Zcom_simple

Hello,

Blogs are a familiar feature on the internet - where users post content in an accumulating manner, with comments, and search options, etc. They facilitate expression and exploration, and via attached comments, also debate and synthesis.


Reading and
Navigating Blogs

Our blogs are quite powerful. Each writer can post, as is typically the case. Sustainers who have the option can also post, however. All Blogs appear in the blog system, and sometimes also in content boxes the top page of ZNet - and always via the left menu of the top page - and can be found via searches, etc.

Commenting on blogs follows the blogs, attached at the bottom, and blog comments, like all others, are also visible in many places that show comments including in the forum system. In addition, the entire blog system gathers content for everyone - but one can look at the accumulating content in many ways.

  • For example one can look at one writer's efforts - so one is seeing what is effectively a blog system for that one writer, or Sustainer.
  • One can also look at the content by topic, seeing blogs that are tagged as being about a certain topic - or place, as well. Thus, when doing that, it is a blog system about a topic, or a place, with many contributors.
  • One can look at only writer blogs, or only sustainer blogs, as well.
  • One can look at blogs for particular Groups, too.

All this is easily done using the left menu. Searches allow even more variables and refinements.


Creating Blog Posts

If you are a Sustainer with permission, and are logged in, you will see a link in the left menu for you to post a blog - and you can use that to post one, and then tag it various ways (such as with a topic or place, or a group tag), and once you do, it is in the system with you as the author.

You can also use the console button to the left to post a blog - anytime and from anywhere in the site, as long as you are logged in.

Meanwhile, enjoy the blogs - and, by the way, if you are a Free Member or a Sustainer with a ZSpace page, of course you can put one or more content boxes on it, pulling blog links of any sort you may want to filter for, for example, by you or by your friends or by others - and by topic, about places, for groups, etc.

Blogs

5243

Brian Dominick's Blog

Web Address: http://www.zcommunications.org/zspace/briandominick
Bio: . Brian has taught a variety of courses at ZMI in the years since. (More)

All Dominick Blogs

More Make-Believe Terrorism

By Brian Dominick at Aug 18, 2004


Change Text Size a- | A+
The federal government is either astonishingly incompetent when it comes to prosecuting terror cases in the US, or it the Ashcroft Justice Department simply doesn't care because it's always the allegation headlines that make the front pages while the retractions are relegated to the depths of Section A, if that... On August 6th, the New York Times decided to stick the story proclaiming victory for the feds (scroll down; I verified on Nexis) in an Albany terrorism case in column 1 of page 1 in the Metro section. Now it turns out that the feds used fake ("mistaken") evidence in their case against two Muslim men accused not of terrorism but of money laundering for what we're told was a fake terrorist plot set up by the government. Evidently our government doesn't have enough real, actual terrorists to go after, so they need to turn otherwise harmless Muslims into assistant terrorists in order to proclaim success in the so-called "war on terror." The "fake" evidence was an improper translation which apparently constituted a key part of the prosecution's case. The word "brother", used to identify one of the accused on a book found at an Ansar Al-Islam training camp, was translated by the government as "commander." By mistake, of course. I mean, the word "brother" in Arabic is only used by Muslims about every 5th word or so -- one can easily imagine how an inexperienced translator might not know it... The AP last week jumped at the chance to point out that unnamed US officials were jumping at the chance to point out the first known hint that Ansar Al-Islam has a presence in the United States. Oops. I've only seen the NYT's front page for the 18th, not the Metro front page, so we'll see how much play they give the update they're running, in which they say the "commander" reference was the only link between either defendant an an actual (as in, not make-believe) terrorist organization.
Person

Nice - opinion

By Nadmorzem, Agro at Jun 16, 2007 15:00 PM

Thanks for very interesting article. I really enjoyed reading all of your articles. It's interesting to read ideas, and observations from someone else's point of view… makes you think more. Keep up the good work. Greetings

Visit Poland

--------------------------
http://www.kaszuby.agrowakacje.pl

http://www.jastrzebiagora.com.pl

http://www.wladyslawowo.biz

http://www.eceat.pl

 

Reply this comment


Z

The government acknowledges

By Anonymous, Anonymous at Apr 04, 2007 15:47 PM

The government acknowledges that the two individuals had not planned any terrorist action. Instead, an individual who had a felony conviction for the selling of fraudulent drivers' license was recruited by the federal government - presumably for lenient treatment in his own case -to entice other individuals to help him process $50,000 in funds in exchange a fee. One of the two Albany individuals had allegedly contacted him related to obtaining a driver's license for a brother. The government says at some point the informant allegedly told the two individuals that the funds were related to obtaining a missile to assassinate a Pakistani diplomat, though the FBI admits there was never any such plot.

----

online printing, available now.

Reply this comment

Loading_border