Volume , Number 0
Crime & Punishment
American Journalism: A Class Act
The United States in the â€¦
Stephen R. Shalom
Patriotism Is An Olympic Event
Differing Agendas in South Asia
Bryan g. Pfeifer
Bryan g. Pfeifer
Psychiatric Medications, Illicit Drugs, & â€¦
Martin Glaberman: 1918-2001
There are no articles.Culture
There are no articles.Features
Ruth hubbard and Stuart newman
There are no articles.
NOTE: Z Magazine subscribers and sustainers have access to all Z Magazine articles here and in the archive. The latest Z Magazine articles available to everyone are listed in the Free Articles box at the top of the table of contents, and are starred in the list below. Questions? e-mail Z Magazine Online.
No Child Left Untested
House, dramatically revamps the federal role in education.
Both Democrats and Republicans have hailed the bill, which is largely modeled after Texas standards for testing student achievement. President Bush claims “these historic reforms will improve our public schools by creating an environment in which every child can learn through real accountability, unprecedented flexibility for states and school districts, greater local control, more options for parents and more funding for what works.” These reforms, however, are a massive intrusion of the federal government on local schools and states' control of education. The No Child Left Behind Act mandates statewide testing in reading and mathematics each year in grades 3-8 and specifies state intervention in any school where children's tests scores are not annually increasing.
While this bill does provide increased flexibility in the way states spend federal education dollars, most of the money is tied to mandated testing and in practice will undermine local control of education by linking federal funding with improvements in test scores.
This bill might be labeled “No Child Left Untested.” The continued bipartisan promotion of testing as the solution to problems in education is no more justifiable now than it has been in the past. Rewarding and punishing by test results was discredited in the late 1800s. Current uses of high- stakes, state mandated tests in all but Iowa violate professional standards for test development and use.
For example, high stakes testing programs (those with serious consequences for students, teachers, schools, districts) use a fallible single standard and measure of student achievement, a practice specifically condemned by the professional code of test developers, test publishers, and educational researchers. Also, states have been and now will be more compelled to prepare and use tests without adequate time and attention to proper and justifiable test development. More bad practices will be heaped on already widespread bad practices in evaluating student achievement and schools.
The research over the past two decades indicates test based educational reforms do not lead to better educational policies and practices. Indeed, such testing often leads to educationally unjust consequences and unsound practices. These include increased drop out rates, teacher and administrator de-professionalization, loss of curricular integrity, increased cultural insensitivity, and disproportionate allocation of educational resources into testing programs, not into hiring qualified teachers and providing enriching educational programs.
The winners, with the passage of this bill, are advocates of standardized teaching and learning, and the few large corporations that sell tests and test based curricula, not children.
While the challenges of contemporary schooling are serious, the simplistic application of tests to make decisions about children, teachers, and schools impedes student learning. Comparisons of schools and students based on test scores promotes teaching to the test and undoubtedly cause some teachers and principals to cheat, understandably, in order to make their schools look good on the tests. Punitively oriented testing programs do not improve the quality of schools; diminish disparities in academic achievement along gender, race, or class lines; or move the country forward in moral, social or economic terms. We support accountability, but not test driven accountability that draws teachers and children into a corruption of education.
The most serious problem with testing based educational reform is its singularity of voice, its insistence that education be evaluated and improved in a single way. Z
E. Wayne Ross and Sandra Mathison are professors in the College of Education and Human Development at the University of Louisville.