Zcom_simple

Hello,

Blogs are a familiar feature on the internet - where users post content in an accumulating manner, with comments, and search options, etc. They facilitate expression and exploration, and via attached comments, also debate and synthesis.


Reading and
Navigating Blogs

Our blogs are quite powerful. Each writer can post, as is typically the case. Sustainers who have the option can also post, however. All Blogs appear in the blog system, and sometimes also in content boxes the top page of ZNet - and always via the left menu of the top page - and can be found via searches, etc.

Commenting on blogs follows the blogs, attached at the bottom, and blog comments, like all others, are also visible in many places that show comments including in the forum system. In addition, the entire blog system gathers content for everyone - but one can look at the accumulating content in many ways.

  • For example one can look at one writer's efforts - so one is seeing what is effectively a blog system for that one writer, or Sustainer.
  • One can also look at the content by topic, seeing blogs that are tagged as being about a certain topic - or place, as well. Thus, when doing that, it is a blog system about a topic, or a place, with many contributors.
  • One can look at only writer blogs, or only sustainer blogs, as well.
  • One can look at blogs for particular Groups, too.

All this is easily done using the left menu. Searches allow even more variables and refinements.


Creating Blog Posts

If you are a Sustainer with permission, and are logged in, you will see a link in the left menu for you to post a blog - and you can use that to post one, and then tag it various ways (such as with a topic or place, or a group tag), and once you do, it is in the system with you as the author.

You can also use the console button to the left to post a blog - anytime and from anywhere in the site, as long as you are logged in.

Meanwhile, enjoy the blogs - and, by the way, if you are a Free Member or a Sustainer with a ZSpace page, of course you can put one or more content boxes on it, pulling blog links of any sort you may want to filter for, for example, by you or by your friends or by others - and by topic, about places, for groups, etc.

Blogs

Obama Gives ParSoc Advocates the “Green light”?

By Michael McGehee at Feb 02, 2009


Change Text Size a- | A+

Occasionally I talk to folks about this-or-that use of American violence against some poor and defenseless country and I point out that the recipient of our state-sponsored violence offered peace numerous times.

In 1990 Saddam tried to get out of Kuwait through "linkage."

In 2001 the Taliban offered numerous peace offers to stop the US bombing.

Without fail the proponent of American violence says, "They were bluffing!"

And without fail I respond by pointing out that we should have called them on their bluff for obvious reasons. First, if we value the lives of those who would inevitably get killed in a war we would not rush to kill them. Second, if we called their bluff and found out they were stalling then a stronger case could be made for intervention.

This logic should be considered when reading the "Transparency and Open Government" memorandum issued out by President Barack Obama. It is not too long so I will cite it in its entirety:

My Administration is committed to creating an unprecedented level of openness in Government.  We will work together to ensure the public trust and establish a system of transparency, public participation, and collaboration. Openness will strengthen our democracy and promote efficiency and effectiveness in Government.

Government should be transparent.  Transparency promotes accountability and provides information for citizens about what their Government is doing.  Information maintained by the Federal Government is a national asset. My Administration will take appropriate action, consistent with law and policy, to disclose information rapidly in forms that the public can readily find and use. Executive departments and agencies should harness new technologies to put information about their operations and decisions online and readily available to the public. Executive departments and agencies should also solicit public feedback to identify information of greatest use to the public.

Government should be participatory. Public engagement enhances the Government's effectiveness and improves the quality of its decisions. Knowledge is widely dispersed in society, and public officials benefit from having access to that dispersed knowledge. Executive departments and agencies should offer Americans increased opportunities to participate in policymaking and to provide their Government with the benefits of their collective expertise and information. Executive departments and agencies should also solicit public input on how we can increase and improve opportunities for public participation in Government.

Government should be collaborative.  Collaboration actively engages Americans in the work of their Government. Executive departments and agencies should use innovative tools, methods, and systems to cooperate among themselves, across all levels of Government, and with nonprofit organizations, businesses, and individuals in the private sector.  Executive departments and agencies should solicit public feedback to assess and improve their level of collaboration and to identify new opportunities for cooperation.

I direct the Chief Technology Officer, in coordination with the Director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and the Administrator of General Services, to coordinate the development by appropriate executive departments and agencies, within 120 days, of recommendations for an Open Government Directive, to be issued by the Director of OMB, that instructs executive departments and agencies to take specific actions implementing the principles set forth in this memorandum. The independent agencies should comply with the Open Government Directive.
 
This memorandum is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by a party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.
 
This memorandum shall be published in the Federal Register.
 
BARACK OBAMA

For those of us who advocate Participatory Economics or Participatory Budgeting or a Participatory Society in general we should be jumping on this to organize and call Obama's bluff.

What have we got to lose?
 

684914

By Greenlaw, Sean at Feb 03, 2009 17:30 PM

An interesting idea. Unlike the U.S. government accepting the Taliban's offers, however, it takes quite a bit of effort, both in terms of money and human energy, for grassroots organizations to get together and approach the Federal government, and just as much effort to even be heard after we've called their bluff. It seems to me a great deal can be lost by trying to approach Obama's administration on the basis of his promises and then trying to hold him accountable when it fails. I mean, lets face it, the odds for a real participatory society coming out of Obama's administration are slim to none; the fact that he's bluffing is a basically forgone conclusion. It may well be worth it, and I think it's definitely worth discussing, but I'm not sure if the results are worth the cost, compared to what we might acheive by focusing our energy elsewhere.

How should we go about calling Obama's bluff?

Reply this comment

Comment_reply

Amys_pic_of_me

Re:

By McGehee, Michael at Feb 11, 2009 08:48 AM

dont you think we faced much more hardships and roadblocks when labor unions were confronting FDR? it may be difficult and the odds may be against us but i doubt the costs are too high. how should we go about it? the issue of parsoc is relevant to many organizations many of us belong to and/or support. one important way we can go about it is by pressing the issue internally. but certainly this should be discussed more. I support ACORN but I dont see ACORN getting involved with this to press the issue even though parsoc is highly complimentary to the organizations agenda. there are participatory budgeting groups who are pushing this already (I get their messages on facebook). joining and supporting them would be a good place to start.

Reply this comment

Loading_border