Zcom_simple

Hello,

Blogs are a familiar feature on the internet - where users post content in an accumulating manner, with comments, and search options, etc. They facilitate expression and exploration, and via attached comments, also debate and synthesis.


Reading and
Navigating Blogs

Our blogs are quite powerful. Each writer can post, as is typically the case. Sustainers who have the option can also post, however. All Blogs appear in the blog system, and sometimes also in content boxes the top page of ZNet - and always via the left menu of the top page - and can be found via searches, etc.

Commenting on blogs follows the blogs, attached at the bottom, and blog comments, like all others, are also visible in many places that show comments including in the forum system. In addition, the entire blog system gathers content for everyone - but one can look at the accumulating content in many ways.

  • For example one can look at one writer's efforts - so one is seeing what is effectively a blog system for that one writer, or Sustainer.
  • One can also look at the content by topic, seeing blogs that are tagged as being about a certain topic - or place, as well. Thus, when doing that, it is a blog system about a topic, or a place, with many contributors.
  • One can look at only writer blogs, or only sustainer blogs, as well.
  • One can look at blogs for particular Groups, too.

All this is easily done using the left menu. Searches allow even more variables and refinements.


Creating Blog Posts

If you are a Sustainer with permission, and are logged in, you will see a link in the left menu for you to post a blog - and you can use that to post one, and then tag it various ways (such as with a topic or place, or a group tag), and once you do, it is in the system with you as the author.

You can also use the console button to the left to post a blog - anytime and from anywhere in the site, as long as you are logged in.

Meanwhile, enjoy the blogs - and, by the way, if you are a Free Member or a Sustainer with a ZSpace page, of course you can put one or more content boxes on it, pulling blog links of any sort you may want to filter for, for example, by you or by your friends or by others - and by topic, about places, for groups, etc.

Blogs

588512

Mark Evans's Blog

Web Address: http://www.zcommunications.org/zspace/markevans
Bio: These things probably tell you something about me - I got my initial education in social justice listening to Bob Marley and the Wailers as a teenager, then in my late 20's reading Chomsky w... (More)

All Evans Blogs

PPS-UK: Redesigning Our Sign-up System

By Mark Evans at Aug 15, 2010


Change Text Size a- | A+

 

This is a proposal specifically addressed to PPS-UK’s IT Team but I have posted it here because I would also like to know what others involved in PPS activities think and to keep the Z community informed about the kinds of developments we are making. 

 

Being part of a local / regional chapter is one of the ways in which members of PPS-UK can get involved in organising for a participatory society in the United Kingdom.  However, at the moment when people sign-up to PPS-UK they do not automatically get put into a chapter.  Instead they are required to use their own initiative to join an existing regional / local chapter or set-up a new chapter for the geographical area for where they live.  If they do not take such an initiative (as most existing members have not) we end up with two categories of members -

1. Those who have taken the initiative to set-up or join a local / regional chapter (what we might call “active members”)

2. Those who join PPS-UK but don’t set-up or join a local / regional chapter (what we might call “sleeping members”)

Although this “sleeping” / “active” distinction within PPS-UK membership is probably understandable in many cases - due to personal circumstances, levels of commitment, etc. and even, in my opinion, predictable to some extent - it is still undesirable and as an organisation committed to participation we should try to overcome it.  We should design our website in such a way that any such distinction is minimized.  Basically this means that we try to make networking between members as easy as possible and with it participation within the organization. 

One way in which we could (quite easily?) overcome this problem, it seems to me, is by redesigning our sign-up system. 

At the moment when people decide to join PPS-UK they click on a “sign-up” link on the home page of the PPS-UK site.  This link takes them to a form that they fill in and submit.  This is free and open to anyone interested in developing and organising around participatory vision and strategy and willing to respect PPS-UK’s  Basic Organising Framework [add link].  The form asks information including -

·    Name

·    Country

·    City / Town

This information goes onto a list of members which can easily be accessed by all members on the site.  However, because the “country” and “city / town” categories aren’t required fields for a member to successfully sign-up many members have not given their location.  Also, because these categories are left open for members to fill in themselves there is quite a bit of inconsistency in the information given.

So we have two problems –

1. A lack of information (where members do not submit their location)

2. An inconsistency in information given (where members give their location but use a variety of terms to describe their location)

I propose that the first problem can be fixed by simply making location a required field on the sign-up system.  And I would suggest that the second problem could be fixed by having a predetermined set of location options for members to choose from.  For example, to successfully sign-up to PPS-UK a new member would 1) have to give their location 2) would have to select from a list of geographical options from a drop-down bar.  The initial options on the drop-down bar might be -

·    England

·    Scotland

·    Ireland

·    Wales

On choosing one of these options a new member would then have to choose a further category that falls within this initial area.  So, for example, if someone chose England in the initial options then would also need to choose from the following options before successfully registering as a member –

·    North East

·    North West

·    Yorkshire and the Humber

·    East of England

·    East Midlands

·    West Midlands

·    Greater London

·    South East

·    South West

 

Additional options for members in Scotland we might have -

 

·    East Scotland

·    West Scotland

 

Likewise, additional options for Welsh based members could be -

·    North Wales

·    South Wales

 

For members living in Ireland there could be -

·    Northern Ireland

·    Republic of Ireland

I have suggested these traditional categories as a starting point for regional organing because it is what people at the moment understand.  However, as these regional chapters become more popular and local chapters are set-up, and self-management develops within them, these traditional geographical categories will no doubt start to breakdown and be replaced by new patterns of organization. 

In addition to these categories we could also consider having “Other European Countries” as well as “Other parts of the World” options.  These additional non-UK categories would help facilitate networking beyond the UK as well as possibly encourage members outside of the UK to establish a PPS organization in their part of the world. 

My feeling is that redesigning the PPS-UK sign-up system along the lines laid-out above would better aid networking amongst members and with it make participation within the organization easier than it is at present. 

187647_730172866_4211116_n

By Moorey, Crip at Aug 17, 2010 03:41 AM

Why not leave room for growth and use the traditional 92 counties in a drop down menu?
- 39 in England
- 13 in Wales
- 34 in Scotland
- 6 in Northern Ireland.

plus whatever terms you want to use for foreign locations...

Reply this comment

Comment_reply

588512

Re:

By Evans, Mark at Aug 18, 2010 17:38 PM

Hi Crip - thanks for commenting!

Perhaps we could incorporate both?

The categories that you propose fit nicely inside the capegories that I propose - right? 

The main point is that we have a system in place that automatically puts people into chapters.  As I say in the blog, the idea is to aid better organisation and make participation in PPS-UK as easy as possible. 

Reply this comment

Comment_reply

Jason_3

Re: Re:

By Chrysostomou, Jason at Aug 29, 2010 15:38 PM

I have put forward a proposal for how we can extend your idea to a decision making structure:

http://www.zcommunications.org/decision-making-structure-of-pps-uk-proposal-by-jason-chrysostomou

Reply this comment

Loading_border