Zcom_simple

Hello,

Blogs are a familiar feature on the internet - where users post content in an accumulating manner, with comments, and search options, etc. They facilitate expression and exploration, and via attached comments, also debate and synthesis.


Reading and
Navigating Blogs

Our blogs are quite powerful. Each writer can post, as is typically the case. Sustainers who have the option can also post, however. All Blogs appear in the blog system, and sometimes also in content boxes the top page of ZNet - and always via the left menu of the top page - and can be found via searches, etc.

Commenting on blogs follows the blogs, attached at the bottom, and blog comments, like all others, are also visible in many places that show comments including in the forum system. In addition, the entire blog system gathers content for everyone - but one can look at the accumulating content in many ways.

  • For example one can look at one writer's efforts - so one is seeing what is effectively a blog system for that one writer, or Sustainer.
  • One can also look at the content by topic, seeing blogs that are tagged as being about a certain topic - or place, as well. Thus, when doing that, it is a blog system about a topic, or a place, with many contributors.
  • One can look at only writer blogs, or only sustainer blogs, as well.
  • One can look at blogs for particular Groups, too.

All this is easily done using the left menu. Searches allow even more variables and refinements.


Creating Blog Posts

If you are a Sustainer with permission, and are logged in, you will see a link in the left menu for you to post a blog - and you can use that to post one, and then tag it various ways (such as with a topic or place, or a group tag), and once you do, it is in the system with you as the author.

You can also use the console button to the left to post a blog - anytime and from anywhere in the site, as long as you are logged in.

Meanwhile, enjoy the blogs - and, by the way, if you are a Free Member or a Sustainer with a ZSpace page, of course you can put one or more content boxes on it, pulling blog links of any sort you may want to filter for, for example, by you or by your friends or by others - and by topic, about places, for groups, etc.

Blogs

583275

Joe Emersberger's Blog

Web Address: http://www.zcommunications.org/zspace/joeemersberger
Bio: Joe Emersberger was born in 1966 in Windsor, Ontario, Canada where he currently lives and works. He is an engineer and a  member of the Canadian Auto Workers (CAW) union. (More)

All Emersberger Blogs

Michael Moore’s defense of a pro-torturer film

By Joe Emersberger at Feb 02, 2013


Change Text Size a- | A+
Could Michael Moore really have missed who the heroes were supposed to be in Katheryn Bigalow’s “Zero Dark Thirty”?
 
For those who won’t be bothering to see Bigalow’s vile movie, please consider some remarks Bigalow made about her film. These are by far the most honest statements she has made about it.
 
"I want them [the audience] to be moved. I want them to know that this is the story of the intelligence community finding this man. These are incredibly brave individuals, dedicated individuals who sacrificed a lot to accomplish this mission..." 
 
Bigalow was similarly clear about who her heroes were in an LA Times op-ed:
 
"We should never forget the brave work of those professionals in the military and intelligence communities who paid the ultimate price in the effort to combat a grave threat to this nation's safety and security.
 
Bin Laden wasn't defeated by superheroes zooming down from the sky; he was defeated by ordinary Americans who fought bravely even as they sometimes crossed moral lines, who labored greatly and intently, who gave all of themselves in both victory and defeat, in life and in death, for the defense of this nation."
 
A clumsier propagandist than Bigalow would have denied that torture ever took place. Instead her movie depicts torture as one of the sacrifices made by her heroes  - an additional reason for Bigalow's immense gratitude.
 
Bigalow wrote in the LA Times
 
“..we should never discount and never forget the thousands of innocent lives lost on 9/11 and subsequent terrorist attacks.”
 
Bigalow refers to US lives lost – the ones that count for her, not the tens of thousands of innocent Afghan lives lost in the “hunt for Bin Laden.” Some of us may remember that Afghanistan was bombed, right in the middle of a humanitarian crisis, and then occupied for years with that “hunt” serving as the major pretext. Living inside a rich and powerful country gives us the option of easily forgetting. It is as simple as turning a TV channel.
 
How does a film that makes heroes out of torturers (exactly as Bigalow intended) , and that writes tens of thousands of innocent victims out of history, get praised by Michael Moore?
 
There are two very depressing reasons:
 
1)  Moore thinks the movie showed that Obama made the CIA stop torturing and start doing effective police work.
 
And yet Moore also lectures us that “You should NEVER engage in a debate where the other side defines the terms of the debate -- namely, in this case, to debate ‘whether torture works’”
 
I agree completely. Therefore I will not waste any words on which mass murdering president this film really glorifies – George W Bush Bush (as Liz Cheney cheerfully claims about the movie) or Barack Obama (as Michael Moore claims).
 
2)  The feminist spin of the film really impressed Moore. He wrote
 
Oh -- and girl. 'Zero Dark Thirty -- a movie made by a woman (Kathryn Bigelow), produced by a woman (Megan Ellison), distributed by a woman (Amy Pascal, the co-chairman of Sony Pictures), and starring a woman (Jessica Chastain) is really about how an agency of mostly men are dismissive of a woman who is on the right path to finding bin Laden. Yes, guys, this is a movie about how we don't listen to women, how hard it is for them to have their voice heard even in these enlightened times. You could say this is a 21st century chick flick -- and it would do you well to see it.
 
Which women should we listen to?  Could Moore mean the Afghan women of RAWA who have been for years, and at considerable risk to themselves, denouncing the US government's savage misogynist allies in the "hunt for bin Laden"? Of course not. He means Western women who make big bucks - the ones dropping US bombs, propagandizing for them, or otherwise collaborating at a high level with the "war on terror". How enlightening.  
 
Moore should also read up on the US backed Haitian dictator, Francois “Papa Doc” Duvalier, specifically, one of the top people in his torture state: Madame Max Adolph (aka Rosalie Bosquet). Papa Doc ruled Haiti from 1957-1971 and he was more than open to letting women in on the dirty work. In addition to elevating Madame Max to his inner circle, Papa Doc created the Fillettes Laleau, the female version of his infamous Toton Macoute death squad. Why waste female talent for brutality? Not a 21st century insight.
Loading_border