Race, Gender, & Occupy

At a recent panel discussion on the Occupy movement, a left-leaning professor from New York University speculated that identity politics—the prioritizing of issues of race and gender in movements for justice—could be a plot funded by the CIA to undermine activism. While most commentators do not go this far, the idea that activists who focus on these issues are “undermining the struggle” has a long history within progressive organizing. And in Occupy encampments around the country, these debates have often exploded into public view. 

For the past six months, we have been following the Occupy movement for a documentary on Occupy. We have spent weeks in conversation with activists as they have planned actions and struggled to keep their movement relevant through a cold winter. And organizers have told us repeatedly that they feel these discussions around race and gender, far from weakening the movement, have given it strength and made organizing more accountable to the communities most affected by the economic crisis. 

The process of challenging structural oppression has been difficult. We spoke to many women and people of color who felt pushed out of Occupy. Some activists, already bruised by dismissive media coverage, tried not to let these conflicts show. When internal conflicts would arise they tried to not let it happen on camera. But what we did observe were many fiercely intelligent activists dedicated to waging these struggles within Occupy and strengthening the movement with their work.   

The 99 Percent 

When people first gathered in Zuccotti Park on September 17, 2011, the anger at corporate greed was a unifying call. This was a protest that in large part was about shifting power from the wealthy to the many. It was a mostly white crowd, but it sought to incorporate a wide range of voices. The economic crisis in the U.S. had made the white middle class question its future. Soaring unemployment rates, suffocating student loan debt, and thousands of foreclosures began to close in. 

Organizers told us they immediately saw the next step needed was to raise awareness among the many young people new to activism that were flocking to occupations. “It’s the job of the social justice movement to continue that conversation,” says Max Rameau, a co-founder of Take Back the Land, who has advised many of the encampments. 

He told us that occupiers need to “make sure this isn’t just a movement of the way white people have gone from being able to shop every day at particular malls and now have to shop at reduced, discount stores…. This has to do, really, with inequality and long-term inequality, including communities who have suffered for years, not just because of the recent economic downturn.” 

Many women reported harassment in the camp and even assault—especially those that stayed overnight. “I think there were some Occupy camps that allowed homophobia and sexism to thrive in a really significant way,” says Rameau. 

Jack Bryson, a 49-year-old Black public service worker, became an activist after his sons witnessed the killing of their friend Oscar Grant at the hands of transit police in Oakland. When he heard that Occupy Oakland had named their camp Oscar Grant Plaza, he came to check it out. He was excited by what he found, but also thought many young white activists he met had a lot to learn about poverty and repression. “The black community, for 400 years, [have] always been the 99 percent,” Bryson said. “Welcome to our world.” 

Bryson was one of many who told us that Occupy activists needed to understand the ways in which communities of color experience the criminal justice system. He noted that Occupy Oakland had faced intense police repression. But, he told us, what many failed to realize was that police brutality is a daily fact of life in many communities. “Black, young men…would love to come out here. But what happens here with the police? It happens on Saturday nights to Black young men leaving a nightclub or a black young man going into a gas station and being followed by the police.” 

Boots Riley, a hip-hop artist and Occupy Oakland organizer, told us that he hopes the Occupy movement can challenge the ways that people have viewed policing. “I think that what happens normally is the media has most of white America looking at people of color as deficient, savage, and when they see something happen to them by police they believe that it was somehow their fault,” says Riley. “Our ideas and views about the police are very tied in to our ideas and views about why people are poor.” 

If OWS wanted to be a movement that was going to shift power in the U.S., these organizers felt it had to come to terms with the fundamental differences in the ways that communities of color experienced racism, how women experienced patriarchy, and how queer and transgender communities experienced homophobia and gender bias. If Occupy Wall Street wanted to talk about envisioning an alternative community, activists would first have to face their own privilege. 

That awareness has involved active engagement by white anti-racists, as well as activists of color who are committed to the movement. “I was totally impressed by the leadership that was coming from young people of color, young women of color,” activist and scholar Angela Davis told us in a conversation about Occupy camps she visited on the East coast. “I think it’s good that there’s some white men getting involved, but they also have to recognize that, in order to be involved in this campaign of the 99 percent against the one percent, we have to recognize that the 99 percent is hierarchically developed by itself.” 

For Lisa Fithian, one of many white activists who seek to challenge race and gender bias in the movement, this consciousness raising is a crucial part of struggling for justice. “What I teach is that those with more privileges—whether because of the color of your skin, your gender, your education, whatever—how do you use those privileges strategically to raise those of all? We have to take our privileges and use them to actively change the social relationships, and access, and availability of resources.”