Zcom_simple

Hello,

Blogs are a familiar feature on the internet - where users post content in an accumulating manner, with comments, and search options, etc. They facilitate expression and exploration, and via attached comments, also debate and synthesis.


Reading and
Navigating Blogs

Our blogs are quite powerful. Each writer can post, as is typically the case. Sustainers who have the option can also post, however. All Blogs appear in the blog system, and sometimes also in content boxes the top page of ZNet - and always via the left menu of the top page - and can be found via searches, etc.

Commenting on blogs follows the blogs, attached at the bottom, and blog comments, like all others, are also visible in many places that show comments including in the forum system. In addition, the entire blog system gathers content for everyone - but one can look at the accumulating content in many ways.

  • For example one can look at one writer's efforts - so one is seeing what is effectively a blog system for that one writer, or Sustainer.
  • One can also look at the content by topic, seeing blogs that are tagged as being about a certain topic - or place, as well. Thus, when doing that, it is a blog system about a topic, or a place, with many contributors.
  • One can look at only writer blogs, or only sustainer blogs, as well.
  • One can look at blogs for particular Groups, too.

All this is easily done using the left menu. Searches allow even more variables and refinements.


Creating Blog Posts

If you are a Sustainer with permission, and are logged in, you will see a link in the left menu for you to post a blog - and you can use that to post one, and then tag it various ways (such as with a topic or place, or a group tag), and once you do, it is in the system with you as the author.

You can also use the console button to the left to post a blog - anytime and from anywhere in the site, as long as you are logged in.

Meanwhile, enjoy the blogs - and, by the way, if you are a Free Member or a Sustainer with a ZSpace page, of course you can put one or more content boxes on it, pulling blog links of any sort you may want to filter for, for example, by you or by your friends or by others - and by topic, about places, for groups, etc.

Blogs

72

Justin Podur's Blog

Web Address: http://www.zcommunications.org/zspace/justinpodur
Bio: Justin Podur is a writer and editor for ZNet (www.zmag.org), part of Z Communications, an alternative media organization dedicated to political analysis and support for movements for social change.... (More)

All Podur Blogs

The Bush visit to Canada

By Justin Podur at Dec 02, 2004


Change Text Size a- | A+
Back from Ottawa. A couple more notes (previous blog on the demos). One, the estimates are out on numbers and I don't believe them. Sure, protesters exaggerate the numbers but I've never felt such a discrepancy. I have decent footage, standing at the front of the march, of the march going by yesterday afternoon. It took about 10 minutes to go by. I have been in bigger marches. But I have also been in marches of a couple of thousand and this was very different. Peter Mansbridge on the CBC said it "certainly was not 15,000". I think it certainly was, and quite possibly more, though it is somewhere in that neighbourhood. It certainly was not 5,000, as the police say - but more. There was a demonstration of 5,000, in the evening, at the Museum of Civilization, where Bush was having dinner (and where Jack Layton was getting 5 minutes with him, 20 minutes with Rice, 15 minutes with Powell, thanks a lot Jack, that was really a very useful thing for you to do. Thanks especially, again, for studiously avoiding the most important foreign policy topic to your constituency. You are well on your way to making that constituency ashamed of your behaviour and your party. I won't repeat what that issue is. If you can make yourself say it, you will have accomplished something), and it was that civilizing influence in Canadian politics, Quebecers, doing it. Two, as I said yesterday, as much as I'd like for us (radicals) to be able to take credit, these folks were not brought out by our limited resources and efforts at outreach, but instead by Bush himself. The Iraq invasion and occupation is simply incredibly unpopular with Canadians, who are also concerned about the erosion of the public sector, privatization, militarism more generally, and 'border' issues, and that's why so many came out. That means there is definitely intense interest in these issues, but no articulate and highly visible proponents for them (thanks again, Jack). Three, I actually saw some clips from the US media on these demonstrations, and got the chance to read the Ottawa Citizen's editorial pages. The hypocrisy is astounding (the usual admonishments about thinking about our jobs before thinking about Iraqi deaths), the lack of a sense of proportion is predictable (the Citizen denounced protesters as hypocrites because they rushed police lines as part of a peace protest. I think the Citizen would have had a case had the protesters carpet bombed Ottawa, sniped at ambulances, used AC-130 gunships, occupied and bombed hospitals, in order to protest the war), but really, the question that comes to mind - listening for example to Tucker Carlson 'interview' Carolyn Parrish is: "Americans: Why do they hate us?" And four. Bush seems to have accomplished pretty much everything he wanted from this visit. If Martin was looking for some hope for getting Canada's meat and wood through the United States's 'free-market' protectionism (ignoring repeated WTO rulings, rejecting sensible ideas for testing the beef before selling it) he didn't get it (and why should the US stop bleeding these industries so that US corporations can take the assets at very low prices once the bleeding has proceeded to an appropriate level, as they are already doing? Canada could remedy this easily, it seems to me, by playing by the rules industrialized countries frequently apply to themselves - protecting the national market - rather than applying to itself rules that rich countries normally impose on poor ones - protected markets for the rich (the US) and open markets for the 'poor' (Canada in this case) - but it just seems that the Canadian elite feels it has more to gain by abandoning a national economy altogether). Bush said he felt like invading Iraq so he did, and he wants Canada's support on missile defense. Martin toasted and saluted Bush, who spent 30 minutes with the Conservative Alliance's Stephen Harper. He then went to Halifax and gave a 'seminal' 30 minute speech outlining his foreign policy for the future. Meanwhile, Canada's ambassador to the United Nations, Allan Rock, was telling the General Assembly that they are too anti-Israel, and that rather than offering cowardly abstentions to UN resolutions against Israel's dispossession and occupation of Palestine, Canada would vote against these resolutions, against minimal notions of Palestinian human rights. This seems to me a signal from the Liberals to Bush that Canada is willing to play the role assigned to it in the US imperial design: to provide a sleazy political cover for the actions of the US and its allies. The US got what it wanted. And while Canadians did remind the government that these policies aren't popular, it seems that the Canadian government is going to need a lot more reminders of who it is supposed to answer to.
Person

Re: The Bush visit to Canada

By Vekey, Tvekey at Dec 04, 2004 18:43 PM

Canada's around face on UN resolution voting, regarding Israel and its occupation of Palestinian land is a remarkable developement. Just whose interest this change will serve in light of the fact that the majority of Israelis in Israel proper and also the Diaspora would exchange land for peace in a negotiated settlement? This goal would necessitate to put pressure on the settler's movement and their right wing allies in Israel, chief obstacles to peace to this day. This voting strategy in opposition of the vast majority of the world opinion equates occupier and occupied and it will not help to promote lasting peace in the region, based on rights and justice.

Reply this comment


Person

By Freezeman, Freezeman at Dec 02, 2004 20:04 PM

Layton is nothing but a smug, morally-superior, closet Liberal. He offers no real alternative. The NDP really needs to take a stand and get back to it's roots. Looking at the number of people with such strong anti-Bush, anti-empire feelings, it would have been a great opportunity to build strong support for the NDP (or any alt party). I'm sure there is someone in the NDP eyeing up that leadership post. They should have made a move.

Reply this comment

Loading_border