Volume , Number 0
There are no articles.Commentary
There are no articles.Culture
There are no articles.Features
People's Global Action
Nuclear Nightmare Goes Critical
The Schools We Want
E. Wayne Ross
Signs of a Police State â€¦
Movement Building Is the Only â€¦
In Memory Of Bhopal
An interview with Tahmeena Faryal â€¦
The Threat Of Global State â€¦
Colombia is the third largest â€¦
Airline Layoffs, Worker Concessions
Extending U.S. Dominance
Urgent Patient Tasks
There are no articles.
NOTE: Z Magazine subscribers and sustainers have access to all Z Magazine articles here and in the archive. The latest Z Magazine articles available to everyone are listed in the Free Articles box at the top of the table of contents, and are starred in the list below. Questions? e-mail Z Magazine Online.
People's Global Action
Cochabamba, the third largest city in Bolivia, is best known as the “city of eternal spring.” But, as Oscar Olivera, a factory laborer and spokesperson for la Coordinadora (the Coalition for the Defense of Water and Life) reminded us at the beginning of the third People's Global Action (PGA) conference, it wasn't the pleasant climate that drew grassroots movements from all over the world to this highland city for a week in September 2001. Last year, Cochabamba became a key symbol of the struggle against global capitalism, when tens of thousands of local people took to the streets against the privatization of their water supply by the U.S. transnational Bechtel— and won.
As a powerful and unique coalition of peasant irrigation unions, coca growers, labor activists, local professionals, young people, and street children, la Coordinadora was able to overturn the contract signed under World Bank pressure and have control of the water returned to the people of Cocha- bamba, although not without costs. At the third massive mobilization in April 2000, where 30,000 people shut down the city-center for five days, the president sent in military units, including a sharpshooter trained at the School of Americas who gunned down a 17-year-old protestor. Months later, though, and spurred by their victory, Olivera says, “the water is sweet.”
News of the water wars in Cochabamba spread quickly via the Internet, and the web of international solidarity—which is at the heart of the PGA network—sprung immediately into action. On April 23, 2000, for example, the front three pages of the local paper in Cochabamba carried stories of a protest in New Zealand by activists known as “The Water Pressure Group” who hosed down the Bolivian consulate in Auckland from a bright red fire truck, bearing placards reading “Bolivia, the World is Watching You.”
This exhilarating feeling of international solidarity began to dawn on me in 1997 as I sat in the blazing heat on a squatted farm in Andalucia, southern Spain. Inspired by the Zapatistas, I attended the second encuentro “for Humanity and Against Neoliberalism,” which gathered together around 4,000 women and men from around the world—trade unionists, peasants, indigenous peoples, feminists, anarchists, ecologists, students, unemployed, fisherfolk, writers, artists, and poets. Conversations that had begun the previous year in Chiapas at the first encuentro were continued; people listened to each others stories, of hunger strikes, seed saving, dancing on motorways, blockading nuclear convoys, squatting land, being tear-gassed, and reclaiming tribal languages. In spite of vastly different contexts, we discovered that our struggles are increasingly similar in every part of the global empire, and that a new, horizontal form of solidarity is emerging.
A Brief History Of PGA
It was immediately after this gathering, at a meeting with representatives of grassroots movements from the South and North, that the idea for PGA was born. It is hard to define exactly what PGA is. In many ways it doesn't really exist. PGA is not an organization, it has no members or constituted legal identity, no central funds, leaders or spokes-people. Instead it is more of a tool or a fluid network for communication and coordination between diverse social movements who share a loose set of principles or “hallmarks.” Even these have been continuously modified or expanded over the past three and a half years reflecting the dynamic, evolving process, which is central to the philosophy of PGA.
