Zcom_simple

Hello,

Blogs are a familiar feature on the internet - where users post content in an accumulating manner, with comments, and search options, etc. They facilitate expression and exploration, and via attached comments, also debate and synthesis.


Reading and
Navigating Blogs

Our blogs are quite powerful. Each writer can post, as is typically the case. Sustainers who have the option can also post, however. All Blogs appear in the blog system, and sometimes also in content boxes the top page of ZNet - and always via the left menu of the top page - and can be found via searches, etc.

Commenting on blogs follows the blogs, attached at the bottom, and blog comments, like all others, are also visible in many places that show comments including in the forum system. In addition, the entire blog system gathers content for everyone - but one can look at the accumulating content in many ways.

  • For example one can look at one writer's efforts - so one is seeing what is effectively a blog system for that one writer, or Sustainer.
  • One can also look at the content by topic, seeing blogs that are tagged as being about a certain topic - or place, as well. Thus, when doing that, it is a blog system about a topic, or a place, with many contributors.
  • One can look at only writer blogs, or only sustainer blogs, as well.
  • One can look at blogs for particular Groups, too.

All this is easily done using the left menu. Searches allow even more variables and refinements.


Creating Blog Posts

If you are a Sustainer with permission, and are logged in, you will see a link in the left menu for you to post a blog - and you can use that to post one, and then tag it various ways (such as with a topic or place, or a group tag), and once you do, it is in the system with you as the author.

You can also use the console button to the left to post a blog - anytime and from anywhere in the site, as long as you are logged in.

Meanwhile, enjoy the blogs - and, by the way, if you are a Free Member or a Sustainer with a ZSpace page, of course you can put one or more content boxes on it, pulling blog links of any sort you may want to filter for, for example, by you or by your friends or by others - and by topic, about places, for groups, etc.

Blogs

Occupy_iowa_city_rally

Paul Street's Blog

Web Address: http://www.zcommunications.org/zspace/paulstreet
Bio:         Paul Street is an independent radical-democratic policy researcher, journalist, historian, and speaker based in Iowa City, Iowa, and Chicago, Illinois.&nbs... (More)

All Street Blogs

"Kill Us So Anybody Who Wants the Oil - the Core of the Problem –Can Come and Get It:" On Apes, Cowards and Bad Commercials

By Paul Street at Feb 06, 2007


Change Text Size a- | A+

I was driving in my car today and had the radio on some sports talk show out of Chicago.  A lot of guys in and around the city are depressed.  The big thing, of course, is that the Chicago Bears lost the Super Bowl yesterday. It was terrible.

The other thing is that the Super Bowl commercials were boring.  “None of the commercials grabbed me,” one caller complained. Callers and host went back and forth with anazingly specific and sorry details from different mindless beer, car, and other kinds of television advertisements, detailing the miserable failure of Madison Avenue to compensate for the sorry performance of Rex Grossman and the other Midgets of the Midway in rain-soaked Dolphin Stadium Sunday.  Perhaps the new climate will force all future Super Bowls into antiseptic domes.  

The mediocre, turnover-filled game – the annual climax of an especially barbarian sport that nicely reflects the United States' status as the modern incarnation of the degenerate late Roman Empire – and its (apparently inadequate) commercials were watched by tens of millions of US television viewers. Untold millions of dollars were spent on the holding of Super Bowl parties, as millions of good American suburbanites huddled before glowing telescreens to scream at high definition images of predominantly black athletes trained to cripple each other in a game so brutal that the average National Football League career is down to four years. A large number of ex-NFL players spend their middle-age and senior years dealing with severely damaged limbs, bones, nervous systems and brains (see Daniel Gross, “The N.F.L.'s Blue Collar Workers,” New York Times, January 21, 2007, sec. 4, p. 5; Alan Schwarz. “Dark Days Follow Hard-hitting Career in N.F.L.,” New York Times, 2 February 2007, A1).   

 

Meanwhile the people of “liberated” Baghdad dealt with the miserable fallout from the worst single suicide bombing in the war. Chicago-area suburbanites are dealing with the dull ache of their team's loss and the memory of bad television commercials.  Baghdad's Shiites are dealing with losing 135 people at the Sadryia market in central Baghdad on Saturday. And the way many Iraqis see it, much of the responsibility for these deaths and the wounding of 300 more people during the bombing should be laid at the door of the United States, which destroyed public and civil authority in Iraq in a quest for imperial domination and the control of Iraqi resources.

