Zcom_simple

Hello,

Blogs are a familiar feature on the internet - where users post content in an accumulating manner, with comments, and search options, etc. They facilitate expression and exploration, and via attached comments, also debate and synthesis.


Reading and
Navigating Blogs

Our blogs are quite powerful. Each writer can post, as is typically the case. Sustainers who have the option can also post, however. All Blogs appear in the blog system, and sometimes also in content boxes the top page of ZNet - and always via the left menu of the top page - and can be found via searches, etc.

Commenting on blogs follows the blogs, attached at the bottom, and blog comments, like all others, are also visible in many places that show comments including in the forum system. In addition, the entire blog system gathers content for everyone - but one can look at the accumulating content in many ways.

  • For example one can look at one writer's efforts - so one is seeing what is effectively a blog system for that one writer, or Sustainer.
  • One can also look at the content by topic, seeing blogs that are tagged as being about a certain topic - or place, as well. Thus, when doing that, it is a blog system about a topic, or a place, with many contributors.
  • One can look at only writer blogs, or only sustainer blogs, as well.
  • One can look at blogs for particular Groups, too.

All this is easily done using the left menu. Searches allow even more variables and refinements.


Creating Blog Posts

If you are a Sustainer with permission, and are logged in, you will see a link in the left menu for you to post a blog - and you can use that to post one, and then tag it various ways (such as with a topic or place, or a group tag), and once you do, it is in the system with you as the author.

You can also use the console button to the left to post a blog - anytime and from anywhere in the site, as long as you are logged in.

Meanwhile, enjoy the blogs - and, by the way, if you are a Free Member or a Sustainer with a ZSpace page, of course you can put one or more content boxes on it, pulling blog links of any sort you may want to filter for, for example, by you or by your friends or by others - and by topic, about places, for groups, etc.

Blogs

50

David Peterson's Blog

Web Address: http://www.zcommunications.org/zspace/davidpeterson
Bio: I am an independent writer and researcher based in Chicago. (More)

All Peterson Blogs

Question of the Moment

By David Peterson at Dec 07, 2006


Change Text Size a- | A+

Meet Prime Minister Grave and President Deteriorating.  Have you ever seen two more diminished figures than these?  In the annals of slam-dunk wars of aggression and the holding of news conferences to justify them at a later stage, theirs are the shrunken heads of historical regimes.

Wednesday (December 6) witnessed the release of the much-heralded Iraq Study Group Report.  Fortunately for us here at ZNet, the "unanimous view" of this 80-some-page document can be summed up in fewer than 50 words.  Namely (and correcting for the document's governing rhetoric):
The Americans may have gone into Iraq to enhance their wealth and power.  But now, some 45 months on, it turns out that they are poorer and weaker than they were before. Already great, the risk of dramatic decline threatens to become catastrophic.  Shit

I suppose, then, that the Question of the Moment is (or at least it ought to be): How should we receive The Iraq Study Group Report?

Simultaneously as an "anticlimax" and the "absolute refutation of the cult of U.S. unilateralism that has driven foreign policy under Mr. Bush," the latter now passing for "conventional wisdom" around Washington, thanks to a "radical shift in thinking about Iraq" and the dramatic successes of the anti-occupation resistance? ("Talking sense on Iraq," Toronto Globe and Mail.)  

As a "last-ditch strategy to stabilize Iraq," one that "has already been embraced in large measure by the Iraqi government and U.S. military commanders, if not explicitly by President Bush"? ("The Study Group Reports," Washington Post.)

How about as a "carefully crafted compromise designed to ensure consensus among its own membership rather than a precise plan for the Pentagon," the report's "real importance" lying in the "political opportunity that it offers to the White House and Pentagon, not its detailed proposals"? ("Quick Study," The Times.)

Perhaps as an "implicit repudiation of the entire divisive international and domestic political project that President George Bush has pursued since 9/11, with the unfailing and dismaying public support of Tony Blair"? ("If not now, when?" The Guardian.)  

Even as a "stunning indictment of Mr. Bush's failure--in Iraq and no less in Washington," and an effort to "to avert the worst scenario, in which a stubborn George W. Bush spends the next two years blindly insisting he will accept nothing short of victory, while Iraq keeps spiraling out of control and the Iraqis get no closer to being able to contain the chaos after the Americans leave"?  ("Welcome Political Cover," New York Times.)

Or as the proverbial lead balloon--pre-emptively deflated by events in the real world, at most seconding in words what already has been determined on the ground?

Iraq Study Group (Homepage), United States Institute of Peace 
The Iraq Study Group Report, James A. Baker III and Lee H. Hamilton, December 6, 2006  (For the PDF version of the complete report.)
"Testimony on the Report of the Iraq Study Group," U.S. Senate Committee on Armed Services, December 7, 2006

"Joint Statement by the President of the United States and the Prime Minister of Iraq," White House Office of the Press Secretary, November 30, 2006 
"Background Press Briefing by a Senior Administration Official on the President's Meetings with Prime Minister Maliki," White House Office of the Press Secretary, November 30, 2006

"President Bush Receives Report from the Iraq Study Group," White House Office of the Press Secretary, December 6, 2006 
"President Bush Meets with British Prime Minister Tony Blair," White House Office of the Press Secretary, December 7, 2006

 
National Strategy for Victory in Iraq, White House Office of the Press Secretary, November 30, 2005.  (For the PDF version of the complete report.)
"Renewal in Iraq" (Homepage), White House Office of the Press Secretary 

"'Intelligence' and the Invasion of Iraq," ZNet, April 1, 2005
"Question of the Moment," ZNet, December 7, 2006

   

Person

War on Terrorism

By Kissenger, Clark at Dec 15, 2006 14:53 PM

The goal of the War in Iraq is presently reflected in the price of OIL - $62.23. Today OPEC announced it will cut production to sustain the price established by The New World Order that is in control of the Global Supply of Oil.

