Zcom_simple

Hello,

Blogs are a familiar feature on the internet - where users post content in an accumulating manner, with comments, and search options, etc. They facilitate expression and exploration, and via attached comments, also debate and synthesis.


Reading and
Navigating Blogs

Our blogs are quite powerful. Each writer can post, as is typically the case. Sustainers who have the option can also post, however. All Blogs appear in the blog system, and sometimes also in content boxes the top page of ZNet - and always via the left menu of the top page - and can be found via searches, etc.

Commenting on blogs follows the blogs, attached at the bottom, and blog comments, like all others, are also visible in many places that show comments including in the forum system. In addition, the entire blog system gathers content for everyone - but one can look at the accumulating content in many ways.

  • For example one can look at one writer's efforts - so one is seeing what is effectively a blog system for that one writer, or Sustainer.
  • One can also look at the content by topic, seeing blogs that are tagged as being about a certain topic - or place, as well. Thus, when doing that, it is a blog system about a topic, or a place, with many contributors.
  • One can look at only writer blogs, or only sustainer blogs, as well.
  • One can look at blogs for particular Groups, too.

All this is easily done using the left menu. Searches allow even more variables and refinements.


Creating Blog Posts

If you are a Sustainer with permission, and are logged in, you will see a link in the left menu for you to post a blog - and you can use that to post one, and then tag it various ways (such as with a topic or place, or a group tag), and once you do, it is in the system with you as the author.

You can also use the console button to the left to post a blog - anytime and from anywhere in the site, as long as you are logged in.

Meanwhile, enjoy the blogs - and, by the way, if you are a Free Member or a Sustainer with a ZSpace page, of course you can put one or more content boxes on it, pulling blog links of any sort you may want to filter for, for example, by you or by your friends or by others - and by topic, about places, for groups, etc.

Blogs

Stephen Lawrence and the Daily Mail

By Phil McElhinney at Jan 06, 2012


Change Text Size a- | A+

Stephen Lawrence was  an 18 year old black student who was attacked and killed by a gang of up to six white youths in Eltham in south east London in April 1993, before stabbing him while he waited for a bus they shouted racist abuse at him and his friend who was also attacked but survived. The original police investigation was was dogged by incompetence and there was an underlying feeling of cynicism and racism towards the victims. Two men have just been convicted of the murder of Stephen Lawrence but up to four other involved in the attack have still not been convicted.

With the guilty verdict of two men for murdering teenager Stephen Lawrence in London in April 1993 many people are paying tribute to his parents Doreen & Neville Lawrence for their perseverance ensuring their son got justice after eighteen years of campaigning (although at least three men involved in the murder have still not been convicted). 

Also being credited is the Daily Mail, on 14th February 1997 under the headline Murderers the Mail named and published photographs of each of the suspects and accused them of being the killers of Stephen Lawrence adding "if we are wrong let them sue us

Daily Mail editor Paul Dacre has recorded a video  in which he says the "headline had almost subconsciously been brewing in my mind for some time" and decided to run with it when "the coroner's jury had taken just thirty minutes to decide unanimously that Stephen had been unlawfully killed – the victim of a completely unprovoked racist attack by five white youths"  

Neville and Doreen Lawrence have acknowledged the help the Mail played in publicising the case, Doreen Lawrence said "If the Mail hadn’t been publicising what was happening around Stephen and getting it out there, a lot of people wouldn’t have known about the injustice around him as a young man" an Neville Lawrence said "The fact that the Mail – which is a very influential newspaper – went out on a limb for us showed how committed you were to the case. Not a lot of editors would have done that. Not a lot would have chanced it." The Guardian, The Daily Telegraph and the Financial Times all praise the Daily Mail for its role in securing the convictions.  But while Paul Dacre describes the two convictions as "a glorious day for Neville and Doreen Lawrence……for the police……for British Justice……for the politicians……for British newspapers" Doreen Lawrence was more restrained "How can I celebrate when my son lies buried?"

The Daily Mail can also take some credit for the setting up of the MacPherson Inquiry in 1999 (a public inquiry into the original Police investigation) which found the Police investigation into the murder to have been incompetent and officers had committed fundamental errors which meant that nobody stood trial for the murder for nearly two decades; the inquiry also found the Metropolitan Police to be 'institutionally racist'. One outcome of the inquiry was the scrapping of the 800 year old double jeopardy law which meant that a person could not be put on trial for the same crime twice.

