Zcom_simple

Hello,

Blogs are a familiar feature on the internet - where users post content in an accumulating manner, with comments, and search options, etc. They facilitate expression and exploration, and via attached comments, also debate and synthesis.


Reading and
Navigating Blogs

Our blogs are quite powerful. Each writer can post, as is typically the case. Sustainers who have the option can also post, however. All Blogs appear in the blog system, and sometimes also in content boxes the top page of ZNet - and always via the left menu of the top page - and can be found via searches, etc.

Commenting on blogs follows the blogs, attached at the bottom, and blog comments, like all others, are also visible in many places that show comments including in the forum system. In addition, the entire blog system gathers content for everyone - but one can look at the accumulating content in many ways.

  • For example one can look at one writer's efforts - so one is seeing what is effectively a blog system for that one writer, or Sustainer.
  • One can also look at the content by topic, seeing blogs that are tagged as being about a certain topic - or place, as well. Thus, when doing that, it is a blog system about a topic, or a place, with many contributors.
  • One can look at only writer blogs, or only sustainer blogs, as well.
  • One can look at blogs for particular Groups, too.

All this is easily done using the left menu. Searches allow even more variables and refinements.


Creating Blog Posts

If you are a Sustainer with permission, and are logged in, you will see a link in the left menu for you to post a blog - and you can use that to post one, and then tag it various ways (such as with a topic or place, or a group tag), and once you do, it is in the system with you as the author.

You can also use the console button to the left to post a blog - anytime and from anywhere in the site, as long as you are logged in.

Meanwhile, enjoy the blogs - and, by the way, if you are a Free Member or a Sustainer with a ZSpace page, of course you can put one or more content boxes on it, pulling blog links of any sort you may want to filter for, for example, by you or by your friends or by others - and by topic, about places, for groups, etc.

Blogs

Occupy_iowa_city_rally

Paul Street's Blog

Web Address: http://www.zcommunications.org/zspace/paulstreet
Bio:         Paul Street is an independent radical-democratic policy researcher, journalist, historian, and speaker based in Iowa City, Iowa, and Chicago, Illinois.&nbs... (More)

All Street Blogs

"Liberals:" Do You Need the GOP Back in Power to Get Active?

By Paul Street at Jul 08, 2009


Change Text Size a- | A+
Here is my response to a message I got earlier today on some recent ridiculous right-wing madness from Iowa's ultra-reactionary Republican Congressman Mel King:

"Yeah, King is a scary-ass proto-fascistic nut-job like that crazy Michelle Bachtman kook up in MN. The Republicans are insane messianic miltiarists and misogynists and racists and so on. Christ, look at Sarah Palin. But here's the thing: do we need the GOP back in power so that Iowa City- (and Ann Arbor- and Madison- and Blloomington, IN- and Hyde Park- and Upper West Side- and [you get the idea]) -style "progressives" can remember how to subject policymakers and politicians and other ruling elites/classes to critical scrutiny and resistance? So-called 'liberals" are looking the other way when Empire's New Clothes ("Wall Street Barry" Obama) does one thing after another that would really piss them off if a McCain-Palin adminsitration was doing it. 
 
Sorry, but there's only so long I can keep clapping along as the liberal- left does one more critique of a GOP that I realized was dangerous and insane a long time ago (though Rachel Madow was hilarious mocking Palin in fishing waders last night on MSNBC). The Dems are the other and only slightly less enthusiastic party of Empire and Inequality, Inc.--- actually on empire they may be MORE enthusiastiic. "

For a semi-recent summary of things that Obama gets far too much of a free pass on from "liberal left" Americans (along with some reflections on frankly pathetic liberal-progressive surrender) see http://www.zcommunications.org/znet/viewArticle/21576

On the Democrats: http://www.zcommunications.org/znet/viewArticle/21664
4101

Re: "Liberals:"

By Servo, Tom at Jul 20, 2009 07:34 AM

Short answer: "Yes!"  Long answer: "Hell yes!"

Reply this comment


067

By Green, Chris at Jul 09, 2009 18:15 PM

I'm watching Olbermann and he was talking about Obama's continuation of Bush's insistence about executive secrecy and executive privillege. He was talking with Howard Fineman about this, a leading inside the beltway liberal journalist. Olbermann has talked a little about Obama's protection of Bush's torture policies and so on, but for the most part he talks about relatively trivial things like what crazy thing Ann Coulter or Michelle Bachman or O'reilly or Limbaugh has recently said or how stupid Palin is. And a lot of talk about political horseracing or what false things some Republican has said about Democrats. Usually Olbermann dosen't get to the fundamental problems with our government's policies. Alot of persons on the liberal left seem satisfied with such a presentation, especially since Olbermann expresses himself with such intense hostility against right wingers. Olbermann and Maddow pretty much talk about what every other media outlet talks about, petty political intrigues and horceracing and stuff. Maddow seems a little more to the left than Olbermann and I've heard that her radio show is a little more to the left than her TV show. I saw Maddow once talking about Troy Davis on her TV show. Olbermann spent at least a few days seemingly talking about nothing but Michael Jackson. MSNBC officials probably ordered that their tv shows talk about nothing but MJ but Olbermann seemed very enthusiastic talking about it. Olbermann believes Bush is bad but Hugo Chavez is about as bad. We need media reform, media democracy, so people will be more excited by Amy Goodman than Rachel Maddow

Reply this comment

Comment_reply

067

Re:

By Green, Chris at Jul 09, 2009 18:43 PM

I'm watching Rachel Maddow right now and she is talking about the John Ensign scandal. I can think of many more important things to talk about than the John Ensign scandal.

Reply this comment

Comment_reply

067

Re: Re:

By Green, Chris at Jul 09, 2009 18:44 PM

Her show appears to have led with an in-depth discussion of the Engsign scandal

Reply this comment

Comment_reply

Occupy_iowa_city_rally

Re: Re: Re:

By Street, Paul at Jul 11, 2009 22:20 PM

Chris I agree with you about Keith and Rachel.  Sometimes they surprise me a little on the rare chances when I watch them in full but not so much.  TV aside, I observe that one of the tell tale signs of a a fake-progressive not-so left-liberal surrender monkey is talking about the crazy Republicans most of the time and not focusing on issues with the current party in power and its top operatives. You'd think it was still the Bush-Cheney era the way some of them carry with the bad GOP this and the dumb GOP and so on....

Reply this comment

Loading_border