911 leading to "The Global War on Terrorism" leading to the illegal War in Iraq was all started for the benefit of Saudi Arabia and the Royal Family, creating terrorist to destabilize the world's supply of Oil, and driving up the price. We should have invaded Saudi Arabia, then one could argue it was done to "enhance the wealth and power" of all Americans. Instead, The Royal Family, put in place by the British, is left in control of 40% of the World's endowment of Oil, the true weapon of mass destruction.  

All US citizens represented by Politicians are collectively responsible with the Auto Industry, GM - Ford- Chrysler and Big Oil, Mobil - Exxon - Chevron for not dealing with the reality of our shrinking Oil reserves and Increasing Pollution caused by huge gas guzzling cars and Suvs. OPEC fired one over our bow in the 70's. American arrogance and leadership failed to respond.

What OPEC learned and continues to learn is that the demand for Oil and energy are growing increasingly more inelastic as the world turns to capitalism. From a Global Economics perspective they are in a good place. The price will be set to maximize the Profit to the Royal Family.  $100 - $200 a barrel Oil is in our future.

Mission Accomplished - Bush betrayed all of us.  The real cost of the pervasive political corruption witnessed and condoned by my fellow Americans over the last 35 years is in the ten of trillions of $$$$$$$.

America is technically bankrupt, by 2020 it will know what that means, as our government prints cash to pay its bills. 

Reply this comment


Person

ARROGANCE....strong feeling of self-importance expressed by

By Russell, Mariam at Dec 08, 2006 11:03 AM

treating other people with contempt or disregard.

We are dealing with a family who think they are destined to rule, born to rule, so whatever they do is correct or at least excusable as a temporary mis-step. These people are not open to reason. Baker was not sent to reason. He was sent to manipulate....the American Public into thinking that an answer to the PROBLEM OF IRAQ has been formulated, and Bush 2 and Co. into doing just enough to quiet the American Public so that the Bushes do not lose out entirely.

 But, read their lips, the presence in and control of Iraq is not negotiable!!!!!!! 

It is like dealing with the seriously insane. First you have to realize that they do not think like you or me.

 

DO YOU THINK IF WE STARTED A MAYFLOWER FUND AND COLLECTED ENOUGH, THEY MIGHT BE PERSUADED TO MOVE TO THE FARM IN PARAGUAY? DADDY, MAMA, BROTHERS, SISTERS, COUSINS TO THE 21ST UNCLES, AUNTS, GRANDMAS, GRANDADDIES, DOGS, CATS, CANARIES. AND MAYBE BEST FRIENDS LIKE CHENEY, RUMMY, MISS TEETH, AND ALL THE OTHER CAST OF STRANGELOVE-LIKE CHARACTERS.    

Reply this comment


Person

Who really holds the cards?

By Kissenger, Clark at Dec 08, 2006 09:59 AM

Everyone in Washington including the President, Democrats and Republicans, as well as the media (including the reporter linked above - great article by the way) talk about Iraq as if the Dark One and His Minions, have the final say on Iraq's future. Not so. I have a bit of news that has been circulating for some time in the alternative news media - America has LOST the WAR. They fucked up. Big time. L O S T. They just don't realize that yet. The actual fate of Iraq is now in the hands of the Iraqi militias (Shiites, Kurds and Sunnis), not the Iraqi government and not Al Qaeda. Not Iran. Not Syria. For the first time in hundreds of years, the people of Iraq have their future in their hands and no one else's. And no one will solve this problem for them - it's theirs and theirs alone. They have played an extraordinarily intelligent game and have won. It's only a matter now of how they play the end game and how long it takes given the arrogance, the intransigence and the stupidity of their enemies. Advice to America, UK and others, including Iran and Syria. Get out. Get out NOW, TODAY, and leave these people to resolve Iraqi issues themselves. Or you yourselves will be caught up in a fire you cannot extinguish. Or, as the hollow-faced Iraqi Study Group has said, events will overtake you. To paraphrase something bin Laden said once - America has taken hold of a fire she can neither hold onto nor release. Some say he said that in regards to the Iraqi invasion. I prefer to think that he said that with the bigger picture in mind - that America has declared herself the enemy of the Muslim world by that act and by continuing to support Israel - and that in doing so, she will be consumed as an Empire.

Reply this comment


Person

Taibbi Column on Baker Panel

By Ajit, Ajit at Dec 08, 2006 02:51 AM

 

Here is one of the best and sarcastic piece on Baker Panel by Matt Taibbi on Rolling Stone.

http://tinyurl.com/ymsrcu,

Reply this comment


Person

Best Summary

By Ajit, Ajit at Dec 08, 2006 02:08 AM

 

The third paragraph is the best summary of Baker Hamilton Report I have read. There is this silly talk of inviting Iran and Syria to a regional conference. It seems the arrogance of washington hoodlums knows no bounds. I mean they think they can threaten attack on syria and Iran whenever they want and invite them to talks whenever it suits them. Iranians are not fools. They have no interest in helping Bush Gang to extricate themselves. And more importantly they have no effective control on Iraqi Shias leave alone Sunni Insurgency. Sadr is actually anti Iranian.

I am not sure of Syria. Sy Hersh said recently that Bashar is writing letters to Bush promising help and calling for working together. But Bush (Read Cheney) is arrogantly dismissing Bashar's conciliatory moves. Bush Hoodlums are intent on shooting their foot into their mouth.



Reply this comment

Loading_border