Zcom_simple

Hello,

Blogs are a familiar feature on the internet - where users post content in an accumulating manner, with comments, and search options, etc. They facilitate expression and exploration, and via attached comments, also debate and synthesis.


Reading and
Navigating Blogs

Our blogs are quite powerful. Each writer can post, as is typically the case. Sustainers who have the option can also post, however. All Blogs appear in the blog system, and sometimes also in content boxes the top page of ZNet - and always via the left menu of the top page - and can be found via searches, etc.

Commenting on blogs follows the blogs, attached at the bottom, and blog comments, like all others, are also visible in many places that show comments including in the forum system. In addition, the entire blog system gathers content for everyone - but one can look at the accumulating content in many ways.

  • For example one can look at one writer's efforts - so one is seeing what is effectively a blog system for that one writer, or Sustainer.
  • One can also look at the content by topic, seeing blogs that are tagged as being about a certain topic - or place, as well. Thus, when doing that, it is a blog system about a topic, or a place, with many contributors.
  • One can look at only writer blogs, or only sustainer blogs, as well.
  • One can look at blogs for particular Groups, too.

All this is easily done using the left menu. Searches allow even more variables and refinements.


Creating Blog Posts

If you are a Sustainer with permission, and are logged in, you will see a link in the left menu for you to post a blog - and you can use that to post one, and then tag it various ways (such as with a topic or place, or a group tag), and once you do, it is in the system with you as the author.

You can also use the console button to the left to post a blog - anytime and from anywhere in the site, as long as you are logged in.

Meanwhile, enjoy the blogs - and, by the way, if you are a Free Member or a Sustainer with a ZSpace page, of course you can put one or more content boxes on it, pulling blog links of any sort you may want to filter for, for example, by you or by your friends or by others - and by topic, about places, for groups, etc.

Blogs

Occupy_iowa_city_rally

Paul Street's Blog

Web Address: http://www.zcommunications.org/zspace/paulstreet
Bio:         Paul Street is an independent radical-democratic policy researcher, journalist, historian, and speaker based in Iowa City, Iowa, and Chicago, Illinois.&nbs... (More)

All Street Blogs

Imperial Vocabulay

By Paul Street at Feb 28, 2007


Change Text Size a- | A+

The prolific left intellectual Edward S. Herman reminds us that United States imperialism relies on “Orwellian language” as well as “guns, tanks, missiles, and bombs.” The distortion of words and phrases to put the use of state violence “in a good light” is  “an essential tool of [U.S.] state managers” seeking to subvert democracy and kill hope at home and abroad (Edward S. Herman, “Doublespeak,” Z Magazine [December 2006], pp. 24-26).

Here are some of my contributions, some specifically tailored for the ongoing assault on Iraq, to Herman's “Doublespeak Dictionary” of American State Terrorism:

“Terrorism,” Literal Definition: the use of violence and/or the threat of violence to achieve political ends.  Imperial/Orwellian/Iraq War Usage: refers to violent and officially inexplicable resistance to an inherently benevolent U.S. occupation.  Does NOT refer to the American Empire's use of massive state violence (and the threat thereof) to sustain an illegal, mass-murderous and imperialist occupation.

 “Democracy,” Literal Definition: majority rule based on the principles of one-person, one vote and equal policy-making influence for all people regardless of class, race or other social distinctions. Imperial Usage: the basic goal and purpose behind all U.S. policies and actions, no matter how authoritarian and regressive those policies and actions may be. Does NOT accurately describe any aspect of the struggle of Iraqi people to end the illegal occupation of their country – an invasion opposed by their own popular majority and even by the majority inside the occupier state.

“Freedom,” Literal Definition: the absence of necessity, coercion, or constraint in choice of action; liberation from slavery or restraint or from the power of another: Independence; a political right; franchise, privilege.” Imperial Usage: the basic goal and purpose behind all U.S. policies and actions, regardless of actual impact on assaulted, restricted, oppressed and subordinated others. Does NOT apply to the motivation and aim of people and nations opposing U.S. domination. Anyone who resists American imperial dominance is an enemy of “freedom” (sometimes called “liberty”) and its twin U.S. goal “democracy.” 