The quote of Super Bowl Sunday goes to Mr. Abdul Jabbar of Baghdad.  According to the New York Times today, Jabbar “rushed to collapsed buildings trying to help the wounded” Saturday, “finding mainly hands, skulls and other body parts….I wish they would attack us with a nuclear bomb and kill us,” Mr. Jabbar told the Times, “so we will rest and anybody who wants the oil – which is the core of the problem – can come and get it.” 

At 1 p.m. on Super Bowl Sunday, the Times reports, two American humvees and Iraqi patrol passed by the scene of Saturday's bombing. A Shiite Mahdi guard called the soldiers “apes and cowards.”  “They're the ones who brought us the catastrophe,” another guard said.  “If they were not here such a thing wouldn't happen to us”( D. Cave and R. Oppel, “Many Iraqis Say Pace of U.S. Plan Allowed Attack,” New York Times, 5 February 2007, A1).

The guard is certainly correct. 

But there were plenty more  “apes and cowards” sitting in front of televisions in suburban living rooms across the United States yesterday.  They were  blissfully ignorant and shamelessly indifferent to the role of “their” tax dollars and imperialist government in the generation of truly mass tragedies that matter in a  supposedly just incidentally petroleum-rich nation on other side of the Atlantic Ocean and Mediterranean Sea. Those homeland cowards were alternately pissed or pleased with murderous “football” dramas and deadly commercials being transmitted for them by benevolent corporate overlords deeply complicit in the illegal occupation of Iraq.   

Meanwhile Darth Cheney and the new King George delighted in the irrelevance of popular and congressional opposition to the escalation of their vicious assault on the Middle East.  Americans voted against the war in the last congressional elections.  But as Cheney recently told the American people, “it won't stop us.”

He might have added:  “don't you little children have a football game to watch?”   

This is the seedbed of homegrown terrorism, which the administration would love to provoke. 

Person

Good Point

By Kissenger, Clark at Feb 10, 2007 04:09 AM

In a society built upon fear and paranoia, the last thing one wants is to be guilty of supporting that which is behind the fear, the "enemy". No one wants to suffer guilt by association. This logical absurdity leads one down all sorts of paths. Bush loves burgers and fries. I love burgers and fries. Therefore, I must love Bush. Good God, what a thought! Of course, most such ad hominem attacks as perpetuated by the Government are a little more subtle, but highly effective. Witness the cowering of Congress before the argument that limiting the number of troops in Iraq or closing the tap on the money would be placing our troops in harm's way. And that to support such measures is tantamount to treason and deserves all the public outcry it would get. You are with Bush...oops...the troops....or you are not. Do you want troops going without food, supplies, medicines, clothing, ammunition to protect themselves? Do you want that on your conscience? Of course not! So stop all this talk about opposing the Emperor. Instead vote on a measure that states clearly that you strongly support the troops by being behind the President's intent to send more troops, and offer more money to pay for that. Otherwise be branded as a traitor to those who die that you can remain free. To you and I these arguments seem almost juvenile in their naivety, but they are extremely effective, especially in times of social stress. Someone needs to stand up and loudly proclaim "Enough! This far and no further!". The Bush crowd are little more than playground bullies (albeit, highly dangerous ones!). Stand up to them with resolve and they slink back into the dark. But no one seems to come up with the kind of courage that requires.

Reply this comment


Person

Qutb/ Strauss is a good analogy

By Kissenger, Clark at Feb 09, 2007 18:57 PM

I hadn't thought of it. But my "bad company" was an attempt to shortcut the way in which the propaganda system will automatically interpret anyone saying they hate sports. I was lining it up with the "they hate our values" argument. (Hating any American "value" makes you an Islamofascist.) Your replacement of competition with dominance is spot-on. Do you know a book called The Plug-In Drug by Marie Winn? Came out in the 70s. Doesn't get the whole political picture about TV, but covers a lot of the "draining" and controlling aspects of TV culture that you and Ron talk about in another part of this blog. And also Jerry Mander's Four Arguments for the Elimination of Television, from the 70s too. T

Reply this comment


Person

Excellent comments

By Kissenger, Clark at Feb 09, 2007 15:11 PM

Victor, you stir my thinking even more.  The TV thing is absolutely analogous to all the rest of the deviousness designed to "capture" us and "dumb us" down.  Its the old concept of divide and conquer.