The hallmarks were first drafted at the launch of this worldwide network in Geneva, from February 23-25, 1998, and attended by over 300 people from 71 countries. A similarly eclectic international gathering took place in Bangalore, India in August 1999, home to the Karnataka State Farmers Association (KRSS) who, in Gandhian style, have cremated fields of GM cotton and dismantled Cargill's seed factories. These conferences, including this latest one in Bolivia, have been organized, at least in theory, by a rotating group of conveners drawn from all continents and social sectors, and a floating support group. Parallel to these, PGA meetings have also been organized at a regional level (South Asia, Latin America, Europe) and on specific topics (gender, Plan Colombia).
Since February 1998 then, PGA has evolved as an interconnected web of very diverse groups, with a powerful common thread of struggle and solidarity at the grassroots level. These gatherings have played a vital role in face-to-face communication and exchange of experiences, strategies, and ideas. From the G8 Summit meeting in Birmingham in 1998, which was accompanied by over 65 demonstrations worldwide, these have multiplied to encompass the growing list of now household names: Seattle, Prague, Quebec, Genoa.
Delegates in Bolivia
The diverse groups that make up the PGA network are a striking aspect of the conference in Cochabamba, a richness that brought with it tensions and contradictions. Not surprisingly, the largest contingent came from Latin America. This included representatives of some of the most powerful social movements, such as the Ecuadorean peasants confederation, landless peasants in Brazil, the Zapatistas of Chiapas, and the Six Federations of the Tropics of Cochabamba. The latter group, representing over 35,000 subsistence farmer families in the tropical coca growing area of Chapare, was one of the hosts of the conference; the other was the National Federation of Domestic Workers of Bolivia (FENAETROB) who organize for the rights of domestic workers throughout the country, 99 percent of whom are women. There was a strong presence of organizers from women's movements in Latin America, in particular from Colombia, Nicaragua, and Mexico, some of whom are equally active in trade unions, working on gender issues. Similarly strong was the presence of indigenous peoples or pueblos originarios: Quiché of Guatemala, Kuna of Panama, Mapuche of Chile and Argentina, Quechua and Aymara from the Andean region, and Quichua from Ecuador.
Many of the Brazilian and Argentinean delegates were from a new network of young, mostly urban organizations that have specifically organized around Global Days of Action such as May 1, the Prague World Bank meeting or around the Free Trade Area of the Americas. Equivalent in a lot of ways to these groups were those present from Europe, North America, and Australia who have mobilized in the streets of London, Prague, Quebec, Melbourne, Gothenburg, Genoa, Barcelona, and Davos. Delegates came, for example, from Ya Basta in Italy, the Movement of Global Resistance (MRG) in Catalonia, the Swiss anti-WTO coordination, London Reclaim the Streets, and the Comité de Lutte Anti- Capitaliste (CLAC) from Canada. (The airline chaos stopped almost all the United States participants from coming.) Also present were ecological activists from the Rainbow Keepers in Russia and the Ukraine and a delegate from CUPE (Canadian Union of Public Employees), the largest and one of the most progressive unions. Two delegates from Aoteroa Educators, the training branch of the inter- tribal Maori independence movement called Tino-Ranga- tiratanga, were involved from the start.
In spite of huge visa complications and delayed flights, a small delegation from Asia and the Pacific arrived towards the end of the meeting. From India, there were representatives of the National Alliance of People's Movements (NAPM) and BKU, the national farmers federation. From Bangladesh, the General Secretary of the Krishok Federation of peasants and landless agricultural workers attended and a woman from the Aboriginal Association. One of the walls in the main meeting area was draped with banners from the Movement for National Land and Agricultural Reform from Sri Lanka (MONLAR). Among the new groups attending were three representatives of the huge Indonesian farmers federation and a representative of the Nepal peasants association, both with over 10 million members.