“Sacrifice,” Literal Definition: to suffer loss of, give up, renounce, injure or destroy, especially for an ideal, belief, or end. Imperial/Iraq War Usage: the fleeting emotional discomfort that some rich Americans may feel when they learn that a large number of mostly working-class Americans have died in the enforcement of an illegal invasion designed to increase the wealth of the privileged few (without requiring that the sons and daughters of the wealthy “serve” on the fields of imperial conquest). Does NOT refer to people who die resisting American assault and resource-theft. Does NOT require any cessation in the granting of massive tax cuts to the already super-opulent few in the industrialized world's most unequal and wealth-top-heavy state (the U.S.).   

 “Support the [U.S.] Troops,” Literal Definition: to promote the interests or cause of the [U.S.] troops; to uphold or defend those troops as valid or right; to argue or vote for the troops; to COMFORT the troops. Imperial/Iraq War Usage: the sending of heavily brainwashed, mostly young and disproportionately working-class Americans into a distant maelstrom to engage in the perilous work of subjugating an understandably outraged and heavily armed populace.  Does NOT refer to efforts to end the illegal occupation and bring the U.S. troops out of harm's way in accord with the GI's wishes.   

“Surge,” Literal Definition: a swelling, rolling or sweeping forward like that of a wave or a series of waves…a transient sudden rise of current in an electrical circuit. Imperial Usage: a dangerous escalation and regional broadening of a provocative and illegitimate invasion.   

 “Interfere,” Literal Definition: to interpose in a way that hinders or impedes; to enter into or take part in the concerns of others. Imperial Usage: refers to any and all efforts to hinder or impede a U.S. occupation (i.e., O.I.F.).  Does NOT refer to U.S. efforts to hinder or impede the independence and autonomous action of other nations (e.g. Iraq) or to widespread U.S. involvement in the internal affairs of other states. 

 “International Community,” Imperial Usage: the United States.  Does NOT refer to the actual international community. 

 “Free Market Economy,” literal translation: an economic market operating by free competition.  Imperial usage: the heavily state-subsidized, government-protected and corporate-state-dominated U.S. economy; the basic inspiration behind U.S. efforts to use expensive, taxpayer-financed state violence, bribery and interference to increase U.S. corporate and state control of global markets and resources.  

 “Good intentions,” Imperial Usage: the basic benevolent motivation behind U.S. policy.  Does NOT refer to the motivation behind those who resist U.S. policy.

 “Victim,” Literal Translation: one that is acted on and adversely affected by a force or agents; one that is subjected to oppression, hardship, or mistreatment; one that is tricked or duped. Imperial Usage: refers mainly to Americans killed by foreign “terrorists” on U.S. soil (i.e. the 9/11 dead) or overseas.  Does NOT generally refer to innocent Arab civilians killed by inherently “liberating” U.S., Israeli or British bombs, missiles, and bullets. Does not refer to American citizens and troops who were tricked or duped by the Bush administration and dominant U.S. media into supporting (and even enlisting in) the war on Iraq.    

“Failed States" [a recent Imperial Invention]: foreign states “that generally cannot provide security for their citizens or their territory, and are corrupt and illegitimate in the eyes of their civilians and tend to give rise to terrorists.”  Imperial Usage: refers to states targeted for U.S. intervention and sanction.  Does NOT refer to the U.S. even though the U.S. state fails to provide adequate security to its citizens, is corrupt and illegitimate in the eyes of its citizens and has given rise to a massive global state-terrorist operation called the American Empire, correctly identified by Martin Luther King, Jr., as “the leading purveyor of violence in the world.” 

 “Foreign Fighters,” Imperial/Iraq War Translation: people from outside a U.S. occupied nation who assist resistance to U.S. invasion of that nation.  Does NOT refer to U.S. forces engaged in the foreign invasion and occupation of that nation. 

The list goes on (the possibilities are almost endless).... 