I would carry this classic setup into the realm of representative government.  'Let's elect this person (every two or four or six years) and let him/her make all the decisions for us...'   blah, blah, blah.  Is it any wonder why there is so much corruption in politics?  The idea that we can dump our respective responsibility on representatives with the expectation that he/she will do the job that we, the electorate, want them to do.....well, we are only fooling ourselves. 

But, alas!  We have television (sports?) to escape to (after doing our civic duty, of course).  West Wing, Father Knows Best, Beavis and Butthead, the Stupid Bowl...you name it.  Vicarious living at its best...all wrapped and delivered in the convenience of your living room lair.

You are so right:  "the people who rule this country are NOT our friends" but we elected them...well, most of them anyway. And for the masses of the population that have nary a clue as to mega-corp involvement with the greater numbers of these "elected" officials, dumbing down is an understatement.

You have suggested in the past that revolution is the loud call of the vigilant.  I agree.  But leadership comes in many sizes and shapes across all worthy movements and battlefronts.  Under current conditions, the opportunity for our political "elected' officials to become leaders (even in a non-revolutionary approach) means giving up lots of "schtuff"....and most of us know what that is.  

It is a sorry and sad state of affairs, but recognizably dynamic. We seem to be caught in the toilet's whirlpool but, boy oh boy, what ride!

Thanks again for your comments.

R

Reply this comment


Person

It's Not Just About Violence

By Kissenger, Clark at Feb 09, 2007 12:05 PM

It's about pacification actually. And this is an area that I suppose I would strongly disagree with Chomsky, if he indeed did say that he avoided talk of sports. And if I am knitting the brows of fellow leftists, I don't really mind. Let me be very clear about this. Sports are not about clean competition. They are about DOMINANCE. There is a huge difference. Sports are like wolves dressed in lambskin. They indoctrinate one not in the values of fairness and competition, but in the values of violent dominance over everything that places itself in the participant's path. The one who is admired is the one who dominates time after time after time - not the one who believes that the importance of the game is not the result but how you play the game. The one who is admired today is the one who will not accept defeat under any circumstances. The one who is admired is the one who WINS. And that philosophy (psyops message) is carried over into adult life in militarism and the corporate life. Winning is EVERYTHING. No matter the cost. No matter the lives lost. The Law of the Jungle. Evolution's Survival of the FITTEST. This is the true power of the neocon, and the multinational and the military/industrial complex and the banking elites (the true center of power). Only through full spectrum dominance can true victory be achieved. And it is certainly the overwhelming driver behind the entire capitalistic model. About putting myself in very bad company, that's true. More so than you think. BBC had a terrific 3-part series called the Power of Nightmares. Two very interesting things about this series. First, it promoted the idea that governments and leaders throughout the world (including Islamic leaders) have turned to the power of fear to gain the support of the people they represent. Both sides of any issue use fear exhaustively and very effectively in accomplishing their goals. Not surprising. Nothing new there. The interesting part was the second lesson to be learned. The radical leaders of both sides of the current controversy over terrorism saw the same things happening in modern culture, but came to different conclusions as to how to deal with it. The first was, as you correctly identified him, Sayyid Qutb, who was the father of the Brotherhood of Muslims in Egypt and who is considered the father of the modern jihad movement among radical Muslims. His best known student was Sheikh Ayman Muhammad Rabaie al-Zawahiri, al Qaeada's second in command and spiritual leader to bin Laden. The other radical leader who came to precisely the same conclusions as Qutb was a German born Jewish political philosopher who taught at the University of Chicago, Leo Strauss. Leo Strauss is considered the father of American neoconservatism. His students were the likes of Paul Wolfowitz, Allan Bloom, Elliot Abrams, Bill Kristol, and that ilk. Two radically different political positions but united in their assessment of modern civilization - corrupt, selfish, destructive. So I suppose I am in the company of anyone who has indicted modernity in all its self-destructive and hedonistic forms.

