Race and 2012: What Too Few Progressives are Prepared to Discuss
In the context of the criticisms that many of us have of the Obama administration for what it has not accomplished, for its advance of a corporate agenda and for the unacceptable compromises it has made with the Republicans, there is something that I have seen few progressives address. To borrow from a comment offered by television commentator Tavis Smiley, the 2012 elections are likely to be the most racist that most of have seen in our life-times. Given this, what are the implications?
It has been striking that many progressives, particularly those who have not only written off President Obama but also written off all of those who offered critical support to the Obama campaign in 2008, have said so little about race, racism, and the discourse of right-wing populism in the context of the upcoming elections.
We have witnessed the first Black president of the United States questioned about his citizenship and birthplace, yet I have seen precious little from many friends on the left side of the aisle (particularly those so critical of Obama) responding to this. If you put your ear to the ground, however, you hear the murmurings of Black Americans furious that Obama was put in a place where he had to file a petition in order to obtain his Hawaii birth certificate. The murmurings do not stop there. When Donald Trump and other opportunists started asking questions about how it was that Obama got into Columbia University and Harvard Law School (i.e., was he REALLY qualified to have gotten into those schools), for most of us enough was enough. Because this was no longer about Obama and it had very little to do with criticisms of Obama and his policies.
The white nationalist backlash is using Obama as the target but they are attempting to create a white united front to, in their minds, take back the United States. Part of this agenda means delegitimizing the democratically elected President, but it also goes towards tampering with election laws and voting processes in state after state.
In case you have not noticed, in many states where there is a Republican majority in control, efforts are underway to restrict voting, whether by further limiting ex-felons from voting, to eliminating same-day voter registration, to the demand for picture identifications at the time of voting, to the shortening of periods of early voting. The objective is to reduce the potential anti-Republican electorate. This is being done by demagogically and inaccurately crowing about alleged voter fraud. But this happens through the Right racializing alleged voter fraud. In other words, as opposed to a discussion about real voter theft, e.g., the Republican theft of the 2000 election, the right-wing uses black and brown characters as the way of convincing segments of the white populace that something needs to be done otherwise these colored peoples will be taking over.
The racist attacks on Obama, then, fuse with the larger right-wing narrative: the United States of America is being lost to white people. This has been the core of the Birther message, but it has also been the core of the attacks that contributed to the collapse of ACORN, as well as the blitzkrieg effort of the Right to overturn voting rights. In its more extreme version it is the core of the message that comes out of the fascist and semi-fascist movements among white nationalists such as the sovereign Citizens (the subject of a segment of the May 15th episode of 60 Minutes).
What we are witnessing is disturbingly similar to the period of the overthrow of Reconstruction and the building of the Jim Crow segregationist system in the South. Appealing to fears among whites, and in a frantic effort to destabilize any efforts at unity between the black and white poor in the South at the end of the 19th century, white Southern elites moved an agenda of voter disenfranchisement, hiding behind various coded concerns, such as the literacy of the electorate. African Americans were completely disenfranchised and, quite ironically, so were many poor whites.
Despite our knowledge of history and awareness of the antics of white right-wing populism, few progressives are discussing the implications of any of this for the 2012 elections. The implications, it would seem to me, are quite profound, and range from what does this mean about HOW to criticize the Obama administration, to how to ensure that the elections are not outright stolen by the white Right.
Just to be clear before some of my critics start yelling that “…Fletcher is covering for Obama…”, this column is about racial politics in the U.S. The particular flashpoint happens to be Obama but what is at stake, as I have attempted to elaborate, is far more than the political future of a corporate liberal president. Silence on the part of progressives in the face of this situation, despite our own legitimate criticisms of Obama, misses the larger picture. Yes, we must criticize Obama; yes, we must push this administration; yes, we must protest any retrograde domestic or foreign policies. But, at the end of the day, we need to be discussing how this is done in the context of fighting a white, right-wing populism that is arguing that Obama is an alien and that he [and the changing demographics of the USA] represents the end of the white ‘American Dream.’ We should have no illusions that the Republican candidate for the Presidency, irrespective of who gets it, will center their campaign on anything but this one, critical message.
I think that it is time to talk about strategy and tactics in the fight for power and against the Right, and not only about matters of policy. Politics is dirty, but it is also very complicated, that is, if one exists in the real world rather than in one’s own playpen.