The above is pasted in from The Empire and Inequality Report, no. 8 (January 26, 2007): http://www.zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm?ItemID=11960

Person

Massive Civil Disobedience

By Kissenger, Clark at Mar 07, 2007 19:11 PM

Massive civil disobedience. Good idea. Dunno if the barrier is belief in the government though. Could also be this sort of thing . . . Keir The Hague

Reply this comment


Person

Agreed

By Kissenger, Clark at Mar 07, 2007 13:22 PM

Massive civil disobedience and long-lasting sit-ins. This would truly grind things to a halt and cause action. Unfortunately, unlike India or Ukraine, the average US citizen still has not reached the point where he is beginning to doubt his government that seriously. They still believe in the American myth. They still believe America, right or wrong. They still believe they live in a democracy. They still don't understand why the world is beginning to hate America. They still don't understand democracy v Empire. They still don't understand WHO is really in charge.

Reply this comment


Person

One more

By Kissenger, Clark at Mar 07, 2007 04:26 AM

Collateral Damage:  Massacre of innocent civilians, especially women and children, can also include irreversible damage to the ecology.

 

Reply this comment


Person

civil disobedience

By Hgh, Unbelievable at Mar 07, 2007 01:25 AM

OK, then. Massive Civil DisObedience

Reply this comment


Person

Eastern Europe vs USA

By Kissenger, Clark at Mar 06, 2007 19:44 PM

The biggest difference between eg the Rose Revolution and the protests prior to the Iraq War is its length and intensity. A bit simplified the Iraq War demonstrations lasted a few hours with speeches and a march. The Rose Revolution and the others (we may also include Venezuela and Bolivia here) lasted much, much longer - from weeks to months. This puts an immense pressure on the political leadership. I honestly believe that if this pressure was held up long enough, they would have to take action. One problem in mountain such a pressure of course, is that Bush isn't a dictator. The system itself is basically dictatorial, but there isn't a dictator in place. He is elected by the people (okay, not Bush, but earlier presidents). It is also possible to argue that the Iraq demonstrations had a certain effect. Rumsfeld wanted to send a lot more troops to Iraq than he eventually did. One could argue they didn't dare to send 200,000 (or whatever it was he wanted) because of the huge public pressure. I can talk of Norway for instance. At the time we had a centre-right government with a religious nutcase as PM ('supporter' of Israel no matter what etc). Everybody knew they would support the war. Then there were massive demonstrations against the war, also here in Norway. They didn't dare to say officially that they supported it. Later it turned out they sent weapons and some troops (for which he should have been indicted btw), but due to the massive public pressure they didn't dare to officially support the war. I can imagine the same was true in the US. The war still happened, but it would have been much worse if it wasn't for the peace marches etc. The fact there is finally a bit of serious talk about US withdrawal is also due to the massive opposition to the war. So we shouldn't dig ourselves down and say we didn't, or don't, have an impact. So I think if the US people could mount massive demonstrations and lock-downs of the White House and Senate, as we've seen in other countries, I think it could have a massive impact. It is really up to us. If we want change, we can achieve it. It won't happen over night, but keep up the pressure for long enough and results will come. Perhaps I am naïve, but I think the media would notice it too, after a while. They can only turn their back to something for so long. A 3-hour demonstration and a 3-week lock-down are two very different things. Pangaea Oslo, Norway

Reply this comment


Person

What to do?

By Hgh, Unbelievable at Mar 06, 2007 19:06 PM

Paul: I didn't mean to suggest (above) that suppression of the people's will should bring us to conclude that "violence" is the effective way to express popular opposition to the iraqi misadventure, and other abuses of our political system. I do think raising the question why methods of popular expression that once were effective no longer are is a valid one. In any case, it's doubtful that force in the hands of demonstrators will be a match for the force of the state.I do suggest, where we have an imposter in the white house who insists that neither the congress, the courts, the constitution, or the will of the people is any barrier to his illegal adventures, and arrogantly brags the crimes will continue, that we must seek new ways to mount opposition.There was a time when popular opposition by 70-80% of the people to war, economic exploitation, concentration of wealth and power, a failing health system, etc., would move institutions to satisfy these demands. Not today. The internet is clearly not enough, either. In fact, it seems like a useless blowhole for the lot of us.I do like the model of sustained civic opposition the likes of which we saw in the phillipines, ukraine, etc. It compares to the european tradition of general strike, which is absent here. It also raises the possibility of state repression and clashes, even when non-violence is applied.What to do? 