Reply this comment


Person

O To See No TV

By Kissenger, Clark at Feb 09, 2007 11:00 AM

Great comments, Ron. I have to say that I wish I had your fortitude! I remain hooked, I regret to say. But there are many channels I can still access for science/technology/environmental content. But there are times when I wonder why I bother at all. You have3 my highest admiration. The greatest concern I have, however, is that the sports and entertainment industry is, like dominant media, a vehicle for intensive psyops against the people. In the first instance the industry captures its audience from a very young age, even using the youngster's parents as the pimp. Once engaged, it's like a sugar addiction - you can't get enough of it, and you sit there night after night, day after day, in every spare moment watching...watching...watching. It's a great way to relax your mind after work. It's a great way to babysit your children while you want to keep them distracted. (Note the analogy - parents find TV just as effective in keeping their kids distracted and mentally occupied as do the ruling elite in keeping the general population distracted and mentally occupied) Once addicted and connected to the communication channel, the subject can be fed messages constantly in many different cooperating and mutually supportive formats (ever notice that when Bush uses a particular phrase like "surge", all his direct reports start using it as well, as does the military, and as do the dominant media? - That's no accident. It's Psyops - which you should be more than familiar with - and it's aimed directly at America's own people from the yopungest to the oldest) But the vilest effect of the sports and entertainment industries is not the messages they convey but the mind-numbing, trance-like state they put the population into, draining them of energy, of concentration, of the ability to critically analyze. A large part of that social indoctrination comes at an early age with the introduction of sports and entertainment into a child's life, and an accompanying general educational system that no longer promotes the art of logic and critical thinking and history. The result - the dumbing down of America, a country that is capable of overlooking the evil immorality in the participation of genocide in a foreign land on the part of its own government but react violently and vociferously, causing network heads to roll, if a football game is interrupted. The people who rule this country are NOT our friends. When are we going to wake up to that?

Reply this comment


Person

Sports

By Kissenger, Clark at Feb 07, 2007 22:42 PM

Silence is okay. Regarding football, this is a true story. I was doing (newspaper) research on the 1980s for an academic in the mid-1990s. In the year I was examining ('84 I think), the World Cup (in what we call soccer and the rest of the world calls football) must have been going on. I ran across a story about then Congressman Jack Kemp (R-NY) ---- a former long-time quarterback of the Buffalo Bills --- reporting that Kemp had gone off on a big rant (in some speech) against soccer. Soccer, Kemp explained, was "un-American" and "socialist" because it lacked the clear class hiearchies of U.S. football, where some people were just big fat proletarian linemen and other people got to be sleek running backs and still more elevated (and whiter?) people got to be brainy, handsome quarterbacks. In evil European/socialist soccer, Kemp declared, everybody got to play the ball and that was just really bad. No fixed class position on the field, the claim went. At this time, Kemp was considered a halfway serious presidential candidate. I stick by the contrast I made but I'm not against sports, personally. To this day if a Chicago (professional) or U. Michigan (collegiate) team is doing well in a major sport I'm probably paying attention to them. It's kind of sad but its imprinted from a young age, like religious belief. Like some people believing in God, I want the White Sox to win the World Series ("I" got this finally in '05) and the Bears to win the Super Bowl ('86) and the Bulls to win the NBA [got six of those in 90s] and Michigan to win the NCAA ['89]) no matter how reactionary and/or moronic and/or barbarian their managers and/or boosters and/or owners and/or Athletic Directors and/or coaches and/or fans might be. It's kind of sad. This is the area where I am just pathetically coopted, though not to the point of buying tickets and attending games; don't really have the money for that at current prices.

Reply this comment


Person

The sad state of affairs

By Kissenger, Clark at Feb 07, 2007 22:24 PM

Victor,

I am not a sports fan in any sense of the word. My friends and associates find it curious that I do not delve into the entertainment aspect of professional sports. They don't understand why a person such as I wouldn't be interested in the latest, seasonal, testosterone driven, high dollar pursuits of all the various related athletes and activities in the industry. After all, I did play football, baseball, basketball...and what else?....ping pong, car racing, surfing, and yes, bowling ...you name it. So why the turn off to pro sports?

