To:

Zcom_simple
Home » ZMag » Norman Solomon » Making Peace With the War in Iraq?
?1295269164

April 2005

Volume , Number 0
Activism

There are no articles.

Commentary

There are no articles.

Culture

There are no articles.

Features

Grassroots Organizing
David Swanson


Moving On
Norman Solomon


Media
Ken Sanders


Conversations
Cynthia Peters


War & Peace
Don Monkerud


Corporate Fraud
Bruce Levine


Immigration
Eric Laursen


Interview
Jerome Klassen


Labor
William Johnson


Green Tide
Bruce Johansen


Book Review
Edward Herman


Repression
Josh Frank


Iraq Update
Nicolas J.S. Davies


Means of Production
Site Administrator


Social Reforms
Roger Burbach


Conservative Watch
Bill Berkowitz


Mideast
Ramzy Baroud


Labor Struggles
David Bacon


Zaps

There are no articles.

NOTE: Z Magazine subscribers and sustainers have access to all Z Magazine articles here and in the archive. The latest Z Magazine articles available to everyone are listed in the Free Articles box at the top of the table of contents, and are starred in the list below. Questions? e-mail Z Magazine Online.

Making Peace With the War in Iraq?

By Norman Solomon
PDF Version
Printer Friendly Version
April 2005
 Change Text Size a- | A+

S adly, two years after the invasion of Iraq, the online powerhouse MoveOn.org—which built most of its member base with a strong antiwar message—is not pushing for withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq. With a network of more than three million “online activists,” the MoveOn leadership the MoveOn website has continued to bypass the issue—even after Rep. Lynn Woolsey and two dozen cosponsors in the House of Representatives introduced a resolution in late January calling for swift removal of all U.S. troops from Iraq. 

That resolution would seem to be a natural peg for the kind of kinetic activism that established MoveOn’s reputation. A movement serious about ending U.S. military activities in Iraq could use the resolution as a way to cut through political tap dances and pressure members of Congress to take a stand. 

But in recent weeks, the word “Iraq” appeared on the MoveOn. org home page only in a plug for a documentary released last year. Inches away, a blurb has been telling the website’s visitors: “Support Our Troops: Contribute your frequent-flyer miles so that American troops can get home.” 

Why won’t MoveOn support a pullout of our troops from Iraq? “We believe that there are no good options in Iraq,” MoveOn.org’s executive director, Eli Pariser, told me. “We’re seeing a broad difference of opinion among our members on how quickly the U.S. should get out of Iraq. As a grassroots-directed organization, we won’t be taking any position which a large portion of our members disagree with.” 

In sharp contrast, early in the 2004 primary campaign, MoveOn committed itself to endorsing any Democratic presidential candidate receiving more than 50 percent of the Internet ballots cast by its activists. (Howard Dean fell shy of a majority, so there was no MoveOn endorsement.) But now, evidently, a majority of MoveOn members in favor of swift withdrawal from Iraq would be insufficient if a “large portion” disagreed. 

When I asked Pariser for clarification, he replied: “We’ve been talking with our members continuously on this issue. We’ve surveyed slices of our membership in January and in December and surveyed our whole membership last spring. That’s how we know there’s a breadth of opinion out there.” But any surveying of “slices of our membership in January and in December” came before the Woolsey resolution offered an opportunity to find out how the MoveOn base views the measure. If MoveOn leaders were willing to submit the House get-out-of-Iraq resolution to MoveOn’s rank-and- file in an up-or-down vote, the chances of a substantial majority would be excellent. 

The 29 members of the House now sponsoring the resolution are hardly radicals. They recognize the kind of grisly consequences of equivocation that occurred during the Vietnam War: Refusal to speak forthrightly about the urgent need to end military involvement only fuels the war’s deadly momentum. 

It’s very helpful to excoriate President Bush for his many big lies in the lead-up to the invasion of Iraq. But such activities don’t make up for going along with the basics of the present-day Iraq war. Ironically, a group that became an Internet phenom by recognizing and filling a void is now creating one. Other groups are bound to emerge to fill it. 

A mong the emerging organizations is Progressive Democrats of America (www.pdamerica.org), a fledgling national group with an activist focus on the Iraq war. “We’re organizing a new campaign in every Congressional District we can to call for the end of funding for war and occupation, and for the transfer of reconstruction assistance to Iraqis themselves,” says Tim Carpenter of PDA. He contends that “public pressure can awaken Congress to an opposition role.” 

War in Iraq requires continual funding and Bush’s new supplemental boost of $80 billion in war appropriations has been moving through Congress in recent days. Tacitly accepting the war’s continuation, MoveOn declined to take a stand against the essence of congressional backing for the war—the money that keeps paying for it. Meanwhile, PDA launched an effort against the $80 billion; the organizing included a National Call- In Day to members of Congress on March 10. 

Peace advocates do a lot more than shrug when an antiwar organization starts to get lost. If MoveOn continues to abandon its antiwar base, that base will get the picture—and move on.

Norman Solomon’s latest book, War Made Easy: How Presidents and Pundits Keep Spinning Us to Death , will be published in early summer.
Loading_border