Reply this comment


Person

Violence

By Kissenger, Clark at Mar 06, 2007 12:22 PM

I am personally never mystified about how the Weathermen thing happened. Of course it happened: after all the shit that went down, the millions in the streets, doing the civic engagement thing, trying to protest within the system...after all the letters written to congressmen, after all the vigils and GI activism and public forums and debates and resolutions and petitions and so on and ...the Empire was still mercilessly bombing Vietnam and invading Cambodia etc. Some folks were going to lose it and try (pretty damn clumsily in the Weathermen's case) to take up arms. The current imperial policy and the collaboration of the "liberals" is truly great incitement - very provocative, like they're daring people to learn how to manufacture IEDs for the homeland. But of course violence will get you absolutely nowhere in current situation and in fact the "elite" would love to see some radicals driven crazy enough to start making bombs and the like.

Reply this comment


Person

I hate to quote a liberal...

By Kissenger, Clark at Mar 06, 2007 08:01 AM

...but "Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." JFK

Reply this comment


Z

Two million people stood in

By Anonymous, Anonymous at Mar 06, 2007 00:31 AM

Two million people stood in the streets of manhattan before the Iraq invasion in opposition to bush regime war plans. they were corralled in pens and left to unrinate and defecate in the streets. The so-called media news barely reported it. Many times since large public manifestations have been effectively suppressed (think of the two bush inaugurations) and the public expression of protest rendered mute by the state.

I'm just not sure how the massively disaffected populace can make its views seen and heard in this environment peacefully.

Reply this comment


Person

Pessimism and optimism

By Kissenger, Clark at Mar 04, 2007 20:10 PM

Good posts from both of you. Can only say that I very much agree. The US is on a very dangerous path atm, and it seems there are very few people and organizations effectively making a dent in its path towards actual fascism. Yet countries with much less resources than the US have thrown out its leaders. True, the US had a hand in it, but several East-European countries have thrown out there authoritarian leaders non-violently. I see no reason why this could not be tried in the US. There is of course a bigger risk that Bush will beat it down violently, but at this point massive demonstrations and surrounding the Capital and White House is needed. It's been done before in other countries very successfully, and can be done in the US as well. Paul, I understand why the person you are referring to (no idea who) stopped posting. There is simply a limit to how much bullshit and lies a person can take, without getting anywhere trying to put it right. I have tremendous respect for people like that, for instance people fighting powerful corporations in court over years, or even decades, to finally win. It takes dedication and courage of very high degrees. I actually don't read as much on ZNet, CounterPunch etc as I used to. Much of the articles follow the same paths, and they don't carry much new information. Basically it is pessimistic reading. I feel I have a fairly good understanding of what and why Bush is doing what he is, so reading about his actions basically gets me down (and the injustice pisses me off something unreal). What is needed in the US is nothing short of a revolution. There is so much that needs changing I don't see it happening 'naturally' over time. The development is going in the wrong direction. I attended a Johan Galtung lecture here in Norway a few weeks ago, where he (paraphrased) said there has already been a military coup in the US. Just look at the composition of the Administration and the increasing power of the Pentagon. It's real scary. Then there are two parties that say and do basically the same (esp in important matters). There isn't democracy anymore in the US. Anyone familiar with US politics knows this won't change anytime soon. To get anywhere in politics you need massive amounts of money, meaning you sell out to corporations and powerful interests. Then you can't do anything to change the underlying structures, even if you wanted to in the first place. In my opinions (admittedly as a non-US citizen) this calls for a non-violent revolution, as we have seen in many countries from the North-East to the South-West. It was possible to get millions of people in the streets to protest the Iraq war. I'm sure it could be done again to re-institute democracy in the US by throwing out the criminals currently occupying the White House and Congress. Just imagine 100,000 people with thousands of signs surrounding the White House and Congress, for weeks and months, not letting anyone in or out. I'm sure the entire world would support such an action by the US people. There is of course no guarantee this will make all the changes that is necessary, or that there wouldn't be a counter-revolution, perhaps making things even worse. But at this point it needs to be tried. For the sake of the planet and all its inhabitants. Pangaea Oslo, Norway