TELEVISION!

I am completely drug (television) free. The twelve step program (minus the allegiance to a higher authority) worked. The tube is off forever for me (although I still own a home theater system). And what better reason to drive me to such a goal than watching pro sports on television and, among other stupid things, FOX News and The McLauglin Group, Tucker Carlson, CNN, Tim Russert....ad nauseum.

It seems I read many, many years ago that television will corrupt your mind (if given the chance). Well it did! I was addicted in my youth to the tubular demon (when I wasn't playing some sort of sports). It flowed into my adult years and lingered with an on-again off-again vengeance. But, after years of PTSD therapy - being treated for something I thought I did wrong (Vietnam?) - I came to the funny conclusion that I was being victimized...and then it all came flowing out of me.

I threw off the chains, learned who/what my enemy was/is...and better yet, who my heroes weren't. They weren't John Wayne or Audie Murphy. They weren't Dow Chemical ("better living through chemicals") or FoMoCo, and for sure, they weren't John Kennedy, Lyndon Johnson, and (especially) Richard DICK Nixon. I became a non victim in one fell swoop. At the same time I became a student of humanity.

I am so non sports.

I am so anti-TV.

And, I am so anti-imperialist, anti-capitalist.

Knowing what I was and how I was indoctrinated (The evil side TV and how it currently goes on in full swing), I can truly say that I am cold sober...and glad that I am.

Thanks for you contribution.

Reply this comment


Person

So glad you brought this up

By Kissenger, Clark at Feb 07, 2007 17:29 PM

but it's true you'll be resented by your friends. The barbarity of competitive sports is a huge blind spot, probably not only to Americans but to most people everywhere. It goes back at least to Achilles and Hector, to Krishna and Arjuna. Some time in the early modern period the rulers saw it was an easy way to distract people and enslave their passions. Somewhere in Chomsky he says something to the effect that he learned never to talk about sports. I just read today (in The London Review of Books) that, when Sayyid Qutb (who seems to be the sycophantic scholars' favorite "grandfather" of Islamofascism) lived in Colorado in the late 1940s, among the lewd American horrors that disgusted him was "the crude violence of American football" (James Meek, "The Original Targets," a review of The Looming Tower: Al-Qaida's Road to 9/11 by Lawrence Wright; the current issue, Feb 8; I don't have a link). I readily admit I share this attitude of Qutb's, though of course I "distance" myself from him in other respects. So though you're correct, and I couldn't agree more with your important contrast, you're not only knitting the brows of many good leftists but putting yourself in very bad company as well! T

Reply this comment


Person

What you have to learn Paul....

By Kissenger, Clark at Feb 07, 2007 14:02 PM

Is that an attack upon American sports and entertainment and their impact upon our culture and our energies as a society will inevitably be met, as it has on many occasions with myself, with near......silence. Even from a Leftist site.

Reply this comment


Person

What's happened to us?

By Kissenger, Clark at Feb 07, 2007 13:57 PM

December 16, 1773 - Samuel Adams leads a 3 groups of about 50 Americans to Boston Harbor where they proceed to disembowel three British East India ships loaded with tea bricks. Whilst the act was patently illegal, it served to be one of the prime catalysts that led to the American Revolution. Men's interests in those days were focussed upon fiery displays of political action against the perceived injustices of their rulers, the British Empire. November 17, 1968 - 195 years later, a national uproar of incredible proportions occurred when an American Football League game between the Oakland Raiders and the upstart New York Jets was suddenly interrupted at a crucial point in the game with the Jets just taking the lead 32-29 after a field goal with only 1:05 left on the clock. Fans never got to see the end, in which Oakland made a stunning comeback winning the game 43-32. But the fans did get to see a national showing of the movie Heidi. You would have thought the entire country was going to come apart with fury - network heads rolled, phone banks were overloaded, people ran into the streets waving their arms, fights broke out everywhere. Never, ever, would a football game ever be interrupted again - for any reason. The spirit of the Boston Tea party still remains in America. It's just that those who harbor it are focussed on more important issues today - things of...well... greater priority. Where is our Samuel Adams? Pray he is not a sports fan.

Reply this comment

Loading_border