Zcom_simple

Hello,

Blogs are a familiar feature on the internet - where users post content in an accumulating manner, with comments, and search options, etc. They facilitate expression and exploration, and via attached comments, also debate and synthesis.


Reading and
Navigating Blogs

Our blogs are quite powerful. Each writer can post, as is typically the case. Sustainers who have the option can also post, however. All Blogs appear in the blog system, and sometimes also in content boxes the top page of ZNet - and always via the left menu of the top page - and can be found via searches, etc.

Commenting on blogs follows the blogs, attached at the bottom, and blog comments, like all others, are also visible in many places that show comments including in the forum system. In addition, the entire blog system gathers content for everyone - but one can look at the accumulating content in many ways.

  • For example one can look at one writer's efforts - so one is seeing what is effectively a blog system for that one writer, or Sustainer.
  • One can also look at the content by topic, seeing blogs that are tagged as being about a certain topic - or place, as well. Thus, when doing that, it is a blog system about a topic, or a place, with many contributors.
  • One can look at only writer blogs, or only sustainer blogs, as well.
  • One can look at blogs for particular Groups, too.

All this is easily done using the left menu. Searches allow even more variables and refinements.


Creating Blog Posts

If you are a Sustainer with permission, and are logged in, you will see a link in the left menu for you to post a blog - and you can use that to post one, and then tag it various ways (such as with a topic or place, or a group tag), and once you do, it is in the system with you as the author.

You can also use the console button to the left to post a blog - anytime and from anywhere in the site, as long as you are logged in.

Meanwhile, enjoy the blogs - and, by the way, if you are a Free Member or a Sustainer with a ZSpace page, of course you can put one or more content boxes on it, pulling blog links of any sort you may want to filter for, for example, by you or by your friends or by others - and by topic, about places, for groups, etc.

Blogs

50

David Peterson's Blog

Web Address: http://www.zcommunications.org/zspace/davidpeterson
Bio: I am an independent writer and researcher based in Chicago. (More)

All Peterson Blogs

Iran, the IAEA, and American Power I

By David Peterson at Apr 25, 2006


Change Text Size a- | A+

According to footnote 3 (p. 2) of the International Atomic Energy Agency's February 27, 2006 report to its Board of Governors on the Implementation of the NPT Safeguards Agreement in the Islamic Republic of Iran (GOV/2006/15), this report constituted no less than the 17th written report in the current series, the very first report "on this matter" having been "provided by the Director General orally at the Board's meeting on 17 March 2003" (GOV/OR.1062), the first written report to the Board (GOV/2003/40) having come next in the series, on June 6, 2003. 

Thus, sticking to the 17 written reports "on this matter" to the IAEA Board of Governors, the IAEA&undefined;s various investigations of the Iranian Government&undefined;s implementation of the NPT Safeguards Agreement (and clearly much more beyond this) have produced the following fairly exhaustive series (and please note that I am providing the weblinks to each of these documents wherever this is possible):

1. GOV/2003/40 (June 6, 2003) – 9
2. GOV/2003/63 (August 26, 2003) – 10
3. GOV/2003/75 (November 10, 2003) – 29   
4. GOV/2004/11 (February 24, 2004) – 13
5. GOV/2004/34 (June 1, 2004 [and Corrigendum 1, June 18 2004]) – 21
6. GOV/2004/60 (September 1, 2004) – 24
7. GOV/2004/83 (November 15, 2004) – 32
8. INFCIRC/648 (August 1, 2005) 
9. GOV/2005/61 (August 8, 2005) –
10. GOV/2005/62 (August 10, 2005) –
11. GOV/2005/67 (September 2, 2005) – 15
12. GOV/INF/2005/13 (November 2, 2005) –
13. 
GOV/2005/87 (November 18, 2005) – 5
14. GOV/INF/2006/1 (January 3, 2006) –
15. GOV/INF/2006/2 (January 10, 2006) –
16. GOV/INF/2006/3 (February 6, 2006) –
17.
GOV/2006/15 (February 27, 2006) – 11

Footnote 3 of the February 27 report also tells us that the "Deputy Director General for Safeguards made oral statements to the Board on 1 March 2005 (GOV/OR.1119), 16 June 2005 (GOV/OR.1130) and 2 February 2006."  So, adding the single oral statement by the Director General (GOV/OR.1062) to the three oral statements by the Deputy Director General, we know of at least four different oral statements before the IAEA Board, on top of the 17 written reports produced for it:
A) March 17, 2003 (GOV/OR.1062)
B) March 1, 2005 (GOV/OR.1119)
C) June 16, 2005 (GOV/OR.1130)
D) February 2, 2006
I also know of a very long and comprehensive document archived within the United Nations Bibliographic Information System (S/2006/80) in which the UN Secretary-General transmitted to the President of the Security Council “all IAEA reports and resolutions, as adopted, relating to the implementation of the Safeguards Agreement between the Islamic Republic of Iran and the International Atomic Energy Agency in connection with the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons...."

