Zcom_simple
?1295269164

June 2005

Volume , Number 0


Activism

There are no articles.

Commentary

There are no articles.

Culture

There are no articles.

Features

Elections Again
David Swanson


MediaBeat
Norman Solomon


UK News
James Quinney


Interview
Ellen O’shea


Music
Bill Nevins


Environment
Jason Leopold


Labor
Chris Kutalik


Structural Adjustment
Michael Ives


Economy
Andy Dunn


Peacework
Daniel Borgstrom


Eyes Right
By pam chamberlain & chip berlet By pam chamberlain & chip berlet


Conservative Watch
Bill Berkowitz


Central America
George h. Beres


Campus Democracy
Stephanie Basile


Reproductive Rights
Eleanor J. Bader


Z Papers on Vision
Michael Albert


Zaps

There are no articles.

NOTE: Z Magazine subscribers and sustainers have access to all Z Magazine articles here and in the archive. The latest Z Magazine articles available to everyone are listed in the Free Articles box at the top of the table of contents, and are starred in the list below. Questions? e-mail Z Magazine Online.

On Corn and Culture

Change Text Size a- | A+


I n Oaxaca in southern Mexico, farmers are no strangers to corn. The crop was first planted in this region some 8,000 years ago and has since nourished generations of indigenous and mestizo Mexicans. Over 300 Oaxacan varieties of corn currently exist, a result of centuries of careful crossbreeding and selection. Additionally, the state of Oaxaca boasts Mexico’s largest indigenous population and three quarters of indigenous caloric consumption still comes from milpas, or communally farmed land, where corn is a staple crop. 

Since the signing of NAFTA, however, Mexico has drastically increased its dependency on imported corn, from approximately one and a half million tons in 1994 to six million in 2004. Despite a 1998 law prohibiting the planting of genetically modified seeds in Mexico, concerned environmental and political groups have been warning for years that contaminated seeds from imported food products would eventually find their way into milpas through inadvertent planting and subsequent pollination. 

Along with 86 other nations, Mexico signed the Cartagena Protocol on Biodiversity in 2000 as a partial attempt to regulate commerce of transgenic crops. The Protocol took effect in 2003, but by 2004, Mexico’s secretary of agriculture, Victor Manuel Villalobos, had already signed a pact with the U.S. and Canada that discarded many of the Protocol’s provisions. The pact stipulated, for example, that any shipment of food products to Mexico from its northern neighbors composed of 5 percent or less genetically modified products need not be labeled “contaminated,” prompting Mexican academic Silvio Ribeiro to call Mexico the “Trojan horse for multinational corporations.” Today, approximately 40 percent of Mexico’s imported corn is estimated to be genetically modified. 

Thus, when Ignacio Chapela, a Mexican-born biologist from the University of California at Berkeley, discovered genetically modified corn plants in the Sierra Juarez mountains in 2000, one could probably have overheard an “I told you so”—albeit a marginalized one— resonating from scientists and activists the world over. 

In recent years, that voice has grown steadily into an international campaign, thanks largely to the leadership of Greenpeace. But even Maria Colín, a legal advisor and campaign coordinator for Green- peace Mexico, told me, “Our work on the legislative and consumer levels would be impossible without the people that work on local anti-GMO initiatives, not to mention the organic corn farmers themselves. Local work is the hope for the future of our campaign.” In Oaxaca, several organizations of indigenous corn producers have joined the fight to defend their crops from contamination, such as the Union of Organizations of the Sierra Juarez, Oaxaca (UNOSJO).

Indeed, it has become impossible to talk about corn in Oaxaca independent of a cultural context. In March 2004, Oaxaca City organizers together with indigenous farmers conducted a militant Forum in Defense of Our Corn, in which they demanded the closing of the Mexican border to U.S. corn shipments, increased testing of crops, and the continued maintenance of community seed banks. In this way, the fight against transgenic corn has become a global issue of the highest order while relying on traditional local customs to sustain resistance. 

Fittingly, Chapela’s arrival in Oaxaca City on February 9 as host of an earlier conference entitled Genetic Survival and Independence: Oaxaca in the Transgenic World resembled as much a cultural heritage celebration as an academic affair. In his keynote address to an audience of several hundred students, concerned city dwellers, and campesinos, Chapela stressed the gravity of the potential threat of genetically modified crops to consumer health and indigenous livelihoods while drawing eerie parallels between multinationals and Spanish conquistadors. Although his displays at times resembled a sordidly entertaining science fair DNA experiment, he made his point unequivocally: “Transgenics will threaten human survival. I don’t think I’m exaggerating.” 

Despite the implications of Chapela’s message, perhaps the most powerful moment of the conference occurred when a representative from an indigenous organization approached the stage with several bags of corn and methodically laid each husk on a table in a symbolic display of Oaxaca’s agricultural richness. Another farmer summarized the situation effectively: “If we’ve been growing corn for thousands of years, I think we own it.” 

Cultural fanfare aside, the main thrust of the conference was clearly toward a legislative statement on the federal level banning imports of transgenic food products to Mexico. Chapela cited anti-GMO initiatives in Mendocino County, California and the state of Vermont as potential examples for the Mexican Congress. 

The conference couldn’t have come at a more ironic legislative moment. On February 15, over the objection of approximately 100 scientists, academics, and organizations, the Mexican Congress passed a new biosecurity law. Despite its hopeful name, the law calls for an unprecedented deregulation of genetically modified food imports to Mexico and hints at the possibility that multinationals like Monsanto will eventually be permitted to sell seeds directly to Mexican farmers, as they already do in the U.S., Canada, Argentina, and much of the developing world. 

On March 7, amid indignant fallout from the biosecurity law, I attended a small, high profile conference on Oaxacan agriculture at the State Institute of Ecology in Oaxaca City. While the local politicians in attendance were opposed to the provisions of the federal law, they had come primarily to brainstorm potential local measures to resist transgenics, among them a state-level biosecurity law that better protects Oaxacan farmers, an educational campaign to train farmers how to patent their crops, and a government-sponsored seed bank initiative. 

Still, according to Issa Hinó- gosa, a grassroots organizer for the Oaxaca City-based Society for the Defense of Our Corn, the apparent greenness of an Oaxacan politician doesn’t necessarily reveal his or her true colors: “Now that the issue has become fashionable, some politicians have gotten involved for the publicity. When another issue comes along, they’ll forget about corn. Things are uncertain, but what’s clear is that government policy always ignores campesinos.” Indeed, since the early 1980s, rural Oaxacan peasants have become increasingly disillusioned with both federal- and state-level government policy. This recent case appears to be no exception. 

But do Oaxacan farmers have the power to beat Monsanto on the cultural strength of their tortilla, or are they destined to become the next collective Percy Schmeisser, a Canadian farmer sued by Monsanto after genetically modified canola seeds had floated onto his land? I asked Gustavo Esteva, one of Oaxaca’s most respected intellectuals and a fierce development critic, if there was any hope in fighting for the future of Mexican corn without the government’s help. 

He pointed out that many successful cases of grassroots resistance have transpired in recent Mexican memory. In 2002 residents of San Salvador Atenco blocked government plans to construct an airport in their municipality for nearby Mexico City. Later that year in Oaxaca City, organizers defeated a proposition to open a McDonald’s in their central plaza. “Such hope in ourselves is not an illusion,” he asserted. “David can win over Goliath if he fights him in his own territory.” 


Michael Ives is a college student on leave for the semester turned freelance journalist. He is currently living in Oaxaca, Mexico, where he volunteers with local anti-GMO organizations and solar technology workshops.
Loading_border