How Antisemitic Conspiracy Theories and Fearmongering Led to the Holocaust Memorial Shooting
The broadcast of hatred and paranoia have led to perfect storm of mobilized resentment threatening to rain violent bigotry across the US.
The alleged shooter at the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum today has an online book excerpt revealing his deep roots in historic White Supremacy and antisemitic conspiracy theories, including references to the hoax document The Protocols of the Elders of Zion. His website includes links to White Supremacist and Holocaust denial sites.
People who believe conspiracist allegations sometimes act on those irrational beliefs, and this has concrete consequences in the real world. The shooting today is a prime example of why it is a mistake to ignore bigoted conspiracy theories. Law enforcement needs to enforce laws against criminal behavior. Vicious bigoted speech, however, is often protected by the First Amendment. We do not need new laws or to encourage government agencies to further erode civil liberties. We need to stand up as moral people and speak out against the spread of bigoted conspiracy theories. That’s not a police problem, that’s our problem as people responsible for defending a free society.
Demagogues and conspiracy theorists use the same four “tools of fear." These are 1) dualism; 2) scapegoating; 3) demonization; and 4) apocalyptic aggression. The tools of fear are a connected constellation of frames, narratives, and processes used by demagogues to mobilize resentment and undermine the democratic process.
The basic dynamics remain the same no matter the ideological leanings of the demonizers or the identity of their targets. Meanwhile, our ability to resolve disputes through civic debate and compromise is hobbled. It is the combination of demagogic demonization and widespread scapegoating that is so dangerous. In such circumstances, angry allegations can quickly turn into apocalyptic aggression and violence targeting scapegoated groups like Jews or immigrants.
Apocalyptic aggression is fueled by right-wing pundits who demonize scapegoated groups and individuals in our society, implying that it is urgent to stop them from wrecking the nation. Some angry people in the ir audience already believe conspiracy theories in which the same scapegoats are portrayed as subversive, destructive, or evil. Add in aggressive apocalyptic ideas that suggest time is running out and quick action mandatory and you have a perfect storm of mobilized resentment threatening to rain bigotry and violence across the United States.
What historian Richard Hofstadter famously described as the “paranoid style” in American political rhetoric can quickly move far beyond the conscious intent of those who practice it.
Chip Berlet is Senior Analyst of Political Research Associates and the author of a new study entitled Toxic to Democracy: Conspiracy Theories, Demonization, and Scapegoating. He also is coauthor, with Matthew N. Lyons, of Right-Wing Populism in America: Too Close for Comfort.



By Bybee, Roger at Dec 06, 2009 21:34 PM
Dear Chip:
I appreciate your onoging analyses of the Right. While the Republicans and tea-baggers have nothing resembling the coherent message assembled by Gingrich and Frank Luntz in 1994, they can still pose a gravae danger to democracy because of the astonishing level of economic misery and social dislocation (see my latest Z article on Apocalypse Now" in the industrial Midwest) coupled with the potential for scapegoating Jews and African-Americans.
You might be interested in this excerpt from my Nov. 26 blog for Workinginthesetimes.com:
**************************************
"...the Republicans' current feebleness may be giving many Obama and other Democrats the illusion that they can put the appeasement of big health and Wall Street contributors ahead of addressing the acute needs of their deeply hurting electoral base.
POTENTIAL FOR RIGHT-WING POPULIST BACKLASH
However, the Obama Administration's incestuous ties to Goldman Sachs in particular and Wall Street in general may provide the Republicans with some targets that are just too tempting.
"The rage out there is larger than Palin and defies partisan labeling," correctly observes NY Times columnist Frank Rich:
No corporate entity has matched Enron for rapaciousness coupled with more disdain for public opinion and the public interest like Goldman Sachs. But there is a very dangerous potential that the proposed Palin attack on Goldman Sachs--whose name could hardly be more Jewish-sounding--will help to ignite a barely-disguised racist and anti-Semitic backlash. The linkage of Jewish names with the crucifixion carries particularly heavy imagery.
Whether it is Palin or ultimately someone else who shapes and directs this sentiment, the elements of a very ugly campaign of hate-driven resentment--fueled at least in part by recession-caused pain-- are becoming increasingly visible. "
So the Right faces the combination of an African-American president who was inaugurated just in time to inherit the worst economic debacle in eight decades, plus two unpopular wars, plus the prominence of so many idenfitiably Jewish names (Iby way of contrast, my Jewish wife and children have last names like Winter and Phillips) connected with the Wall Street meltdown (as well as a number of Jews among Obama's economic advisors).
Any thoughts on how various elements of the Right may respond to this "opportunity"?
Reply this comment
Re: Racist & Antisemitic Backlash
By Berlet, Chip at Jan 25, 2010 06:39 AM
Just figured out how this works.
Alas, your concerns have been shown to be all too true.
Sigh...
Reply this comment