This document (to which I won&undefined;t hazard to give a title other than S/2006/80) very well may be the single best place to look for all of the most relevant documents bound together (some 216 pages in all)---including copies of IAEA Board of Governors' resolutions on the Iranian nuclear program.  It contains the following set of enclosures:
- Update brief by the Deputy Director General for Safeguards dated 31 January 2006

- Report GOV/INF/2006/2 (January 10, 2006)
- Report GOV/INF/2006/1 (January, 3 2006)
- Report GOV/2005/87 (November 18, 2005)
- Report GOV/lNF/2005/13 (November 2, 2005)
- Report GOV/2005/67 (September 2, 2005)
- Report GOV/2005/62 (August 10, 2005)
- Extract (paras. 48-61) from meeting record GOV/OR.I 130  (June 16, 2005)
- Report GOV/2005/61 (August 8, 2005)
- Extract (paras. 102-121) from meeting record G0VIOR.I 119 (March 1, 2005)
- Report GOV/2004/83 (November 15, 2004)
- Report GOV/2004/60 (September 1, 2004)
- Report GOV/2004/34/Corr.l   (June 18, 2004)
- ReportGOV/2004/34 (June 1, 2004)
- Report GOV/2004/11 (February 24, 2004)
- Report GOV/2003/75 (November 10, 2003)
- Report GOV/2003/63 (August 26, 2003)
- ReportGOV/2003/40  (June 6, 2003)
- Extract (para. 24) from meeting record GOV/OR.1062  (March 17, 2003)

- Resolution GOV/2006/14 (February 4, 2006)
- Result of roll-call vote taken on February 4, 2006 on draft resolution GOV/ZO06/12/Rev.l
- Resolution GOV/2005/77 (September 24, 2005)
- Result of roll-call vote taken on September 24, 2005 on draft resolution GOV/2005/76
- Resolution GOV/2005/64 (August 11, 2005)
- Information circular INFCIRC/648 (August 1, 2005)
- Resolution GOV/2004/79 (September 18, 2004)
- Resolution GOVI2004190 (November 29, 2004)
- Resolution GOV/2004/49 (June 18, 2004)
- Resolution GOV/2004/21 (March 13, 2004) 
- Resolution GOV/2003/81 (November 26, 2003)
- Resolution GOV/2003/69 (September 12, 2003)
- Extract (paras . 52-58) from meeting record GOV/OR.1072  (June 19, 2003)


Last, of course, is the webpage that the IAEA devotes to its work on the Iranian nuclear program, another valuable resource for original material:

In Focus: IAEA and Iran   

Anybody concerned with resisting and even countering the American-driven sense of "crisis" that attends the Iranian nuclear program---but a "crisis" largely because the Americans have insisted on treating it as one for so long, that much of the world mistakenly believes so---needs to keep sources such as these at hand.

Presidential Statement on Iran (S/PRST/2006/15), UN Security Council, March 29, 2006

Press Conference by the Islamic Republic of Iran&undefined;s Permanent Representative to the United Nations (not a verbatim record), March 29, 2006

Presidency of the Islamic Republic of Iran (Homepage)

Islamic Republic News Agency (Homepage) 

Iranian Students News Agency (Homepage)

 

 

 

