Zcom_simple

Hello,

Blogs are a familiar feature on the internet - where users post content in an accumulating manner, with comments, and search options, etc. They facilitate expression and exploration, and via attached comments, also debate and synthesis.


Reading and
Navigating Blogs

Our blogs are quite powerful. Each writer can post, as is typically the case. Sustainers who have the option can also post, however. All Blogs appear in the blog system, and sometimes also in content boxes the top page of ZNet - and always via the left menu of the top page - and can be found via searches, etc.

Commenting on blogs follows the blogs, attached at the bottom, and blog comments, like all others, are also visible in many places that show comments including in the forum system. In addition, the entire blog system gathers content for everyone - but one can look at the accumulating content in many ways.

  • For example one can look at one writer's efforts - so one is seeing what is effectively a blog system for that one writer, or Sustainer.
  • One can also look at the content by topic, seeing blogs that are tagged as being about a certain topic - or place, as well. Thus, when doing that, it is a blog system about a topic, or a place, with many contributors.
  • One can look at only writer blogs, or only sustainer blogs, as well.
  • One can look at blogs for particular Groups, too.

All this is easily done using the left menu. Searches allow even more variables and refinements.


Creating Blog Posts

If you are a Sustainer with permission, and are logged in, you will see a link in the left menu for you to post a blog - and you can use that to post one, and then tag it various ways (such as with a topic or place, or a group tag), and once you do, it is in the system with you as the author.

You can also use the console button to the left to post a blog - anytime and from anywhere in the site, as long as you are logged in.

Meanwhile, enjoy the blogs - and, by the way, if you are a Free Member or a Sustainer with a ZSpace page, of course you can put one or more content boxes on it, pulling blog links of any sort you may want to filter for, for example, by you or by your friends or by others - and by topic, about places, for groups, etc.

Blogs

Gabriel_caplett

Gabriel Caplett's Blog

Web Address: http://www.zcommunications.org/zspace/gcaplett
Bio: A lifelong resident of Michigan\'s Upper Peninsula, Caplett operates a small, Certified Naturally Grown farm in Skandia, Michigan and works on a regional media project, News from Headwaters Co... (More)

All Caplett Blogs

Michigan US Representative Bart Stupak Opposes DEQ Approval of Kennecott Mineral's Eagle Mine Project

By Gabriel Caplett at Dec 20, 2007


Change Text Size a- | A+

Michigan US Representative Bart Stupak Opposes DEQ Approval of Kennecott Mineral's Eagle Mine Project

For Immediate Release
Contact: Nick Choate
December 19, 2007
(202) 225-4735; (202) 374-4779

STUPAK STATEMENT ON DEQ APPROVAL OF KENNECOTT MINE
WASHINGTON – The Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) announced Friday the final approval of permits for a sulfide mine northwest of Marquette to be operated by Kennecott Minerals Company, a subsidiary of Rio Tinto. The following statement may be attributed to Congressman Bart Stupak (D-Menominee):

"I am disappointed DEQ has decided to approve permits for Kennecott’s sulfide mine in northwest Marquette County along the Yellow Dog River. Having had time to thoroughly review the information, there are a number of concerns I have which still need to be addressed.

"I am not opposed to mining. I remain very supportive of mining in the U.P. However, these permits represent the first time the state is allowing sulfide mining. State officials must take their time and make sure sulfide mining is safe. It is critical that comprehensive independent studies be completed before additional permits are issued. Once permitted, I am fearful as many as six additional sulfide mines will be allowed to operate on the shores of the Great Lakes, jeopardizing the world’s largest body of fresh water.

"DEQ has allowed their permits without requiring an Environmental Impact Statement to be completed. I also believe comprehensive baseline hydrological and geological studies should be conducted by an independent third party. While DEQ has, as I have advocated, required Kennecott to provide a financial assurance bond, I remain concerned that the negotiated agreement does not provide enough funding and does not cover a long-enough period to address potential contamination. Environmental damages often do not surface until years after a mine is out of operation and can be costly for local and state governments to clean up. Contaminated sites cost significantly more to clean-up than the $17 million set aside for this project. With the seepage of kiln dust into Lake Michigan at Bay Harbor, CMS estimates $93 million will be needed to abate the environmental damage, and the ground water leakage has not yet stopped. We must make sure the state and local community won’t be left with an expensive clean-up years down the road.

"I also have significant concerns, given the state of Michigan’s budgetary situation, that DEQ will not have adequate resources to ensure Kennecott is complying with all safety and environmental standards that it has promised to meet. The proposed sulfide mine will require well-trained inspectors to enforce air and water pollution control standards established in the permits. The Kennecott Company, rather than the taxpayers, should be responsible for providing the state with the funding needed for the inspectors.

"The Kennecott Company has yet to prove the sulfide mine will not degrade the community, watershed, air quality or ecology of the area. While the DEQ permits have been approved, additional permits are required by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the Michigan Department of Natural Resources. I will continue to urge EPA and DNR to thoroughly review this proposed sulfide mine."

Loading_border