Since the launch of PGA, there has been a very obvious under-representation of social movements from both Africa and the Middle East. Unfortunately, neither of these imbalances was rectified at this conference, partly as a result of visa restrictions, but primarily due to a lack of links in these regions. However, four delegates from the new popular movements in South Africa—landless peasants, Forum Against Privatization, and urban struggles against evictions and service cut-offs— were able to make it immediately after the mobilizations at the Durban conference on racism. Other groups from Africa who have been part of the PGA process are the Ogoni and Chikoko movements in Nigeria and peasant groups in Senegal and Mozambique. Important discussions about the broadening of the PGA network in these areas are still to be had. Only a few weeks after the meeting in Cochabamba, for example, Lebanese and Palestinian organizations sent out a call to diverse groups in the Middle East to launch a grassroots anti-globalization movement, spurred by the WTO conference in Qatar.
Criminalizing the Movement
Even in the run-up to the conference, we had been witnessing a steady build-up of new anti-terrorist laws by governments worldwide that are broad enough to include protest groups such as the PGA network. This issue was already high on the agenda for discussion, but with the meeting starting only days after the suicide attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, it gained a renewed sense of urgency. The implications of these attacks on the anti-globalization movement could be felt immediately. The local and national media declared that suspected terrorists were taking part in the meeting. Interpol paid a visit to the conference site. The border was practically sealed to delegates trying to get to Cochabamba, including a busload of people from Colombia and Ecuador whose entry was denied. At the opening assembly, the Bolivian press crowded the panel, waiting for our response to the attacks.
Although no one person or group can speak for PGA, a multitude of voices from around the world expressed a sharing and identification with the sudden suffering and pain of ordinary people in the U.S. These voices equally spoke out against the absurd use of military power against civilian populations in retaliation for these attacks and against the double standards of the U.S. government. Many groups had a very intimate experience of the darker side of U.S. foreign policy. Only a few hours away in the Chapare region, for example, poor peasant farmers come face to face with a U.S. military base as part of the aggressive coca eradication program in Bolivia, much like Plan Colombia.
I found it difficult not to be overtaken by fear in this newly tense situation, but the fearlessness of those around me was overwhelming—people who are already engaged in a battle for life or death in a much more direct way than I have ever experienced. It soon became clear that the rapidly unfolding responses to the attacks only affirmed the importance and relevance of two major themes of the conference, ones that had been proposed long before that fateful September day.
Opposition To Privatization And Militarism
The first of these themes was about strengthening campaigns against privatization and militarism. In the U.S. and Britain, political figures have tried to justify the war on Afghanistan with revived rhetoric about economic development as a panacea, particularly in the run-up to the WTO trade negotiations in Qatar.
In the workshop on land, delegates from Brazil, Colombia, Mexico, South Africa, and Asia described the same stories of lands taken over by agribusiness, either directly or subcontracted to locals, and the subsequent escalation of landlessness, hunger, and urban slums. This rapid privatization of traditional communal lands has intensified with regional free trade agreements such as NAFTA. There was much discussion on the devastating implications of the new Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA) and the regional development plans in South America. Massive mobilizations were planned for the FTAA meeting in Ecuador in March 2002.
Similarly, at another workshop on water, people shared stories of their struggles against World Bank driven privatization plans in Canada, Sri Lanka, South Africa, Spain, and Bangladesh. These discussions culminated in the decision for a worldwide campaign against the privatization of the global “commons,” which includes market-based “solutions” to climate change such as carbon trading. For indigenous peoples at the meeting, this was framed in terms of an all-encompassing struggle for territory and sovereignty and the right of communities to freely organize their societies, livelihoods, and relation to nature.
The discussions around a sustained campaign against militarism were only tentative, but a later meeting of many PGA delegates in Ecuador came up with some more concrete proposals. These included organizing a specific gathering on this issue, inviting movements struggling for autonomy in the context of heavy militarization in areas of strategic geopolitical importance that are rich in natural resources (for example, Afghanistan, the Andean region, Central Africa, the Middle East, East Timor, West Papua, the Balkans, Turkey, and South Asia). Broader links for this campaign will also be made with groups working against the arms industry, the prison industry, police brutality, religious fundamentalism, anti-war groups, women's peace groups, and migrants. One of the most memorable days of the conference for most people was a trip to the heavily militarized Chapare region where the group was welcomed by over 10,000 cocaleros waving hundreds of rainbow colored “huipil” banners, the indigenous flag of diversity.