 
Person

US/NATO are Kosovo & Bosnian "Genocide" promoters

By Kissenger, Clark at Apr 26, 2006 22:13 PM

Hi David, Many thanks for your encouraging comments! It's interesting to note how many US/NATO corporate media claims are accepted as "given" - even by some progressives. Use of phrases such as "...of course there is no question that Serb forces carried out most of the atrocities and ethnic cleansing in Kosovo" or "Yes Milosevic was a brute/war criminal/thug/tyrant/tinpot dictator, but hey, the US/NATO power elites on both sides of the political aisle were just as bad" and other such unsubstantiated nonsense. Then there is the oft-repeated Goebbels style 'big lie' that "well,yes, the US/NATO backed Islamist SDA Izetbegovic faction Bosniak muslims & Fascist HDZ Tudjman pro-Ustasha faction were guilty of atrocities against Serbs (e.g. the cleansing of 600,000 Serbs in the Krajina province from 1990 to 1995 and the cleansing of over a million more Serbs from Bosnia & Kosovo) but the Serbs initiated atrocities first, in a systematic program like the Nazis (e.g. "Operation Horseshoe"), therefore the Serbs deserved what they got". The US/NATO corporate media spin concerning Kosovo (a la CNN's Christiane Amanpour) from late 1999 is somewhat akin to this: "Hi, my name's Wesley. Well, I just had to blow up my best friend's next-door neighbor's house and kill John's wife,dog and his five children while they were sleeping in it,which I didn't mean to do of course, I just meant to kill John, because I heard from this out of town guy that my best friend's neighbor, John, was a really bad guy - a child molestor and drug pusher. I heard he even raped his pet parrot. I mean it was kind of common knowledge, in that neighborhood you know,about how bad John was. Okay,fair enough, I found out later that my best friend's other neighbor Steve, and the out of town guy Bill, did exaggerate somewhat: he admitted John wasn't really a child molestor or drug pusher and didn't rape his parrot after all,and that Steve was actually having a 10 year long dispute with my neighbor John over land holdings adjoining a common fence in their backyards,and yep sure, I admit, Steve blew up John's car,raped his wife and killed John's dog in revenge after it crapped on Steve's lawn two years ago-but John was a child molestor and rapist himself, so I figured hey, what the heck,John deserved what he and his wife got. But at the time the out of town guy,Bill, as well as Steve, seemed so sincere about John being a child molestor, drug pusher and parrot rapist, that I had no reason to doubt their word!! I mean give me a break will you! Even if just one of these charges about John was true, I couldn't stand by and do nothing, could I? I mean my best friend having to endure living next to either a possible child molestor or drug pusher or parrot rapist -I mean,all the more so, when I had so much TNT lying around the house not being used - especially when one day, my wife said: "honey, what's the point of having all this TNT lying about the house if you ain't gonna use it?" So I took my wife's advice, took the TNT out at 3AM and blew up John's house while he was sleeping. I mean,I never meant to kill his wife,dog,parrot and five children, you know. I just meant to stop him from committing his vile deeds. I mean, you have to remember, I was personally told by Steve and Bill -who are both honest reputable journalists that he was a real,real terrible bad guy who threatened to murder Steve's family,and it was common knowledge in the neighborhood that John was a bad guy,I mean everyone was saying it, so what else could I do? It was the only moral thing at the time to do you know, to stop John from molesting all those little children, raping his parrot and selling drugs. In 2006, this is changed to: "John died today in the state penitentiary via lethal injection with poison. John was a serial killer,serial rapist, child molestor, drug pusher,parrot and poodle rapist guilty of murdering Steve and Bill and everyone else in his entire neighbourhood and setting fire to nine hundred houses in the adjoining neighborhoods and surrounding suburbs. Wesley regrets that John's many, many victims including his wife, dog, five children, pet parrot and the neighborhood's poodles will never see justice." The fact that this latest corporate media portrayal by CNN's Christiane Amanpour of the late Milosevic and the Yugoslav conflict has ZERO evidence/justification to support it (e.g.,the Tudjman HDZ Croats & Izetbegovic SDA Bosniaks were publicly committed to genocide of the Serbs BEFORE the outbreak of hostilities in 1991/92 by openly publishing articles and making statements in PUBLIC praising the WW2 Nazi SS /Ustasha personalities & policies of genocide against the Serbs,then by threatening the Serbs with genocide directly by firing them from their jobs, forcing Serbs to carry an identity card with the number "3" identifying them as Serbs, murdering them in their homes and burning their houses down to force them to leave by the tens of thousands as early as late 1990) is of course never mentioned by CNN. Regards, Pete.

Reply this comment


Person

Reply to Peter Robert North

By Kissenger, Clark at Apr 26, 2006 13:31 PM

 

Pete:

This is very interesting and---I believe---important work on your part.  Thanks for sharing it with everyone.  (And feel no need to apologize over being "off-topic."  In any genuinely common space, such as the comments section to this blog ought to be, for anyone to raise a topic is to be on-topic.  Period.) 

For others not familiar with our topic at the moment, see, e.g., "The Bosnian Genocide Promoters."  Or simply go straight to the work of this rats&undefined; nest of interlinked members of the Bosnian- and Srebrenica-genocide Lobby.  (Namely, the 16 different "Links Worth Checking" that the so-called Srebrenica Genocide Blog currently lists down its left-hand column.  Though there are many others besides the 16 listed there.)

I&undefined;d urge everyone to take a look at:

"An Open Letter to Mr. Daniel Lam, of Quebec, Canada, author of &undefined;Srebrenica genocide blogspot&undefined;," Peter North, March 5, 2006

And for three other very fine, yet nevertheless under-read, analyses along the same lines, also see:

"Srebrenica, Mon Amour: An Ostracized Narrative," Gilles d&undefined;Aymery, Swans, July 18, 2005
"Slobodan Milosevic, 1941 - 2006: A Cursed, Blasted Statesman," Gilles d&undefined;Aymery, Swans, March 13, 2006
"The Demonization and Death of Slobodan Milosevic," Louis Proyect, Swans, March 27, 2006

 

Reply this comment


Person

Srebrenica Genocide Blogspot & Mr. Daniel Lam of Quebec, Canada

By Kissenger, Clark at Apr 25, 2006 22:22 PM

(OFF-TOPIC REPLY) 

Hello David,

Regarding Mr. Daniel Lam of Quebec, Canada and his "Srebrenica Genocide Denial" blogspot, see my blog post "An Open Letter to Mr. Daniel Lam of Quebec Canada, author of "Srebrenica genocide blogspot"  at

 http://nato-media-lies-exposed.blogspot.com/2006/03/open-letter-to-mr-daniel-lam-of-quebec.html

and at the blog run by Neil Craig of Glasgow, Scotland:

 http://a-place-to-stand.blogspot.com/2006_03_01_a-place-to-stand_archive.html

scroll down to the comments section under the article post "Milosevic: Murder of the Century"

 

Best,

Pete. 

Reply this comment

Loading_border