However it is also true to say that the Daily Mail, while sympathetic to the Lawrence family, did originally not believe the story was worth much coverage. A Guardian leader column published the day after the Mail's front page accusation against the five men in 1997 claimed "the Mail's coverage of the shameful killing had been somewhat peripheral. The murder was only mentioned in three stories in the last year before the inquest, only six the previous year, and just 20 since the murder was committed". The Guardian goes on to say "while hoping the guilty would be caught, [the Mail] was quick to sneer at the supporters campaigning for the Lawrence family: 'What is not helpful is the gusto with which the more militant of the anti-racist organisations have hijacked this human tragedy…….is there not also something contemptible about professional protesters who capitalise on grief to fuel confrontation?" 

Peter Bottomley, member of Parliament for Eltham at the time of the murder, also spoke about media indifference to the murder speaking to the BBC news channel he said "Some of the police reaction did have a racist bias to it and they weren't the only ones" he then says that a white woman had been shot in Hertfordshire and the shooting received national coverage but when Stephen Lawrence was murdered "there was no [media] reaction at all" and when he asked why "the media said to me in effect 'you know what it's like in south east london'…the media jumped to the same conclusion that perhaps some of the police had"

It later turned out that Neville Lawrence had worked as a plasterer on Paul Dacre's London home when it was being redecorated but Dacre denies this was the reason the Mail launched a campaign for justice he says that it was "the sickening sight on the TV news of those men strutting and staggering as they left the court... swearing, F-ing and blinding in defiance, it was the catalyst."

Img_9835

Corruption in the Metropolitan Police

By Andrews, John at Jan 06, 2012 21:09 PM

Thanks for the article, Phil, and the interesting comment, Jerome.

For more information about corruption and racism in the London Metropolitan Police, I would strongly recommend reading the following book:

Untouchables : 
Corruption, Racism and Cover-Up at Scotland Yard

by Michael GillardLaurie Flynn

ISBN 1903813042 / 9781903813041 / 1-903813-04-2 
Publisher Mainstream Publishing Company, Limited 
Language English 
Edition Hardcover 

I think that the hardback version is currently out of print but I believe that it is about to be re-issued as an electronic book with a different publisher.

Both Michael Gillard and Laurie Flynn worked for The Guardian, Britain's supposedly liberal newspaper. Both were dismissed from The Guardian as a result of the investigative journalism that eventually became the book, Untouchables. They turned over too many stones, they embarassed those in power and, for their sins, they were fired.

Paul Dacre / Daily Mail, Alan Rusbridger / Guardian - is there really much difference between these reactionary editors / rags?

Best Wishes

John Andrews

Reply this comment


Person

Reason for Dacre's support

By Stern, Jerome at Jan 06, 2012 15:06 PM

Some, perhaps all, of what I'm about to say comes from the UK magazine 'Private Eye', which, though not really left wing, is very anti-establishment and is much more critical of officialdom than most of the mainstream media in the UK. You might even say that's its raison d'etre. What I read was that the Mail is usually very racially biased against black people and this is very much down to Dacre himself. Dacre originally intended to smear and denigrate the campaign for justice for Stephen, led by his parents. To this end, he sent a reporter to interview Stephen's father. The reporter who was sent was aware that his task was to turn the interview into a hatchet job on the father. What really changed things, despite Dacre's claim to the contrary, was that during the interview, the father recognised Dacre's name as someone he'd worked for. When he said that to the journalist, the latter replied "In that case, I think it's very important that you call Dacre and remind him of that". Despite the Mail's consequent about turn on the parent's campaign, unlike that campaign, the Mail, which is possibly the most politically reactionary mainstream newspaper in the country, avoided criticising the police role in the case.

The Macpherson enquiry was merely the usual whitewash in which the political elite indulges in such cases to absolve itself of embarassment. The more serious consideration about the case, which the enquiry entirely ignored, was that the original investigation may have failed, not through incompetence, but as a result of being sabotaged by quite senior corrupt detetectives.
Private Eye reported details, some of which were fairly widely known: It was known that the father of one of the accused was a leading south London gangster who had allegedly paid off and pressured another youth whom his son had allegedly attacked. What Private Eye added was that this gangster was formerly a lieutenant of Kenneth Noye, a man who allegedly was the kingpin of organised crime in south east England for many years. At the time of the Lawrence killing Noyes was in prison for a road rage killing. According to the Eye, a lawyer acting for Stephen's parents talked to several prisoners who knew Noyes in prison. They said that the accused's gangster father visited Noyes in prison and asked for his help. Noyes allegedly responded by giving his former underling a list of senior detectives in Scotland Yard who were, or had been, on Noyes' payroll.  

Reply this comment

Loading_border