The second major theme of the conference was a general agreement that we need to localize anti-globalization actions and decentralize the network. We had all witnessed the incredible energy and concentration of efforts in recent years at mass actions like Seattle that brought previously obscure institutions like the WTO and the G8 into the public consciousness. But the growing repression of these mobilizations, manifested in Genoa, the cowardly retreat of the WTO to the desert of Qatar and the G8 to the remote Canadian mountains resort of Kananaskis next June 2002, has raised wider questions about where and how we organize actions.
Issues came up around the burn-out people had felt after spending up to a year planning for one or two days of actions, the increasing logistical problems of crossing borders to reach the meeting places of these summits, and the drying up of many sources of funding for anti-globalization movements. In any case, this move towards decentralized mobilizations was perfectly illustrated by the response of groups around the world to the WTO Ministerial in Qatar. Reports have come through Indymedia websites, for example, of over 120 actions in towns and cities in over 40 countries between November 9 and 13.
These same questions also relate very closely to future international PGA conferences. It was decided in Cochabamba not to hold the fourth one for at least the next two years and, instead, to focus on regional meetings to strengthen and broaden the network at the regional and local level. Also, there were various discussions about having exchanges between movements, where one or two people would travel to another country and take part in a specific campaign with another group, learning from each others strategies and forms of organizing. Another similar proposal was a variant of the “caravan” formula, where, for example, one participant from each continent would travel in a small group to a specific region to meet with groups and research a specific issue, and then feed back to the network as a whole.
A further proposal revolved around the idea of popular education campaigns or consultas, which have been used very successfully by the Zapatistas across Mexico, la Coordinadora in Cochabamba, and in Spain earlier this year. After two massive mobilizations, for example, la Coordinadora held a popular consulta in the area served by the water company, asking people whether they wanted these services to be privatized.
Fifty thousand people voted, and between 94 and 98 percent of the people said no. The basic idea is to build coalitions of social movements in towns, cities, and villages, and together to explore creative ways of getting direct participation, feedback, and debate from a wide cross-section of society. This could be on a range of global issues (e.g., militarism, economic globalization, labor rights, immigration, the environment, women's rights, and democracy) and their implications at a local level. People are already starting to work on popular consultations in Brazil in March 2002 to coincide with Inter-American Development Bank meeting and in Europe in 2004 during elections for the European Parliament in June.
Imagine for a moment a room full of 200 people from around 35 different countries, who speak about as many languages (although translations are only made between Spanish and English in the large group discussions). Some are representatives of movements with 10 million members while others are from smaller autonomous collectives. All come from a wide range of political cultures with strategies that range from working within political parties to direct action outside the system (or both).
There were moments of tension and frustration during the week, some of which raised important issues for the network. One of these, for example, touched on power relations between North and South. The role of facilitator, and with it a particularly Western style of consensus decision-making, was on balance taken on more often by people from the North, and it emerged that many from the South felt unhappy with what was seen as an obsession with time-keeping and with people being interrupted in order to keep to the timetable. The problem partly stemmed from not having adequate time to agree on a process that everyone felt happy with and understood and that reflected cross-cultural differences and decision-making styles.
Another key issue was that of gender, which it was felt had been neglected as a central theme in previous meetings. A number of women also made it clear that they felt that sexism was still very much a problem within the movement and that this has to be addressed.
By far the best
part of the week in Cochabamba were the informal conversations, one-to-one or in
small groups, over mealtimes or in the evenings over the local Bolivian
home-brew “chicha.” It was here that we discovered the most about each other in
the midst of laughing, singing, and dancing together. “What has actually come
out the meeting?” I'm often asked. I think above all it has strengthened
connections between people and the movements they are part of, encouraging real
horizontal solidarity and renewed hope in a time of many shadows Above all, we
made new friends. Z
Sophie Style is a writer and activist based in the UK. For more information: see www.agp.org.