Zcom_simple

Hello,

Blogs are a familiar feature on the internet - where users post content in an accumulating manner, with comments, and search options, etc. They facilitate expression and exploration, and via attached comments, also debate and synthesis.


Reading and
Navigating Blogs

Our blogs are quite powerful. Each writer can post, as is typically the case. Sustainers who have the option can also post, however. All Blogs appear in the blog system, and sometimes also in content boxes the top page of ZNet - and always via the left menu of the top page - and can be found via searches, etc.

Commenting on blogs follows the blogs, attached at the bottom, and blog comments, like all others, are also visible in many places that show comments including in the forum system. In addition, the entire blog system gathers content for everyone - but one can look at the accumulating content in many ways.

  • For example one can look at one writer's efforts - so one is seeing what is effectively a blog system for that one writer, or Sustainer.
  • One can also look at the content by topic, seeing blogs that are tagged as being about a certain topic - or place, as well. Thus, when doing that, it is a blog system about a topic, or a place, with many contributors.
  • One can look at only writer blogs, or only sustainer blogs, as well.
  • One can look at blogs for particular Groups, too.

All this is easily done using the left menu. Searches allow even more variables and refinements.


Creating Blog Posts

If you are a Sustainer with permission, and are logged in, you will see a link in the left menu for you to post a blog - and you can use that to post one, and then tag it various ways (such as with a topic or place, or a group tag), and once you do, it is in the system with you as the author.

You can also use the console button to the left to post a blog - anytime and from anywhere in the site, as long as you are logged in.

Meanwhile, enjoy the blogs - and, by the way, if you are a Free Member or a Sustainer with a ZSpace page, of course you can put one or more content boxes on it, pulling blog links of any sort you may want to filter for, for example, by you or by your friends or by others - and by topic, about places, for groups, etc.

Blogs

667096

Brian Kelly's Blog

Web Address: http://www.zcommunications.org/zspace/briankelly
Bio: Brian is socialist organizer, writer, and activist from New York. Brian's writings can be found on his website - Diary of a Walking Butterfly (www.walkingbutterfly.org). Contact e-mail: butterfly... (More)

All Kelly Blogs

McCain: “A 100 [years in Iraq]. That’d be fine with me”

By Brian Kelly at Feb 06, 2008


Change Text Size a- | A+

http://ie.youtube.com/watch?v=VFknKVjuyNk

McCain, possibly the future Republican Party nominee says that it would "be fine" with him if the U.S. were to continue to occupy Iraq for 100 years. When interviewed later about the comments, McCain stood firm, saying that he was willing to stay in Iraq however long it took, even "1,000 years", or "1,000,000 years". The Government is right that the United States can "win" in Iraq. But the left must shift the debate. Of course the Government can "win" in Iraq. The question isn't can the United States Government "win". The question is what does "winning" mean.

Does "winning" mean leveling the country to the ground? Killing all its inhabitants? Does "winning" mean 10,000 American troop deaths? Does it mean 20,000 American troop deaths? Does it mean 50,000 American troop deaths? Does "winning" mean breaking more international laws, treaties and conventions? Does "winning" mean making us less respected and trusted in the world? Does "winning" mean no money for healthcare, none for social security, none money for education or jobs or programs of social uplift? Does "winning" in Iraq, means the people of New Orleans and the Gulf Coast need to lose? Does it mean more people to hating us? Does it mean more Abu Ghraibs and Guantanamo Bays; more Fallujahs and Hadithas; more wiretaps and deportations? Does it mean more fear and hate; more violence and more ignorance?

Yes, the Government can "win" at whatever it wishes - its has the most powerful, expensive military in the history of the world. The question of whether the Government can "win" in Iraq is an absurdity. What we should be asking is "what are we doing to Iraq, to Iraqis, to our soldiers, to our veterans, and to our country?" and, most importantly, "why are we there in the first place?"

These questions all have simple answers. All that requires is that we look at the evidence right in front of our noses. We are occupying Iraq so that United States corporations can control the flow of oil from their oil fields. Plain and simple. While rich men get richer, the rest of us deal with pain, death, and poverty.

John McCain for President?

I think not.

Person

By P, A at Feb 08, 2008 13:44 PM

I like the idea of an article called "If the US Wins; Who Loses in Iraq?" Iraqis, Arabs and other inhabitants of the Middle East that will be occupied by US imperialism. The American people who inheret the debt and other costs of the war. The troops who are mauled and killed occupying the country for tens or hundreds of years, and on and on and on.

 

Oh, and who wins? The top 1%.

 

This sounds like a good essay to write, I like it.

Reply this comment


667474

Re: McCain: “A 100 [years in Iraq]. That’d be fine with me”

By Shadwell, Stu at Feb 07, 2008 05:02 AM

So we all want the invasion to end but its going to have to be pushed from the bottom.

Reply this comment


667474

Re: McCain: “A 100 [years in Iraq]. That’d be fine with me”

By Shadwell, Stu at Feb 07, 2008 05:01 AM

A couple of comments. I think when it comes down to it they will win like the Viet Cong won in Vietnam, and I personally think given the narrowing of cantidates on the democrat side that McCain will win in 2008. You never know for certain of course, but it seems like thats what you get for not even allowing a mildly progressive cantidate in the race. That said even that mild cantidate would have probably only brought combat troops home while leaving thousands of others over there in a truly stupid attempt to place the imperialism under the table.

Reply this comment

Loading_border