PPS-UK: What We Are About
By Mark Evans at Mar 09, 2011 |
|
On Saturday 26th February the Birmingham chapter of Project for a Participatory Society - United Kingdom (PPS-UK) hosted a gathering of members to discuss issues relating to the organisation. From this meeting it became clear that there are two, rather fundamental, issues relating to PPS-UK that need to be clarified -
- The identity of PPS-UK - where we came from and how we organise.
- The expectations of PPS-UK members - what we do on a day-to-day basis.
It seems that some people have joined PPS-UK without really understanding what we are about, where PPS-UK came from, and what it means to be a members. Given that our approach to organising is new it will take a while for people to get their heads around it, so this is understandable to some extent. However I also put this confusion down to a lack of effective communication by the founder members (myself included).
In the hope of clarifying the situation I would like to make a short statement relating to the two bullet points above.
PPS-UK’s Identity:
Serious organising requires a comprehensive program for social transformation. Such a program is completely lacking on the left - which is surely one of the main reasons why we are having such a limited impact on how society functions. Most progressives attempt to organise around vague notions of democracy, justice, equality etc. Whilst these are fine values it is unclear how a serious program for social transformation will emerge from this approach to organising. This is why we take a different approach.
PPS-UK was inspired by a specific body of work that built on the successes and failures of past revolutionary efforts (Marxist and anarchist) and has been in a constant state of further development and refinement from the 1960’s onwards.
The approach to organising that we utilise goes far beyond nice sounding values and principles - although this does make-up a part of what we do. Our attempt at developing a serious program is based around three key organising concepts -
A) Knowledge - developing a good understanding of how social systems work today.
B) Vision - developing models of compelling alternative social system.
C) Strategy - developing realistic strategy to get us from A (society today) to B (our alternative vision).
With regards to organising strategy is everything! However, it is our belief that good strategy needs to be informed by both knowledge and vision. The knowledge helps to keep us in touch with the realities on the ground whilst our our vision ensures that any successful changes that are made to society, as a result of our activities, move us in the right direction. Strategy, informed by our knowledge and vision, is what for PPS-UK constitutes a program for social transformation.
That said, this raises the additional question of, how best to develop knowledge, vision and strategy? Different theoretical approaches will go about this in different ways. Likewise, different organisations that are based on these different approaches will go about this in different ways. To help us develop our program PPS-UK uses a conceptual framework called Liberating Theory.
Liberating Theory helps us to understand social dynamics and historical continuity and change. We can use this framework to develop a good understanding of how social systems work today (knowledge). But, we can also use this framework to develop compelling alternative social system (vision). The alternative social systems that have been developed so far are -
- Participatory Kinship
- Participatory Economics
- Participatory Politics
- Participatory Community
The combination of this participatory knowledge, vision and strategy developed within the Liberating Theory framework is what gives PPS-UK its unique identity as a British organisation. It is this work that inspired the founding of PPS-UK.
However, it is important to understand that all of this is only intended as a starting point for organising and is not presented as a finished product. PPS-UK is open to further development and growth. But it is also important to understand that such development and growth can only really take place as part of a participatory democratic process. For this to occur we first need a fully functioning organisation (possibly on an international scale?). So until such a time any proposed development to the theory, vision and strategy can only be discussed informally in venues such as the IOPS group forum.
PPS-UK’s Expectations:
PPS-UK has been set-up to help bring together people who are serious about organising for radical-progressive social transformation. It is assumed that people who choose to join PPS-UK will want to participate in some way or another. Joining and doing nothing makes membership meaningless. Joining and organising with others as part of the above program can make a very big difference. Such activities can give real meaning to peoples lives and there is no reason why it can not also be fun - at least some of the time.
As (I hope!?) the above makes clear the day-to-day organisation of PPS-UK is informed by our vision. This means that members of PPS-UK advocate self-management which in turn also means that PPS-UK is a self-managed organisation - members have a say in decisions in proportion to how much they are affected by the outcome of that decision.
People can get involved in PPS-UK activities in two ways:
- They can initiate a new or join an existing local chapter.
- They can initiate a new or join an exist project.
- a commitment of time and energy in running a project and / or chapter.
- by making a financial contribution to a project that they like and / or to their local chapter.
All members have voting rights. However, there might be people who want to get involved in PPS-UK but don’t fully understand what we are about and how we organise. These ‘supporters” should be allowed to participate in PPS-UK activities and whilst doing so should strive to gain an understanding of how PPS-UK functions. However during this period supporters should not have any voting rights until they decide that they would like to have full membership and have demonstrated a reasonable understanding of how PPS-UK organises.
I hope that has helped to clarify what PPS-UK is about!
Further Reading:
For an in-depth account of Liberating Theory read Michael Albert, Leslie Cagan, Noam Chomsky, Robin Hahnel, Mel King, Lydia Sargent, Holly Sklar, “Liberating Theory”.
For a shorter introduction to Liberating Theory read Chapter One of Robin Hahnel’s “The ABC’s of Political Economy”.
For a general introduction into participatory vision and strategy read Michael Albert’s “Realising Hope”.
For online information visit ZNet's ParEcon and ParSoc pages.



Projects/Local chapters vs Nested Council
By Johnston, Jack at Mar 17, 2011 12:37 PM
A Political System for a Good Society, Shalom 08: http://www.zcommunications.org/znet/viewArticle/3854
Parpol: A Political Vision for a Good Society, Shalom 05:
http://www.zmag.org/znet/viewArticle/4957
Reply this comment
Re: Projects/Local chapters vs Nested Council
By Evans, Mark at Mar 19, 2011 22:18 PM
1) understand what PPS-UK is about.
2) commit time / money to the organisation.
The difficulty we seem to have got ourselves into is that most of our members don’t seem to understand what PPS-UK is about or are prepared to commit time / money to the organisation.