Bill Fletcher, Jr. is an editorial board member of BlackCommentator.com, Senior Scholar with the Institute for Policy Studies, immediate past president of TransAfrica Forum, and the co-author of Solidarity Divided.
ZNet Articles
ZMag Articles
ZCommentaries
ZVideos
Blog Posts
Books
Countering racist propaganda is important
By H, Sally at May 25, 2011 23:58 PM
Progressives and radicals could learn much by effectively countering propaganda campaigns by the ruling elite. Since at least the end of WWII, the powerful and wealthy have benefited from creative and effective exploitation of psychology and social science. Their recent efforts, such as convincing Americans that Obama was foreign born or that all Arabs want to kill non-Moslems, are both laughable in their simple mindedness and infuriating in their success. It may satisfy us to dismiss them as the “sideshow ravings of the utterly ignorant and racist minority” as one comment to this article did. But perhaps the puppet masters behind the raving ignoramuses are crazy as foxes. Let us try to better understand them and all the methods they use to tighten their grip, or we will be continually baffled by their ability to hold on. Condemning the deluded masses to the “last circle of hell,” as one comment suggested, is unlikely to help. We might reflexively grumble that these partisan political skirmishes are too stupid to be important, but if that’s true why are we so angered by them? We all know of the importance of ideas as well as objective material conditions in forming political awareness; some ideas are more entrenched and more important than others in maintaining oppression. Racism is one of the biggest. Tactics such as denying Obama’s citizenship and implying that he didn’t deserve admission to college threatens his reelection, but its importance goes beyond that immediate impact. If Obama’s reelection bid fails in part because a significant number of white voters harden their racist stance, it will be a step backward politically. In any case, a progressive or radical movement worth its salt will have thoughtful and imaginative ways of countering ruling propaganda of many types, and will be able to do without losing their larger purpose.
Reply this comment
You bet.
By Shepherd, Lester at May 19, 2011 23:29 PM
Also. You should live in the South. All whites here think all blacks are lazy good for nothings that are responsible for America's decline. The fact none of them can get a decent job means nothing to these fruitcakes. The blacks are to blame for ALL problems. It is a shame but true which is why I cannot abide the elites like Lewis, Oprah and others. They are a most most pathetic bunch because they need to do something. The last circle of Hell is where they belong if they do not shape up.
Reply this comment
really?
By Pienkowski, Martin at May 19, 2011 22:59 PM
So we need to take the sideshow ravings of the utterly ignorant and racist minority into account when criticising Obama? Really?
Fight racism? YES!
Do it in the context of re-electing Obama? WHY? Obama is an amoral hypocrite. He is not worth fighting for. The left should focus on building alternative movements, supporting progressive members of congress, etc., not on the "issue" of Obama's birth certificate.
Reply this comment
What is "white"?
By Rissler, Michael at May 19, 2011 13:29 PM
Bill Fletcher is making a powerful and true point. In historical cycles that sometime may be like a very large circle that takesyears or decades to transit, we can appear to make substantial progress over racial discrimination, just as we can appear to make large strides in modifying the U.S.'s violent, war-making culture and mentality. In the 60's and 70's I believed that the experience of the Viet Nam invasion was going to be the kind of turning point that would utterly change what this country would do in the world. In some ways it did, but my hope was that we would no longer use war to establish U.S. hegemony. How wrong I was, tactics can sometimes change, strategies are another matter and as a country, Kissinger-like perspectives still rule. (Names change, regimes don't necessarily.)
It is the same with race, there have been changes, of course, but for many, not to be white is not to be equal, no matter how much some laws may change.
Nonetheless, I feel that the effort to maintain white supremacy in both covert and overt ways is a losing battle. In spite of its economic power and general domination, white is weak throughout the world in various ways, certainly psychologically, and fear is the base of white supremacy in all its forms, some of which can seem quite amiable at times, even charitable. Condescension is like that.
To say this, however, in no way suggests any acceptable complacency, thinking that such weakness is in itself enough. The weak often resort to various kinds of weapons to "even things up," to compensate. And the toll that is taken in terms of injustice, personal injury, discrimination, and social inequality can be great. A human life is precious regardless of its color, culture, nationality, and in any other way we might individualize or perceive one another.
Reply this comment