Hondurans Call Out for Help from the International Community
We started out with a briefing by the Network of Sustainable Development (Red de Desarrollo Sostenible) a 15-year-old organization devoted to the exchange of information about sustainable development. It has now become a center for exchanging information about the coup. Using blogspot, facebook, twitter, myspace, flickr and youtube, the Network’s network is abuzz with hour-by-hour accounts of political developments. Their communication system has become a critical way for Hondurans to get information, since the coup leaders have muzzled the press.
The Network has a history of being objective and staying above politics, but the staff is outraged by the coup. “This was just over the top,” said National Coordinator Raquel Isaura, who is being targeted by the right for some anti-coup internet messages posted under her name. “A military coup in this day and age must be condemned by all sectors of civil society.”
Like many Hondurans, Network Director Candalario Reyes Garcia is deeply worried about the future. “In the 80s we were terrorized by the death squads called Batallion 316. These same death squad leaders are still in the military today and if they take control of this country, we’re in for some truly dark days ahead.”
Demonstrations against the coup have been taking place all over the country, but they are not reported in the news and protesters are beaten and tear-gassed by the military. Some movement leaders have been arrested, others are in hiding. The military has also prevented demonstrators from converging on the capital,
When I asked Colindres why his group supported Zelaya, he said that for the first time in decades, the government of President Zelaya increased the budget for public universities and increased scholarships for the students. “We have a lot of poor students who were helped by this government. We don’t want the elite to take back the government and use it, as they have in the past, to enrich themselves and impoverish the people.”
Our last visit of the day, which went on for hours, was a fascinating gathering with members of the indigenous community, Lencas and Garifanos. This group was lucky to have made it to the capital, where they are camping out in a school auditorium. Entire families, from babies to grandmas, participate in roving protests every day. They keep moving so the military doesn’t know where they will be from one day to the next.
One by one, these very humble and poor people told us about their situation, their beliefs, their fears and their dreams. Valentina Dominquez, a primary school teacher, said, “Our people are suffering from poverty, and President Zelaya tried to help. He raised the minimum wage and in the schools, he made sure that all the children were given snacks. He made school registration free and increased programs to help the 20% of Hondurans who don’t know how to read or write. That’s why we made our way to
Teresa Reyes, with the organization of black Hondurans called OFRANEH, said this new regime was terrorizing the people. “On the day of the coup, they cut the electricity, blacked out the news, and told us not to leave our houses. We were scared, we are scared, and we’re exhausted—some of us have been walking for days to get here. But even so, we were determined to keep protesting.”
Salvador Zuniga, one of the heads of the Civil Council of Popular and Indigenous Organizations of Honduras (COPINH), talked about the extreme poverty and illiteracy in
Melicio Intibuca, an elderly farmer, was terrified that
Medea Benjamin (medea@globalexchange.org) is cofounder of Global Exchange (www.globalexchange.org) and CODEPINK (www.codepinkalert.org)



The user who created this comment no longer exists.
Intervene! (or Not?)
By Casten, J.D. at Jul 03, 2009 12:23 PM
Medea Benjamin’s piece was helpful, as I’m trying to get this straight in my head:
Seizure of political power… obviously a criminal “mistake” on the part of the Honduran military; their story, it seems from what I’ve read, is that Zelaya was corrupt and trying to seize power himself by implementing populist economic policies (like higher minimum wages and financing education for the poor—hardly a crime), allying with Chavez, and “illegally” moving towards a referendum that would alter an “unalterable” constitution. Why on earth does Honduras have an “unalterable” constitution, and if Zelaya had a low 30% approval rating before the kidnapping or coup (and little support from his own party), why be so afraid of this public referendum? (Which was aimed, as I understand it, to allow Zelaya to run for office again).
Zelaya may have been making all the right moves aimed at becoming a South American “dictator,” (if “dictator” is the right word… “overly centralized authority” would be a better term: what do you call a president backed by many of the poor, but opposed by nearly everyone else in-between); and this must have disturbed the current, possibly elite, power structure he was challenging (he felt he had to force announcements on the “elite” media that he thought was misrepresenting him—journalists have also been attacked). For those who favor a Chavez type of power structure, Zelaya must seem somewhat of a great hope (Chavez himself has lead the ban of exporting oil to Honduras, and threatened an invasion… just the sort of interventions that end up hurting the population of a country more than limiting their questionable military: trying to force a revolt by making the populace all the more miserable). But unlike Chavez, Zelaya doesn’t have Venezuela’s oil revenues to support his programs for the disempowered.
How can Zelaya effectively return to leadership when his own government (and many Hondurans) reject his authority? Could his populist policies to help the poor gain new momentum… would his referendum to be re-elected stand a better chance? Could this “coup” backfire, and propel Zelaya into that “overly centralized authority?”
Since the “coup” leaders have proposed early elections now, illegally I understand, why not put Zelaya on the ballot too along with the referendum on term limits? Why bother with the law, when it’s almost always a “cooperative war” between decentralized democracy and centralized power structures?
Reply this comment