Imperial Vocabulay
By Paul Street at Feb 28, 2007 |
|
The prolific left intellectual Edward S. Herman reminds us that United States imperialism relies on “Orwellian language” as well as “guns, tanks, missiles, and bombs.” The distortion of words and phrases to put the use of state violence “in a good light” is “an essential tool of [U.S.] state managers” seeking to subvert democracy and kill hope at home and abroad (Edward S. Herman, “Doublespeak,” Z Magazine [December 2006], pp. 24-26).
Here are some of my contributions, some specifically tailored for the ongoing assault on Iraq, to Herman's “Doublespeak Dictionary” of American State Terrorism:
“Terrorism,” Literal Definition: the use of violence and/or the threat of violence to achieve political ends. Imperial/Orwellian/Iraq War Usage: refers to violent and officially inexplicable resistance to an inherently benevolent U.S. occupation. Does NOT refer to the American Empire's use of massive state violence (and the threat thereof) to sustain an illegal, mass-murderous and imperialist occupation.
“Democracy,” Literal Definition: majority rule based on the principles of one-person, one vote and equal policy-making influence for all people regardless of class, race or other social distinctions. Imperial Usage: the basic goal and purpose behind all U.S. policies and actions, no matter how authoritarian and regressive those policies and actions may be. Does NOT accurately describe any aspect of the struggle of Iraqi people to end the illegal occupation of their country – an invasion opposed by their own popular majority and even by the majority inside the occupier state.
“Freedom,” Literal Definition: the absence of necessity, coercion, or constraint in choice of action; liberation from slavery or restraint or from the power of another: Independence; a political right; franchise, privilege.” Imperial Usage: the basic goal and purpose behind all U.S. policies and actions, regardless of actual impact on assaulted, restricted, oppressed and subordinated others. Does NOT apply to the motivation and aim of people and nations opposing U.S. domination. Anyone who resists American imperial dominance is an enemy of “freedom” (sometimes called “liberty”) and its twin U.S. goal “democracy.”
“Sacrifice,” Literal Definition: to suffer loss of, give up, renounce, injure or destroy, especially for an ideal, belief, or end. Imperial/Iraq War Usage: the fleeting emotional discomfort that some rich Americans may feel when they learn that a large number of mostly working-class Americans have died in the enforcement of an illegal invasion designed to increase the wealth of the privileged few (without requiring that the sons and daughters of the wealthy “serve” on the fields of imperial conquest). Does NOT refer to people who die resisting American assault and resource-theft. Does NOT require any cessation in the granting of massive tax cuts to the already super-opulent few in the industrialized world's most unequal and wealth-top-heavy state (the U.S.).
“Support the [U.S.] Troops,” Literal Definition: to promote the interests or cause of the [U.S.] troops; to uphold or defend those troops as valid or right; to argue or vote for the troops; to COMFORT the troops. Imperial/Iraq War Usage: the sending of heavily brainwashed, mostly young and disproportionately working-class Americans into a distant maelstrom to engage in the perilous work of subjugating an understandably outraged and heavily armed populace. Does NOT refer to efforts to end the illegal occupation and bring the U.S. troops out of harm's way in accord with the GI's wishes.
“Surge,” Literal Definition: a swelling, rolling or sweeping forward like that of a wave or a series of waves…a transient sudden rise of current in an electrical circuit. Imperial Usage: a dangerous escalation and regional broadening of a provocative and illegitimate invasion.
“Interfere,” Literal Definition: to interpose in a way that hinders or impedes; to enter into or take part in the concerns of others. Imperial Usage: refers to any and all efforts to hinder or impede a U.S. occupation (i.e., O.I.F.). Does NOT refer to U.S. efforts to hinder or impede the independence and autonomous action of other nations (e.g. Iraq) or to widespread U.S. involvement in the internal affairs of other states.
“International Community,” Imperial Usage: the United States. Does NOT refer to the actual international community.
“Free Market Economy,” literal translation: an economic market operating by free competition. Imperial usage: the heavily state-subsidized, government-protected and corporate-state-dominated U.S. economy; the basic inspiration behind U.S. efforts to use expensive, taxpayer-financed state violence, bribery and interference to increase U.S. corporate and state control of global markets and resources.
“Good intentions,” Imperial Usage: the basic benevolent motivation behind U.S. policy. Does NOT refer to the motivation behind those who resist U.S. policy.
“Victim,” Literal Translation: one that is acted on and adversely affected by a force or agents; one that is subjected to oppression, hardship, or mistreatment; one that is tricked or duped. Imperial Usage: refers mainly to Americans killed by foreign “terrorists” on U.S. soil (i.e. the 9/11 dead) or overseas. Does NOT generally refer to innocent Arab civilians killed by inherently “liberating” U.S., Israeli or British bombs, missiles, and bullets. Does not refer to American citizens and troops who were tricked or duped by the Bush administration and dominant U.S. media into supporting (and even enlisting in) the war on Iraq.
“Failed States" [a recent Imperial Invention]: foreign states “that generally cannot provide security for their citizens or their territory, and are corrupt and illegitimate in the eyes of their civilians and tend to give rise to terrorists.” Imperial Usage: refers to states targeted for U.S. intervention and sanction. Does NOT refer to the U.S. even though the U.S. state fails to provide adequate security to its citizens, is corrupt and illegitimate in the eyes of its citizens and has given rise to a massive global state-terrorist operation called the American Empire, correctly identified by Martin Luther King, Jr., as “the leading purveyor of violence in the world.”