Im not sure why this is but in the above blog Im suggesting that it could be down to a communications failure on the part of the founder members. I suspect that some people just see the word "participate", like the sound of that and join but with no intention of actually participating, or assume it is a free-for-all kind of organisation where members just participate in any way they feel like without actually looking at what we are really about.
I dont think we can just ignore this and move ahead as you suggest.
If we can identify a group of members within the existing membership who do understand and agree with Liberating Theory and ParSoc vision and strategy, and grant these members voting rights, then we will be able to move forward towards a functioning organisation.
Any suggestions on how we might do this are more than welcome.
Reply this comment
Re: Re: Projects/Local chapters vs Nested Council
By Johnston, Jack at Mar 20, 2011 11:37 AM
Im not sure about the communication failure of which you speak, but i think there has been a failure to create the nested council structure within ppsuk. Instead of having a load of regional chapters that are federated through the nested council we have a load of isolated and marginalised regional chapters and a load of projects that only deal with one issue (meaning that people have to join every single project when all they should have to do is join their regional chapter).
The projects should be scrapped and regional chapters asked to elect delegates. Until we do this we are not practicing what we preach and therefore cannot expect people to understand what we are about.
Reply this comment
Re: Re: Projects/Local chapters vs Nested Council
By Evans, Mark at Mar 20, 2011 22:27 PM
Just out of interest do you hold the same view regarding setting-up a nested council structure on an international scale? Do you also think that IOPS members should already be doing this? Or is your criticism specific to the UK - and if so why?
“How will we ever get members that understand that we are about implementing the nested council (in society as a whole) if we don’t first implement the nested council (in our organisation)?”
The idea is to implement the nested council structure within our organisation - but we cant just do this without first identifying a group of people who understand and are committed to this vision and can actually make it real and meaningful in some sense.
“I cant think of any better way to learn about what the nested council means than actually participating in it.”
That is probably true but to get things started we first need to identify an initial group of people - this is what we have been trying to do over the past couple of years (with some success). Maybe you think we already have that group of people inside PPS-UK? If so let me know who they are.
“we have a load of isolated and marginalised regional chapters”
In reply I would point out that these chapters are only isolated (in as much as they are) because they choose not to communicate with each other and not because of some feature of PPS-UK that blocks them. There is NOTHING stopping members of local chapters communicating with each other and setting up meetings at the regional and National level - in fact our site facilitates for this.
So why doesn’t this happen? As I have stated my answer is that most members don’t -
1) understand what PPS-UK is about.
2) commit time / money to the organisation.
Now if we could identify a group of people here in the UK who do understand and are committed to participatory vision and strategy then we could start to do what we all want which is to establish a functioning self-managed organisations inspired and informed by our shared vision of an alternative society.
To my mind the logic - that we first need members who understand and are committed to ParSoc before we can have a functioning organisation - is pretty straightforward. PPS-UK was set-up to help identify such people in order to facilitate the creation of a functioning organisation. To some extent this has been successful - I now know a number of people here in the UK who understand and seem committed to parsoc vision and strategy and we are all getting to know each other. However, along the way, we also seem to have attracted members who dont understand what PPS-UK is about and that have no commitment to the organisation. That is the problem I think we need to address and I think we should do this by clarifying our organisations identity and membership expectations. Hopefully this will draw in more of the kind of people we need to move towards a functioning organisation.
But if members of PPS-UK (like yourself maybe?) would like to try a different approach at moving the organisation forward then feel free to experiment and good luck!
Reply this comment
Re: Re: Re: Projects/Local chapters vs Nested Council
By Allen, Matt at Mar 21, 2011 10:57 AM
Have it informal but divided up into two broad subjects - one, where everyone talks about the sort of society they would like to see, and what direction needs to be taken to get there. Two would be where some actual pareconists talk about their vision of a good society and what sort of organisation is needed to work towards it. Workshops could be subdivded if they're too large of course.
Finish with a plenary where everyone is free to give feedback and sum up.
It should be clear to all attendees from the begining that the intention of the day school is to recruit to PPS-UK and make the pareconist argument.
At the end of the day all particpents who feel that the pareconist arguments make the most sense and agree with the need to organise in the prescribed way for common goals should be invited to pay up and join a specific membership based organisation.
Obviously you would want to have a proposed constitution for the organisation already drawn up and circulated beforehand so people have no excuse for not understanding what it is you want.
It's not rocket science.
Reply this comment
Re: Re: Re: Re: Projects/Local chapters vs Nested Council
By Evans, Mark at Mar 21, 2011 11:48 AM
For example, at the last gathering I presented an intro to PPS-UK in the hope of clarifying where we came from and what we are about. Some non-members where also invited to attend this part of the gathering. The intended result of this presentation was to both attract new members and to help inform the future direction of PPS-UK.
I think the London chapter also puts on the occasional workshop.
Last year we also organised a UK tour for Michael Albert, where he did over 20 talks in different parts of the country, with the same kind of things in mind.
I agree that it is not rocket science but, with so few dedicated members, it is hard and time consuming work.
But if you are interested in organising such a day school then Im sure others in PPS-UK would be interested. Maybe try posting something on our forum???
Reply this comment
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Projects/Local chapters vs Nested Council
By Allen, Matt at Mar 21, 2011 20:30 PM
I'm not sure I would be the right person to organise a day school, given that I'm not yet convinced PPS-UK is the ideal vehicle for driving forward a libertarian socialist vision. I would be happy to attend and participate and make a decision afterwards though.
Reply this comment
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Projects/Local chapters vs Nested Council
By Evans, Mark at Mar 22, 2011 15:35 PM
Ill try to pick-up on them there.
Also, perhaps you will consider attending our next gathering.
Reply this comment