Planning for a ReColonization of Cuba

T he Bush administration’s Commission for Assistance to a Free Cuba, cochaired by U.S. Secretaries of State and Commerce, presented a report to the president in early July, 2006. This “Report to the President” (www.cafc.org) is a  lengthy and comprehensive plan, detailing the steps that the U.S. government and other “vital actors” will take to bring Cuba back into the family of U.S. colonies, which now include some of the Pacific Islands, Puerto Rico, Kabul, and the Green Zone in Baghdad. 

This plan is much the same as the one for Iraq (which was not publicly articulated beforehand). By privatizing what used to be done publicly, it will bring Cuba into the modern, civilized world by creating a capitalist “utopia.” Private entrepreneurs from the “international community” (mostly U.S. corporations) and the “Cuban community abroad” (mostly U.S. citizens), unencumbered by societal restraint, will save the “longsuffering” Cuban people from continuing poverty and tyranny while, incidentally, benefiting themselves. 

The recommendation for the Cuban destabilization activities going on now is to continue or increase everything, especially the radioTV projects illegally being forced on Cubans by U.S. airplanes, tightening the blockade—i.e., fining foreign banks that deal in Cuba transactions, punishing and rewarding foreign governments that increase or decrease Cuba trade, and tightening and increasing punishment for travel restrictions—the cost of which already triples what we spend trying to trace Al Qaeda funds. 

The funding for all this will be a new U.S. slush fund of $80 million, increased by $20 million per year, plus all the dirty destabili zation money (unknown multimillions per year) now being funneled through AID, NED, the socalled NGOs in Florida and the U.S. Interests Section in Havana. 

Under the plan, in the future all Cuban communication, electric power, transport, mining, industry, agriculture, medical, and other productive enterprise will be privatized and the vital actors (the U.S. and its entrepreneurs) will build and create for Cuba a water and sanitation system, a healthcare system, an education system, a transportation system, a communication system, a shelter system (homes for everyone), a food security system (a chicken in every pot), all presumably similar to what we are doing for or to the Iraqi people. Much more than we are willing to do for the people of New Orleans. 

Our“ generosity” to the Cubans is conditioned, however, on their acceptance of a new political economy, which is similar to our own. There’s very little said about what already exists in Cuba and nothing about the effects of our blockade and terrorism against Cubans. It’s as if the institutions, infrastructure, and protective capabilities that have been created in 45 years of independence are so insignificant they’re not worth mentioning. 

Not surprisingly, this plan is rife with the usual code words the Administration uses to manipulate public opinion, such as “democracy” (commercial oligarchy), “freedom” (of the big fish to eat the little ones), “dissenters” (most ly a few hundred U.S. paid mercenaries). The plan is also full of statements about what changes the Cuban people want (with no supporting evidence), but says little about any role for them in pursuing their supposed desires. Indeed, they are treated overall as the objects of a transformation to be carried out by others. They are seen as helpless and ignorant, in need of education and training in the complexities of modern consumer society.  

The plan is to rebuild the Cuban nation from scratch to an eventual capitalist neocolony similar to those that now exist in Central America and the Caribbean. Nothing is said, however, about how we get from present reality to “scratch.” The first six months are said to be crucial. This is when the Cuban Transition Government (CTG) will be set up. Clearly this means a puppet government, such as was created for Afghanistan and Iraq. Funding will consist of an imposed IMF structural adjustment loan, other international bank loans, international investment, especially by the “Cuban community abroad,” and direct U.S. taxpayer help where deemed appropriate. 

Cuban Constitution 

M uch concern is expressed in the plan about Fidel Castro’s “strategy” for succession. Cuba has a constitution, but no mention of it is made in the plan. Nor, seemingly, is one to be written for them, as was done in Afghanistan and Iraq. The plan says that Castro’s strategy is that his brother becomes president when he leaves office, which the plan’s vital actors will not allow to happen. 

The Cuban Constitution was developed at local and provincial levels in the early 1970s and was approved by 97 percent of eligible Cuban voters in 1976. Following the “rectification” period in the late 1980s, it was substantially amended in 1992 by the same process and a more than twothirds vote in the National Assembly as required. In 2002, in response to the Varela Project, it was reaffirmed by a vote of over 8 million, 95 percent of the adult population. 

We now know that the U.S. has been allowing antiCuba terrorist groups like Alpha 66 to conduct arms training sessions in the Everglades National Park and elsewhere. Recently, local authorities in Ft. Lauderdale and Los Angeles have happened on large arms caches intended for another Cuba invasion. The weapons include roc ket launchers, bazookas, Uzis, grenades, and machine guns. The possessors have been charged, but it’s unlikely they’ll ever be tried publicly. In the Los Angeles case the defense of an Alpha 66 member with over 1,500 war weapons in his home is that they were provided by our government.