“Foreign Fighters,” Imperial/Iraq War Translation: people from outside a U.S. occupied nation who assist resistance to U.S. invasion of that nation. Does NOT refer to U.S. forces engaged in the foreign invasion and occupation of that nation.
The list goes on (the possibilities are almost endless)....
The above is pasted in from The Empire and Inequality Report, no. 8 (January 26, 2007): http://www.zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm?ItemID=11960




Massive Civil Disobedience
By Kissenger, Clark at Mar 07, 2007 19:11 PM
Reply this comment
Agreed
By Kissenger, Clark at Mar 07, 2007 13:22 PM
Reply this comment
One more
By Kissenger, Clark at Mar 07, 2007 04:26 AM
Collateral Damage: Massacre of innocent civilians, especially women and children, can also include irreversible damage to the ecology.
Reply this comment
civil disobedience
By Hgh, Unbelievable at Mar 07, 2007 01:25 AM
Reply this comment
Eastern Europe vs USA
By Kissenger, Clark at Mar 06, 2007 19:44 PM
Reply this comment
What to do?
By Hgh, Unbelievable at Mar 06, 2007 19:06 PM
Reply this comment
Violence
By Kissenger, Clark at Mar 06, 2007 12:22 PM
Reply this comment
I hate to quote a liberal...
By Kissenger, Clark at Mar 06, 2007 08:01 AM
Reply this comment
Two million people stood in
By Anonymous, Anonymous at Mar 06, 2007 00:31 AM
Two million people stood in the streets of manhattan before the Iraq invasion in opposition to bush regime war plans. they were corralled in pens and left to unrinate and defecate in the streets. The so-called media news barely reported it. Many times since large public manifestations have been effectively suppressed (think of the two bush inaugurations) and the public expression of protest rendered mute by the state.
I'm just not sure how the massively disaffected populace can make its views seen and heard in this environment peacefully.
Reply this comment
Pessimism and optimism
By Kissenger, Clark at Mar 04, 2007 20:10 PM
Reply this comment
*sigh*
By Kissenger, Clark at Mar 04, 2007 18:43 PM
Reply this comment
Reflections
By Kissenger, Clark at Mar 04, 2007 17:50 PM
Reply this comment
Orwellian language and other comments
By Kissenger, Clark at Mar 04, 2007 07:27 AM
Reply this comment
Market Crash
By Kissenger, Clark at Mar 03, 2007 08:38 AM
Reply this comment
Here's
By Kissenger, Clark at Mar 01, 2007 17:50 PM
Here's one:
"pro-American": literally, in support of the American people and society, opposing authoritarian state power, unnecessary foreign entanglements, promoting interests of the majority; imperial usage, supporting programs and policies designed, in effect, to destroy everything that makes America great
opponents to America-destroying "pro-Americanism" are henceforth targeted as "anti-American"
Reply this comment
RE: Bush speeches/Presidential word lists
By Kissenger, Clark at Mar 01, 2007 17:42 PM
Reply this comment
oil mentions
By Kissenger, Clark at Mar 01, 2007 13:39 PM
Reply this comment
Hello, I´m baaaaaaack!
By Russell, Mariam at Mar 01, 2007 12:30 PM
I was on Grandma duty for a while, but have been trying to catch up and read the INEQUALITY REPORTS you kindly e-mail to me.
Have just read an article by Mike Whitney, TUESDAY´S MARKET MELTDOWN; GREENSPAN´S ¨INVISIBLE HAND¨ which also uses a lot of language that we who do not have degrees in economics get lost in and so do not really understand what we have read. I do think this is by design as are the language uses you are talking about here.
The time I have left on this Earth, I want to use to insure that my children understand the world they live in as well as I can manage, so I have need of a road map to explain how the ¨Financial Markets¨work and how the taxes we pay, the wealth we create, is turned into a system that enslaves most of the people of the world.
I know this is off topic to some degree, and I apologize, but I think it is a very important use of language to obfuscate a subject that is central to the life we live.
Reply this comment
Hello, I´m baaaaaaack!
By Russell, Mariam at Mar 01, 2007 12:29 PM
I was on Grandma duty for a while, but have been trying to catch up and read the INEQUALITY REPORTS you kindly e-mail to me.
Have just read an article by Mike Whitney, TUESDAY´S MARKET MELTDOWN; GREENSPAN´S ¨INVISIBLE HAND¨ which also uses a lot of language that we who do not have degrees in economics get lost in and so do not really understand what we have read. I do think this is by design as are the language uses you are talking about here.
The time I have left on this Earth, I want to use to insure that my children understand the world they live in as well as I can manage, so I have need of a road map to explain how the ¨Financial Markets¨work and how the taxes we pay, the wealth we create, is turned into a system that enslaves most of the people of the world.
I know this is off topic to some degree, and I apologize, but I think it is a very important use of language to obfuscate a subject that is central to the life we live.
Reply this comment
Sorry...
By Kissenger, Clark at Mar 01, 2007 11:14 AM
Reply this comment
Bush Speech Word Frequencies 2001-2003
By Kissenger, Clark at Mar 01, 2007 11:12 AM
Reply this comment
Bush Speech Word Frequencies
By Kissenger, Clark at Mar 01, 2007 11:04 AM
Afghanistan
2001
80
2002
95
2003
38
This is comming out kind of messy. If anybody is interested I have an excel file of this as well as most of Clinton's speeches. The first number under each word is the frequency for 2003, the second 2002 and the last 2001.
Reply this comment