Reply this comment


Person

*sigh*

By Kissenger, Clark at Mar 04, 2007 18:43 PM

It is indeed wearisome, this continuing barrage of misinformation we get daily, 24/7. The average person has little chance of keeping up with the real news, as most people have a life of some sort. As for this becoming a dangerous country, I might add that the waters are being tested daily for the perfect time to move to an openly fascist state. Bush and his minions almost daily throw up some new test of their power to inflict pain on the Union. In my opinion this is no accident. Openly telling a news interviewer that no one can stop the "surge" is not only an open challenge to Congress and the people, but is quite simply a new test of just how far they can go without significant resistance. Every year they gain. Every year the American public becomes more and more convinced of its own inability to resist. Every year it gets more difficult for Congress to come together with solidarity against Administration crimes. There will soon come a day when Bush will take the last step in the face of a powerless Congress and a beleagured American public. He will declare indefinite martial law and permanently activate all National Guard units, ordering them into the streets of America. He recently acquired the ability to do such a thing through a rider to one of the bills. The fat lady is taking one last deep breath.

Reply this comment


Person

Reflections

By Kissenger, Clark at Mar 04, 2007 17:50 PM

Panagae you say "I thought of going through the list, but it's pointless really. We all know the facts. It's the same technique used over and over again. Orwellian language, double-speak and double-standards." I've had this same thought myself. I've been noticing for years (a) how incredibly easy it is to discover and expose the falsity of U.S. power elite rhetoric and yet (b) how irrelevant the exposure often seems to be. I am fairly efficient by now at demolishing just about anything said ever by U.S. policymakers and their defenders but it seems to be almost besides the point. Their point isn't to advance truth but simply to beat the public over the head with the endless repetition of doctrinal absurdity. They aren't trying to make rational arguments and win you over with actually intelligent, evidence based rationality. Their naked absurdity is obvious for all moderately intelligent observers to see and yet they win. Untangling all the deceptions and madness and cutting to the truth of matters is practically a full-time job and therefore beyond the capacity of all but a few in the U.S., the industrialized world's most overworked, unequal and under-educated land by far For those who know the score, it's a form of torture. I used to get good information from a web site dedicated entirely to Bush administration lies. Nearly everyday the fellow in charge of the web site had an excellent entry pointing out the deceptive nature of a White House claim: WMD, al Qaeda and Iraq, "middle-class tax cuts," whatever.. It went on for a couple of years I think. One day the guy just quits writing, saying basically "I just can't take it anymore, it's too absurd and it's not good for me to keep focusing on it." The United States is in real danger of becoming permanently absurd and irrevocably authoritarian, a corporate Orwellian bubble land where 2+2=5 because Big Brother says so. The world should take heed. This is a very dangerous nation and quite potentially fascist in the not-so distant furure.

