Zcom_simple
?1295269164

September 2006

Volume , Number 0


Activism

There are no articles.

Commentary

There are no articles.

Culture

There are no articles.

Features

Protesting
Sara Yassky


Vets for Peace
Lt. ehren Watada


Latin America
Marie Trigona


Memorial
Brian Tokar


Healthcare
Kip Sullivan


Agriculture
Michael Steinberg


Hotel Satire
Lydia Sargent


Interview
Cynthia Peters


Filing Suit
Ari Paul


Labor Notes
Rachel Parsons


Ecology
Sharat g. Lin


Stock Report
Bob Libal


Fog Watch
Edward Herman


Campaigns
John Gibler


Justice?
Adam Elkus


Foreign Policy
Tom Crumpacker


Dorothy Ray Healey, Activist
Marc Cooper


Beyond Same-Sex Marriage
Michael Bronski


Striking
Harry Brill


Advocating
Olga Bonfiglio


Z Papers
Darwin BondGraham


Eyes Right
Chip Berlet


Quiddity
Kaveh Afrasiabi


Zaps

There are no articles.

NOTE: Z Magazine subscribers and sustainers have access to all Z Magazine articles here and in the archive. The latest Z Magazine articles available to everyone are listed in the Free Articles box at the top of the table of contents, and are starred in the list below. Questions? e-mail Z Magazine Online.

Medicare $ Is Not Running Out

Change Text Size a- | A+


O n May 2 headlines proclaimed that Medicare would run out of money by 2018. “US Medicare fund 12 years from running out,” was CNN’s headline. “Finances of Social Security and Medicare deteriorate” announced the New York Times . “Medicare’s fiscal health is declining” said the frontpage headline in the Minneapolis Star Tribune . According to the media, Medicare is going bankrupt. 

The source for these stories was the annual report of Medicare’s trustees. But the trustees did not say Medicare would run out of funds, they said Part A of Medi care, which finances hospital services, would run out of funds. Part A accounts for only 47 percent of total Medicare revenues. Parts B and D, which absorb the other 53 percent of Medicare revenues, are doing just fine. Part B finances physician services and tests. Part D finances drug coverage. 

Why is Part A “running out of money” while Parts B and D are not? Because Part A is financed with payroll taxes that all workers pay, while Parts B and D are financed primarily by “general funds,” i.e., by federal taxes like the income tax. Part B is financed about 75 percent by general funds and 25 percent by Part B premiums that are deducted from the Social Security checks of the seniors who sign up for Part B. Part D is financed about 80 percent by general revenues and the remainder by Part D premiums and a tax on Social Security benefits. 

Parts B and D, in other words, are financed similarly to the way the Pentagon is—with general revenues. Does anyone predict two decades in advance that the Pentagon will be broke in year x? Of course not. No one ever predicts the bankruptcy of Parts B or D in year x. “Crisis” and “bankruptcy” are predicted only for Part A because the payroll taxes that flow into the Part A trust fund finance only a particular program, in this case, Part A.

Assuming that Congress does not intend to stop overpaying the Medicare HMOs (a fact documented repeatedly by the U.S. Government Accountability Office over the last 15 years) and take other steps to make Medicare more efficient, the solution is either to raise the Part A payroll tax or, better yet, shift the funding of Part A from payroll taxes to general revenues. Shifting Part A funding from the payroll tax would not only end the phony Medicare crisis, it would make Medicare Part A financing fairer. The payroll tax is a regressive tax, as it takes a greater portion from lowerincome than upperincome Americans. 

Proponents of the “sky is falling” theory will oppose shifting the financing of Medicare Part A to general revenues as that would deprive them of the basis for their incessant squawking about the alleged “crisis” in Medicare. 


Kip Sullivan is on the Minnesota Universal Health Care Coalition and author of The Health Care Mess (AuthorHouse). 
Loading_border