty-one years later, young soldiers are returning to the United States from terrifying zones of carnage. The old claims of a justified war have melted away. So have the promises of a humane society back home.

Statistics about the war dead tell us very little about human realities. And familiar downbeat numbers about health care -- 47 million Americans with no health insurance, perhaps an equal number woefully under-insured -- tell us very little about the actual consequences or other options.

"The shocking facts about health care in the United States are well known," Yes! Magazine noted in the autumn of 2006. "There's little argument that the system is broken. What's not well known is that the dialogue about fixing the health care system is just as broken."

That's an apt description. For all the media focus and political rhetoric on health care, the mainline discourse is stuck in a corporate-friendly rut. But there are signs that a movement for a rational, humanistic health care system in this country is now gaining strength.

A few hours after writing these words, I'll be at a large demonstration in San Francisco. The lightning rod for this historic June 19 protest is a national meeting of America's Health Insurance Plans, an outfit that cheerily pitches itself as "a national trade association representing nearly 1,300 member companies providing health benefits to more than 200 million Americans."

As it happens, this meeting of America's Health Insurance Plans got underway just as news broke that the congressional "leadership" has devised a formula to fully fund more war. "Democratic and GOP leaders in the House announced agreement Wednesday on a long-overdue war funding bill they said President Bush would be willing to sign," the Associated Press reported. The bill would "provide about $165 billion to the Pentagon to fund military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan for about a year."

There's a lot of profit in death. Under the guise of national security. And under the guise of health care.

Today, across the United States, people are dying because they don't have access to health care. But policy solutions are available. In Congress, about 90 co-sponsors are backing H.R. 676, a bill to provide "comprehensive health insurance coverage for all United States residents." Call it whatever you like -- "single payer" or "improved Medicare for all" or "universal health care with choice of providers and no financial barriers." What it adds up to is the policy option of treating health care as the human right that it is.

In the latest edition of "Health Care Meltdown," author C. Rocky White identifies himself as "a conservative Republican who has always held an entrepreneurial 'pull yourself up by your own bootstraps' free-market philosophy." A longtime physician, White describes "the frustration I began to experience while trying to provide compassionate, quality health care in the context of a market in which the accustomed rules of business economics don't apply."

Dr. White immersed himself in research on health care policy and finance. Then he pored through reams of the latest data on the tradeoffs of reform options. "No matter how I turned the cube," he writes, "the answer never changed. That answer was nearly impossible for me, a free-market Republican, to accept."

Here are Dr. White's two key conclusions in his own words:

* "Until we remove the motive of profit from the financing of health care, we cannot and we will not resolve our current health care crisis."

* "Any group that proposes reform policy that maintains the use of for-profit insurance companies in a so-called free market is being driven by one single motive -- to protect the golden coffers of their share of the $2 trillion cash cow!"

Dr. White adds: "To continue down this road is paramount to suggesting that we privatize our fire and police services and turn them into for-profit organizations. You do that and people will die -- just like they are dying now under our current health care system!"

Grotesquely, the insurance and hospital industries at the center of health care in the United States are, in effect, profiting from priorities that condemn many people to death and many more to avoidable suffering.

Meanwhile, corporate enterprises continue to make a killing from U.S. military expenditures now in the vicinity of $2 billion per day.

During a wartime speech in 1969, the Nobel Prize-winning biologist George Wald said: "Our government has become preoccupied with death, with the business of killing and being killed."

The preoccupation continues.

"When machines and computers, profit motives and property rights, are considered more important than people," Martin Luther King observed, "the giant triplets of racism, extreme materialism, and militarism are incapable of being conquered."

Still, somehow, this madness must cease.

Norman Solomon, the author of "War Made Easy," is a national co-chair of Healthcare NOT Warfare. The other co-chairs of the campaign, launched by Progressive Democrats of America, are Donna Smith (featured in "Sicko"), Marilyn Clement (national coordinator of Healthcare-NOW) and Rep. John Conyers, chief sponsor of H.R. 676.

583593

By Nissenbaum, Dan at Jun 21, 2008 03:35 AM

I know that Normon Solomon is excited to be a delegate for Barack Obama.  I am curious what he thinks about Obama\'s desire to maintain the for-profit health insurance industry, as well as Obama\'s desire to maintain at or near its current levels the United States\' dwarfing military budget.

It seems that Obama is, in the words quoted from Dr. White by Solomon in the article, not interested in  "removing the motive of profit from the financing of health care, [so that] we cannot and we will not resolve our current health care crisis."

I\'s be interested in Normon S\'s views about this - why he\'s excited to be an Obama delegate, rather than protesting the Presidential candidacy of a candidate with a seemingly semi-radical Leftist background who is funded in large part by large corporations, who preaches a populist line because it satisfies the guilty mainstream liberal establishment, and who appeals to the best instincts of those who confuse the legitimacy of a black man as the potential next President with the elimination of racism - while that candidate defends the worst of capitalism.

I respect Solomon\'s work greatly, but it does concern me that in the article he recently wrote on the subject, as an Obama delegate he seems to put aside the deep concerns described in this article, even though the same deep criticisms apply to Obama.

Dan Nissenbaum.

Reply this comment

Comment_reply

Person

Re: Corporate Candidate

By Beringer-Newlin, Gretchen at Jun 21, 2008 16:50 PM

It\'s 2008. Do you know where the dissenters are? Answer: Putting up yard signs for war enabler, corporate \"whore,\" Barack Obama. (Michael Moore\'s term for our so-called representatives and Senators who, in reality, work for corporations). I have no idea what might be going on in the mind of the author of this piece. Mr. Solomon is, once again, running around the country urging voters to support the Democrat Party, no matter what they stand for. Solomon used to be a media critic but now he practices the very same tactics that he once criticized in others. I have yet to read anything from Solomon seriously critical of Barack Obama. Obama gets a free pass. Fairness and Accuracy, indeed. Norm, Barack Obama is the Democratic nominee for president. He is in favor of corporate controlled health care, yet you don\'t even mention this in your article? And you must know by now that Obama supports immunity for the telecommunications corporations who helped Bush spy, illegally, on Americans? Do you have nothing to say about these corporate leanings? Have you seen his picks for the \"Senior Working Group on National Security?\" Those who think they can \"take over the party\" are wrong. They can\'t. It\'s all locked up. It\'s rigged. You\'ll get kicked down before you reach the first rung. Better to put your brains and experience into helping third parties and independents. NAME DROPPING Steven Zunes says Obama \"has surrounded himself with backers of failed foreign policies based upon contempt for international legal norms and military solutions to complex political problems.\" Bill Moyers says, \"We deserve better.\" (ret.) Col. Ann Wright: \"We must support and help to build third parties.\" Howard Zinn: \"Obama is only slightly to the left of Republicans.\" Slightly!

Reply this comment

Loading_border