Santana is Booed for Using Baseball's Civil Rights Game to Speak Out for Civil Rights
Major League Baseball’s annual Civil Rights Game was poised to be a migraine-inducing exercise in Orwellian irony. Forget about the fact that Civil Rights was to be honored in Atlanta, where fans root for a team called the Braves and cheer in unison with the ubiquitous "tomahawk chop."
Forget about the fact that the Braves have been embroiled in controversy since pitching coach Roger McDowell aimed violent, homophobic threats at several fans. Forget that this is a team that has done events with Focus on the Family, an organization that is to Civil Rights what Newt Gingrich is to marital fidelity.
The reason Atlanta was such a brutally awkward setting for a Sunday Civil Rights setting, was because Friday saw the Governor of Georgia, Nathan Deal, sign HR 87, a law that shreds the Civil Rights of the state’s Latino population. Modeled after Arizona’s horrific and unconstitutional SB 1070, HR 87 authorizes state and local police the federal powers to demand immigration papers from people they suspect to be undocumented. Those without papers on request will find themselves behind bars. Civil rights hero, Atlanta’s John Lewis has spoken out forcefully against the legislation saying “This is a recipe for discrimination. We’ve come too far to return to the dark past."
But there was Major League Baseball commissioner Bud Selig, celebrating civil rights in the Georgia, and chortling excitedly about the 2011 All-Star game in Arizona. In the hands of Selig, irony becomes arsenic. Thank God that Commisioner Selig was stupid enough to choose the Civil Rights Game to honor, among others, the great musician Carlos Santana. Santana was supposed to be the Latino stand-in, a smiling symbol of baseball’s diversity. And maybe, he would even play a song!
But Bud picked the wrong Latino. Carlos Santana took the microphone and said that he was representing all immigrants. Then Santana added, "The people of Arizona, and the people of Atlanta, Georgia, you should be ashamed of yourselves." In a perfect display of Gov. Nathan Deal’s Georgia, the cheers quickly turned to boos. Yes, Carlos Santana was booed on Civil Rights Day in Atlanta for talking about Civil Rights.
Then in the press box, Santana held an impromptu press conference where he let loose with an improvised speech to rival one of his virtuoso guitar solos. He said, "This law is not correct. It's a cruel law, actually, This is about fear. Stop shucking and jiving. People are afraid we're going to steal your job. No we aren't. You're not going to change sheets and clean toilets. I would invite all Latin people to do nothing for about two weeks so you can see who really, really is running the economy. Who cleans the sheets? Who cleans the toilets? Who babysits? I am here to give voice to the invisible."
He went on to say, "Most people at this point they are either afraid to really say what needs to be said, this is the United States the land of the free. If people want the immigration law to keep passing in every state then everybody should get out and just leave the American Indians here. This is about Civil Rights."
Where was Bud Selig during all this drama? It seems that Selig slunk out of a stadium backdoor in the 5th inning. If there is one thing Bud has become an expert at, it’s ducking his head when the issues of immigration, civil rights, and Major League Baseball collide. If Selig really gave a damn about Civil Rights, he would heed the words of Carlos Santana. He would move the 2011 All-Star Game out of Arizona. He would recognize that the sport of Jackie Robinson, Roberto Clemente and Curt Flood has an obligation to stand for something more than just using their memory to cover up the injustices of the present. If Bud Selig cared about Civil Rights, he would above all else, have to develop something resembling a spine. But if Bud is altogether unfamiliar with the concept of courage, he received one hell of an object lesson from Carlos Santana.
Dave Zirin is the author of “Bad Sports: How Owners are Ruining the Games we Love” (Scribner) and just made the new documentary “Not Just a Game.” Receive his column every week by emailing dave@edgeofsports.com. Contact him at edgeofsports@gmail.com.




Santana was wrong about immigration regarding jobs
By Addison, Michael at May 23, 2011 05:07 AM
"People are afraid we're going to steal your job. No we aren't. You're not going to change sheets and clean toilets. I would invite all Latin people to do nothing for about two weeks so you can see who really, really is running the economy. Who cleans the sheets? Who cleans the toilets? Who babysits?"
Um... did hotels not change sheets and clean toilets in the 50's and 60's? I wasn't alive then, but I'm guessing poor white women largely did those things; there are still plenty of poor white women in the USA. Businesses here prefer to use migrant labor because they can, in doing so, get around minimum wage in many cases. Since many or even most low-paying jobs are necessary and not gratuitous (sheets must be cleaned, whether at $8 an hour or $5), the result of increased migrant labor is that some formally employed "natives" either lose their jobs or are unable to bargain for wage increases.
Economics as a dicipline is largely a propoganda tool, since nearly every economist one would ever see or hear ignores or belittles "externalities" and questions of sustainability. However, I have to agree with the party line here, that an increase in the labor supply leads to a decrease in average wages. Business owners and capitalist financiers will pretty much pocket the difference in wages between what they pay migrants and what they would have payed others given their absence in the labor market. If anyone disagrees with my assessment here, please comment.
The problem as I see it is that citizens of the USA do have it better than citizens of many nations to the south simply because they are citizens of the USA; its like they're in a dysfunctional union, you might say. Immigration puts downward pressure on working class wages just as an influx of scabs can undercut a unions bargaining position. There is no financial motivation for a union to take on additional employees beyond a certain point, because each new hire will yield less marginal profit to be divided amongst the existing membership. Those in the union are incentivized to circle the wagons and reject solidarity with those outside the union wanting in, incentivized to cut deals with capitalists to lock in their wage advantage. Say what you will of Arizona's and Georgia's immigration bills, they are true examples of national populism.
I would like to see equitable renumeration for all workers everywhere, but that's simply not in the lexicon of contemporary capitalism. In the short term, well-off folks who make light of the realities of immigration in this system will only cause more problems for whatever left exists. The long term solution is low-interest loans to foreign countries, protectionism of emerging markets, the elimination of free trade agreements, forgiveness (or abscondance) of foreign debt, and increased democracy in impoverished countries. I don't see any short term solutions that don't pit poor whites against poor migrants in a battle for scrapes from master's table...
Reply this comment
free education
By Vester, Brian at May 22, 2011 19:22 PM
Reply this comment