Reply this comment


Person

Orwellian language and other comments

By Kissenger, Clark at Mar 04, 2007 07:27 AM

Terrorism: Resistance groups fighting the Nazis in, say, France or Norway. Democracy: This simply doesn't exist anywhere in the world, perhaps bar Bolivia and Venezuela. All use of the word is simply used for propaganda and dodging the real issues. In no country in the world do the people have real influence over the most important policies to their lives. It is top-down, not bottom-up. Again, perhaps bar Bolivia and Venezuela. Freedom: Again a word used in the West almost exclusively in propaganda efforts. The British used it, the Nazis used it, the Soviets used it, and now the Americans use it. I thought of going through the list, but it's pointless really. We all know the facts. It's the same technique used over and over again. Orwellian language, double-speak and double-standards. As Chomsky notes, no aggressor in history has been honest about its intentions. It's always in the interests of peace, democracy, freedom, national security (a catch-all phrase). It's no wonder the US are doing the same. They have further perfected the technique. Even with so much knowledge and information freely available, the US' citizens are largely unaware of facts and the real reason the US are waging its wars in the Middle East. The Germans didn't have much information available anywhere, Americans have plenty. It is reasonable to say most Germans didn't know what Hitler was up to, at least early on. We can't say the same about Bush. The cat is out of the bag ages ago, and still basically nothing is happening. In a democratic country the leadership of the US would have been dragged out of the White House, put on trial and thrown in jail for the rest of their lives. This isn't even discussed in the US (in the important places and channels). And they say the US is a beacon of democracy in the world :rolleyes: If there are other intelligent civilization out there somewhere, and they knew what we were up to, they'd laugh themselves silly at humans' stupidity and irrationality. When something isn't working an intelligent person/animal/whatever try a different approach. This is of course valid for systems too. When our state and economic systems are working against the enormous majority of the population of the earth, we change it. If we are intelligent beings that is. What is needed can basically be summed up with democracy. If people had influence over the important decisions we would have the organization of world institutions, practices and systems we currently have. The world's institions, practices and systems would reflect its population. The UN, WTO, WB, IMF etc would be democratic, not oligarchic (or in some cases autocratic). These system problems are what is causing all other problems on this planet. Fix this and humans can rightly be called intelligent beings. Pangaea Oslo, Norway

Reply this comment


Person

Market Crash

By Kissenger, Clark at Mar 03, 2007 08:38 AM

They also never talk of a market crash, as in the one coming early next week. The rollercoster of the last week is a telltale sign of a coming large 'correction'. Oh, and its the 'worlds oil' not any one peoples. Funny how communitarian they get when they talk about something they need and don't have.

Reply this comment


Person

Here's

By Kissenger, Clark at Mar 01, 2007 17:50 PM

Here's one:

"pro-American": literally, in support of the American people and society, opposing authoritarian state power, unnecessary foreign entanglements, promoting interests of the majority; imperial usage, supporting programs and policies designed, in effect, to destroy everything that makes America great

opponents to America-destroying "pro-Americanism" are henceforth targeted as "anti-American"

Reply this comment


Person

RE: Bush speeches/Presidential word lists

By Kissenger, Clark at Mar 01, 2007 17:42 PM

Slightly off topic, here is a useful little tool for examining things like the speeches written by Bush's handlers over the last six years, and much more. Keir The Hague

Reply this comment


Person

oil mentions

By Kissenger, Clark at Mar 01, 2007 13:39 PM

mtbrad one interesting thing to track is how often they mention oil. Of course the answer is almost never except to occasionally say that bad people/terorrists/our enemies/peoplewhohatefreedom could get a hold of strategic energy resources and control it and exploit it for evil reasons. We love freedom and simply want to guard ME oil for the good of the world --- to allow the planet access.

Reply this comment


Person

Hello, I´m baaaaaaack!

By Russell, Mariam at Mar 01, 2007 12:30 PM

I was on Grandma duty for a while, but have been trying to catch up and read the INEQUALITY REPORTS you kindly e-mail to me.

Have just read an article by Mike Whitney, TUESDAY´S MARKET MELTDOWN; GREENSPAN´S ¨INVISIBLE HAND¨ which also uses a lot of language that we who do not have degrees in economics get lost in and so do not really understand what we have read. I do think this is by design as are the language uses you are talking about here.

The time I have left on this Earth, I want to use to insure that my children understand the world they live in as well as I can manage, so I have need of a road map to explain how the ¨Financial Markets¨work and how the taxes we pay, the wealth we create, is turned into a system that enslaves most of the people of the world.

I know this is off topic to some degree, and I apologize, but I think it is a very important use of language to obfuscate a subject that is central to the life we live.

 

Reply this comment


Person

Hello, I´m baaaaaaack!

