Zcom_simple
?1295269164

April 2003

Volume , Number 0


Activism

There are no articles.

Commentary

There are no articles.

Culture

There are no articles.

Features

Capitalism & Economics
Joshua Sperber


Pharmaceuticals
Yves Engler


Grassroots Organizing
Marie Trigona


Health
Kip Sullivan


Agendas
Matt Siegfried


Z Papers
Vandana Shiva


Editorial
Stephen R. Shalom


Marketing Ideology
Joshua Ruebner


Genetics
Jesse Reynolds


Secrecy
Jeff Milchen


Military
James Ingalls


Fog Watch
Edward Herman


American Newspeak
Wayne Grytting


Space
Karl Grossman


Public Policy
Martin Donohoe


Gay & Lesbian Community Notes
Michael Bronski


Reproductive Rights
Eleanor J. Bader


Newspeak
Wayne Grytting


Zaps

There are no articles.

NOTE: Z Magazine subscribers and sustainers have access to all Z Magazine articles here and in the archive. The latest Z Magazine articles available to everyone are listed in the Free Articles box at the top of the table of contents, and are starred in the list below. Questions? e-mail Z Magazine Online.

Orange Alert for Civil Liberties

Change Text Size a- | A+


L ast October, Senator Russell Feingold asked the Department of Justice to “describe what efforts are being made within the department to broaden the powers of the USA Patriot Act.” He never received a response, but now the American people have the answer. 

A leaked copy of the Bush administration’s draft Domestic Security Enhancement Act of 2003 (DSEA) indicates that even after the 2001 Patriot Act expanded federal police powers while curtailing privacy rights, the Bush administration thinks Americans are still too free and government too small. Like the Patriot Act, the massive Security Act draft contains a few measures that could help catch a terrorist, surrounded by many that propel us toward a secretive police state. 

For starters, the DSEA would revoke key elements of the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), enacted to prevent government from keeping secrets from the public unless a legitimate security concern exists. Currently, FOIA gives us the right to know if a missing person is in the custody of any government agency. But under DSEA, anyone—even U.S. citizens—could be detained secretly in connection with any “terrorist” investigation, a term lacking legal definition. 

Does abandoning this bedrock principle of freedom make us safer? Not likely. The Freedom of Information Act already allows the government to withhold such information if disclosure could hamper investigation of other suspects or events. Under the government veil of secrecy established last year, we have no legal right to know who among the 1,000-plus people secretly detained by the Bush administration since September 11 was charged with a terror-related crime. 

Chemical and nuclear corporations may be among the few entities cheering the DSEA. The Act would grant a long-standing dream of chemical corporations: stripping citizens of their right to know about threats posed by toxic chemicals and the risks of spills or explosions in our communities. Like many Bush administration proposals, this draft smells like a case of waiting for the right opportunity to provide cover for pre-existing agendas. 

When asked about the document, a Department of Justice spokesperson claimed that it represented “staff discussions.” But the DSEA clearly is ready for introduction any time (online at ReclaimDemocracy.org)—perhaps while the public is distracted by an attack on Iraq. 

The DSEA contains many proposals disturbing for immigrants, including increased punishments for violations of the Immigration and Nationality Act. Perhaps the most alarming proposal (Section 501) would give the Justice Department power to revoke a person’s permanent resident alien status or even U.S. citizenship for participating in or “providing material support to...a terrorist organization.” 

Since the 2001 Patriot Act redefined “terrorist activity” so broadly that minor vandalism could qualify, donating to a nonprofit organization that, unknown to you, is on Ash- croft’s hit list could end your life as an American citizen and resident. 

Section 312 would revoke laws that prohibit police from spying on citizens without substantive evidence of criminal activity. This effectively reauthorizes the CIA and FBI to engage in domestic terrorism against activist groups—practices that became illegal after the well-documented COINTELPRO program abuses of the 1960s ruined the lives of many citizen activists. 

Denver area activists don’t need to be warned. Last year, they learned that Denver police had created “spy files” on more than 3,000 activists and 200 civic organizations for their organizing activities or participation in rallies. The Nobel Peace Prize-winning Quaker group, the American Friends Service Committee, is among the groups labeled “criminal extremist” by Denver police.

This would be laughable if the news hadn’t prompted many calls to targeted groups by people asking to have their names removed from databases. Imagine the damage to human rights organizations so labeled at the national level.

These threats are just a few among dozens of proposals within the DSEA. Thanks to a brave soul at the Justice Department, we have a chance to examine this assault on civil liberties before it is thrown on us amid the fervor of attacking Iraq or terrorist threats.


Jeff Milchen directs ReclaimDemocracy.org, a nonprofit organization devoted to reviving democracy and restoring citizen authority over corporations.
Loading_border