Zcom_simple
?1295269164

July 2002

Volume , Number 0


Activism

Africa
Marc Young


none
Silja j.a. Talvi


none
Silja j.a. Talvi


Aftermath
Paul Street


none
Tom Stephens


MediaBeat
Norman Solomon


Labor Today
Jim Smith


Hot Topics
Stephen R. Shalom


Hotel Satire
Lydia Sargent


Corporate Welfare
Bernie Sanders


none
Carmelo Ruiz-marrero


Italy
Domenico Pacitti


Nonviolence Versus Capitalism
Brian Martin


Steel
Joseph Hoff


Fog Watch
Edward Herman


none
Michael Moore


Mideast
Larry Everest


Political Fictions
Joan Didion


Mexico
Sara Desantis


Culture Wars
Michael Bronski


Commentary

There are no articles.

Culture

There are no articles.

Features

Trajectory of Change
Jeremy Brecher


Indonesia
Jan knippers Black


Conservative Watch
Bill Berkowitz


Genetics
Sarah Bantz


Reproductive
Eleanor J. Bader


Colombia
David Bacon


none
Tanweer Akram


Zaps

There are no articles.

NOTE: Z Magazine subscribers and sustainers have access to all Z Magazine articles here and in the archive. The latest Z Magazine articles available to everyone are listed in the Free Articles box at the top of the table of contents, and are starred in the list below. Questions? e-mail Z Magazine Online.

The Export-Import Bank

Change Text Size a- | A+


This country has a $6 trillion national debt, a growing deficit, and is borrowing money from the Social Security Trust Fund in order to fund government services. We can no longer afford to provide over $125 billion every year in corporate welfare—tax breaks, subsidies, and other wasteful spending—that goes to some of the largest, most profitable corporations in America. 

One of the most egregious forms of corporate welfare can be found at a little known federal agency called the Export-Import Bank, an institution that has a budget of about $1 billion a year and the capability of putting at risk some $15.5 billion in loan guarantees annually. Over 80 percent of the subsidies distributed by the Export-Import Bank goes to Fortune 500 corporations. Among the companies that receive taxpayer support from the Ex-Im are Enron, Boeing, Halliburton, Mobil Oil, IBM, General Electric, AT&T, Motorola, Lucent Technologies, FedEx, General Motors, Raytheon, and United Technologies. 

Many of these same companies pay exorbitant salaries and benefits to their CEOs. IBM, for example, gave their former CEO, Lou Gerstner, over $260 million in stock options while they were lining up for their Ex-Im handouts. 

The great irony of Ex-Im policy is that in the name of “job creation” a substantial amount of federal funding goes to corporations that are eliminating hundreds of thousands of American jobs. American workers are providing funding to companies that are shutting down the plants in which they work and are moving them to China, Mexico, Vietnam, and wherever else they can find cheap labor. 

For example, General Electric has received over $2.5 billion in direct loans and loan guarantees from the Ex-Im Bank. What was the result? From 1975-1995 GE reduced its workforce from 667,000 to 398,000, a decline of 269,000 jobs. While taking the Ex-Im Bank subsidies, GE was extremely public about its “globalization” plans to lay off American workers and move jobs to third world countries. Jack Welch, the longtime CEO of GE stated, “Ideally, you’d have every plant you own on a barge.” 

General Motors has received over $500 million in direct loans and loan guarantees from the Export-Import Bank. The result? GM has shrunk its U.S. workforce from 559,000 to 314,000. 

Motorola has received almost $500 million in direct loans and loan subsidies from the Ex-Im Bank. Only 56 percent of its workforce is now located in the United States. 

According to Time Magazine, the top 5 recipients of Ex-Im subsidies over the past decade have reduced their workforce by 38 percent—more than a third of a million jobs down the drain. These same 5 companies have received more than 60 percent of all Export-Import Bank subsidies. Boeing, the leading Ex-Im recipient, has reduced its workforce by more than 100,000 employees over the past 10 years. 

Here are a few examples of taxpayer dollars at work: 

  • The Export-Import Bank has provided an $18 million loan to help a Chinese steel mill purchase equipment to modernize their plant. This Chinese company has been accused of illegally dumping steel into the U.S.—exacerbating the crisis in our steel industry. 
  • Since 1994, the Export-Import Bank has provided $673 million in loans and loan guarantees for projects related to the Enron Corporation, leaving taxpayers exposed to $514 million. The Ex-Im Bank approved a $300 million loan for an Enron-related project in India, even though the World Bank repeatedly refused to finance this project because it was “not economically viable.” 
  • The Export-Import Bank is subsidizing Boeing aircraft sales to the Chinese military. According to the President of Machinists’ Local 751: “Boeing used to make tail sections for the 737 in Wichita, but they moved the work to a military factory in Xian, China.” 
  • The Ex-Im Bank insured a $3 million loan to aid General Electric build a factory where Mexican workers will make parts for appliances to export back to the United States. This project is responsible for the loss of 1,500 American jobs in Bloomington, Indiana. 

On and on it goes. If the Export-Import Bank cannot become a vehicle for job creation in the United States, it should be eliminated. American citizens have better things to do with their money than support an agency that provides welfare for corporations that could care less about American workers.                        Z 



Barry Sanders is an independent member of the House of Representatives from Vermont and a ranking member of the House Financial Services Subcommittee. 

 

Loading_border