By Russell, Mariam at Mar 01, 2007 12:29 PM

I was on Grandma duty for a while, but have been trying to catch up and read the INEQUALITY REPORTS you kindly e-mail to me.

Have just read an article by Mike Whitney, TUESDAY´S MARKET MELTDOWN; GREENSPAN´S ¨INVISIBLE HAND¨ which also uses a lot of language that we who do not have degrees in economics get lost in and so do not really understand what we have read. I do think this is by design as are the language uses you are talking about here.

The time I have left on this Earth, I want to use to insure that my children understand the world they live in as well as I can manage, so I have need of a road map to explain how the ¨Financial Markets¨work and how the taxes we pay, the wealth we create, is turned into a system that enslaves most of the people of the world.

I know this is off topic to some degree, and I apologize, but I think it is a very important use of language to obfuscate a subject that is central to the life we live.

 

Reply this comment


Person

Sorry...

By Kissenger, Clark at Mar 01, 2007 11:14 AM

I wanted to go back and remove the first post because it got messed up but it won't let me after I posted the second.

Reply this comment


Person

Bush Speech Word Frequencies 2001-2003

By Kissenger, Clark at Mar 01, 2007 11:12 AM

Afghanistan 81 al Qaeda 57 America 979 Armed 24 attack 91 Baghdad 38 biological 37 bless 84 business 205 civilized 23 danger 132 defend 51 defense 27 democracy 110 destruction 73 dictator 48 disarm 50 economy 173 enemy 138 evil 27 faith 38 fear 48 fight 65 free 173 Force(s) 195 freedom 304 friends 103 God 132 good 274 hate 13 Homeland 71 Hussein 132 income 51 Iraq 698 jobs 91 justice 64 killers 27 liberty 82 markets 20 military 209 mission 56 money 170 murder 28 nation 253 nuclear 32 peace 147 progress 84 protect 80 regime 166 Saddam 156 secure 77 security 130 September 79 States 236 strong 83 Taliban 27 tax 271 terror 169 terrorists 230 threat 135 trade 28 troops 38 tyranny 21 war 259 weapons 196

Reply this comment


Person

Bush Speech Word Frequencies

By Kissenger, Clark at Mar 01, 2007 11:04 AM

     

 

              

 

 

Afghanistan

 

 

2001

 

80

 

 

2002

 

95

 

 

2003

 

38

Al Qaeda 39 92 132
America 1 17 110
armed 4 15 23
attack 4 23 21
Baghdad 6 7 51
biological 7 10 24
bless 7 26 20
business 15 38 38
civilized 17 33 28
danger 18 26 56
defend 26 46 205
defense 26 12 27
democracy 26 50 173
destruction 26 0 209
dictator 29 8 81
disarm 29 14 173
economy 32 13 64
enemy 34 7 79
evil 38 128 170
faith 38 92 271
fear 39 33 57
fight 39 8 236
force(s) 41 113 32
free 46 0 253
freedom 48 26 147
friends 49 15 27
God 53 24 698
good/great 57 42 37
hate 58 32 169
homeland 59 15 91
Hussein 60 62 135
income 61 62 77
Iraqi 61 15 83
jobs 64 6 65
justice 68 18 130
killers 74 41 50
liberty 74 32 48
markets 78 61 195
military 82 10 304
mission 88 34 13
money 92 53 27
murder 96 67 166
nation 101 1 138
nuclear 10 84 274
Peace 104 197 259
progress 106 57 38
protect 114 60 84
regime 115 44 27
Saddam 124 17 91
secure 129 58 73
security 131 20 103
September 135 64 156
States 139 26 196
strong 158 0 979
Taliban 172 207 80
tax 173 34 132
terror 197 111 48
terrorists 204 18 132
threat 205 2 230
trade 221 58 84
troops 222 28 82
tyranny 231 72 51
War 400 121 28
weapons 1073 327 71

 

This is comming out kind of messy. If anybody is interested I have an excel file of this as well as most of Clinton's speeches. The first number under each word is the frequency for 2003, the second 2002 and the last 2001.

Reply this comment

Loading_border