Occupy Wall Street Lives To Fight Another Day
New York: It had all the makings of a classic confrontation. No doubt that’s why all the TV trucks and cameras were in Zuccotti Park in Downtown Manhattan this morning.
There was a smell of blood in the water after New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg made a surprise five minute strut through the Occupy Wall Street encampment in the financial district on Wednesday pronouncing it filthy.
I was there and am not sure what he could see in the darkness. He did not speak to anyone and attracted light heckling.
He had determined that the Police would enforce a call by the Realty company that owns and operates the park nominally to serve the public to shut it down for a “cleaning.”
To the protesters, that term sounded more like “clearing.” They saw the cleanliness issue as a pretext for an enforced political cleansing.
And so the conflict flared. Activists and labor unions in New York mobilized. Even The AFL-CIO sent out an alert urging members to go to the park. By 6 AM the park was overrun with sympathizes.
Sympathetic local politicians endorsed the occupiers in the name of free speech. The City went silent, but behind the scenes the Real Estate company had second thoughts when the telephone numbers of their CEO and international offices were circulated.
A rare outbreak of common sense seems to have erupted. The expected 6 AM battle of Wall Street was called off—for now.
On Thursday, the occupation marshaled a volunteer army of their own cleaners to scrub the park down. The NY Times featured a front-page picture of activists with the headline, "We spruced up the Park, Now can We Stay?"
Deputy Mayor Cas Holloway issued some official speak: "Our position has been consistent throughout: the City’s role is to protect public health and safety, to enforce the law, and guarantee the rights of all New Yorkers,"
"Brookfield believes they can work out an arrangement with the protesters that will ensure the park remains clean, safe, available for public use and that the situation is respectful of residents and businesses downtown, and we will continue to monitor the situation.”
When it was clear the police calvary was not coming, there were shouts of Victory and calls to March on Wall Street two blocks to the South. Police mobilized quickly with scooters and horses. One man was reportedly run over by a cycle, leading to a physical confrontation resulting in arrests.
This festering situation is still underway as I write.
The Police may be preparing a wave of mass arrests after a police commander fell to the ground tussling with protesters.
So far the Occupy Wall Street approach has been non-violent to a fault but tempers are rising on all sides along with the testosterone of the more militant marchers. This violence could have a negative impact on growing public support although recent police overreactions actually swelled the ranks of the protest.
A march on Times Square is expected on Saturday.
They insist that the city does not have a right to prevent protests on Wall Street and question Mayor Bloomberg’s deep ties to Wall Street where he and his company has made billions.
The protesters may have the sympathy but Wall Street owns the property. A story earlier this week reported on how many Wall Street firms hire off duty policemen. JP Morgan Chase recently donated $4.6 million to a police charity.
The Occupy Movement was reported to have sympathizers in 866 cities in 78 countries. It has clearly captured the imagination and support of activists worldwide. More than 700,000 people have signed a petition of support.
The Iranian government, under attack for a “plot“ against Saudi And Israeli officials has endorsed the movement as a sign of a deepening crisis in the US.
This occupation activation continues to focus attention on economic inequality in America and allegedly criminal conduct by Wall Street firms. It is now a big story creating space for dissenting voices that have been denied airtime.
Far right writers like Ann Coulter remain on the attack calling protesters “tattooed, body-pierced, sunken-chested 19-year-olds getting in fights with the police for fun.” Walter Brasch writes, “she claimed the protestors, now in the thousands in New York, are “directionless losers [who] pose for cameras while uttering random liberal clichés lacking any reason or coherence.”
When you spend time with the Occupation, you know this is blatantly untrue but we are in a world where images create impressions that shape conflicting narratives.
Occupy Wall Street has lived to fight another day, but not all the occupations have. Police raided the Occupy San Diego, vamped on activists in Austin Texas and arrested l00 in Boston Massachusetts."
Many see themselves as part of an awakening, an “American Autumn” in the spirit of the Arab Spring There is an ongoing face off between the upholders of a selective “law and order” and a movement for economic justice.
Writes journalist John Pilger, “The Occupy Wall Street Movement is one of the most exciting signs that the US resistance is finally waking from its Obama-induced sleep. This is the critical issue, above all others, that will ignite support across the US. On the day in 2008 that Bush announced the first bail-out of Wall Street, the White House received some 24,000 emails, most of them from ordinary Americans and all of them angry. If the current protests can join up with this populism, in the best sense of the populist tradition, it will give rise to genuine hope -- and, more important, an unerring resistance!"
One side in this continuing conflict has physical power but lacks moral power.
And that can make the difference as we approach the weekend for the official opening of the Martin Luther King Jr, statue on the Mall. It was King who said, “We have a right to fight for what’s right.”
News Dissector Danny Schechter writes the newsdissetor.com blog and made the film Plunder The Crime of Our Time (Plunderthecrimeofourtime.com) on financial crimes and the economic crisis. Comments to dissector@mediachannel.org.





By Costigan, Tom at Oct 15, 2011 13:41 PM
Reply this comment
Re: Neutralization before the movement is too large to control
By Miller, Erwin at Oct 15, 2011 17:49 PM
You will see more of this strategy across the nation in an attempt to hinder the growth of the movement. The "authorities" fear the multitudes who can subsume the awesome power of the police state. To squelch the movement before it attains this critical mass is their highest priority. Otherwise they would have to enter into false negotiations making concessions they could later break as they did in Egypt. The latest reports from Egypt describe violent confrontations which will in all likelihood expand. The avoidance of violence is just as unlikely in the U.S. as numbers in the streets continue to increase. The greed of the ruling class will resort to whatever measures neccessary to maintain control of their ill gotten booty. They will fight to the death and incinerate the world if need be.
Reply this comment
Re: Re: Neutralization before the movement is too large to control
By Costigan, Tom at Oct 20, 2011 04:57 AM
I don't think that a complete transformation of the society is something that the people will put on any "negotiating" table though. A complete social transformation- from the US to the UK to Ireland, Spain, Australia where people entwined together in this movement are standing up and demanding- not asking for- is something that is essential to human survival. Anything less you might as well forget about.
This is where the movement has to be very careful- in what it either chooses to demand or what it realizes it can create. The wrong demands will seriously if not completely ruin the movement.
Hypothetical: some people inside the movement could possibly be corrupted into some sort of push for certain demands which would only see things return to business as usual. But i don't believe the movement could possibly move in such a suicidal direction given it's size, transparency and it's intelligence.
(note: they already are incinerating the world)
Reply this comment