The Most Important Part of Going to the U.S. Social Forum: Coming Home
The most important part of going the U.S. Social Forum is how we come home from it. This is true because the Social Forum is only valuable insofar as it helps us build a strong grassroots base at home that is capable of winning demands, gaining, power, and ultimately changing the way institutions work. If most of the value of the Social Forum will be realized back at home, we should approach the Social Forum with that in mind: We should be talking to each other now about how this massive event in Detroit will help us go home stronger than we were before. What skills and strategies can we pick up and take home to others? How can we ensure that the Social Forum injects momentum into the daily political struggles we are engaged in?
Another way to put this: it’s not too soon to plan your report-back. This is especially true given that these times require so much more than a report-back.
Do those sentences sound contradictory? “Plan a report-back. It’s not enough to plan a report-back.” What kind direction is that? It reminds me of the period in 2002-2003 when the U.S. was planning to invade Iraq. My partner and I were heavily involved in neighborhood-based organizing and our two children (ages 11 and 7) were coming with us to lots of meetings and demonstrations. The invasion of Iraq started to seem inevitable and my 11-year-old tearfully confronted me. “Why aren’t you doing anything to stop the war?”
“I’m trying,” I said.
“No you’re not,” she responded. “All you’re doing is going to meetings.”
I couldn’t deny the accuracy of her observation. War was looming, and the adults around her appeared to be doing not much more than sitting around in living rooms and community halls talking to each other. Sure, we were organizing, reaching out to others, educating people about the consequences of war, planning demonstrations, connecting the war abroad with the war at home, etc. But it all looked like not enough next to the horror of war.
Today I rode my bike by another basketball court with another memorial for another murdered African American kid – teddy bears and candles in a circle at center court. Almost 100 people were killed in Iraq this week, 300 wounded, and untold more dying from indirect effects of war. The oil spill in the Gulf oozes on, laying waste to the life in its path. According to Bill McKibben, if that oil had made it through the pipeline to the refinery and then on to our gas tanks, it would have caused no less damage to the planet. Of course, as experts race to contain the oil flowing from the out-of-the-ordinary leak, billions of gallons of pipeline oil continue on their merry way to wreak their ordinary havoc.
With so much at stake, I’m writing about USSF report-backs? It seems like a terribly thin response given the monstrosity of events unfolding around me. Yet the report-back, like the Social Forum, could be a very robust response – so long as we conceive of it as a step towards building grassroots power. The value of any social justice event could be measured in exactly that way: is it helping us grow our movement? Is it helping us see our own significance in the struggle? Is it helping us develop relationships and allies across issues? Is it getting us closer to our short-term and long-term goals? Is it providing a contradiction to the children (and other onlookers) who can see how high the stakes are and are right to wonder if the meetings add up to anything?
Plan the Report-Back: A Short-Term Goal
Most activists who are planning to attend the U.S. Social Forum this year in Detroit are thoroughly ensconced in the overwhelming logistics of planning workshops, transportation, and housing. We are raising money, lining up buses, participating in planning meetings, and organizing people’s assemblies. Inspired by the message “Another world is possible; another U.S. is necessary” and motivated by the opportunity to share energy, vision, and strategy (not to mention party time – check out www.leftistlounge.com ) with activists from all over the country, many progressives are mobilizing significant resources in order to have a presence at the USSF.
No doubt the Social Forum will be engaging and inspiring. But most of us agree that the Social Forum is not an end in itself. We want the Social Forum to be a means by which we can build bigger, stronger, more unified social change movements. These movements, after all, will ultimately be the engines that power us toward this other world (the one that is possible) and this other U.S. (the one that is necessary).
Which is why coming home is the most important part of going to the Social Forum. It’s at home – and only at home – that we have the opportunity to build a grassroots base that will be powerful enough to mitigate the harm of oppressive institutions (in the short term) and replace them (in the long term). What can we do now to make sure the Social Forum services our needs back at home – back in the daily struggle that will be waiting for us after the long bus ride home from Detroit? Here are some suggestions (all gleaned, by the way, from fellow activists here in Boston; thanks to them for their wisdom).
1. Put “report-back” on your planning meeting agenda. I know for many of you, it’s already there. But maybe the more urgent details of booking buses and lining up funding are taking precedence. That is understandable. But here you are, probably a highly functional coalition of experienced activists sitting in the same room together making plans! This is the perfect opportunity to stretch the benefit of this network- and relationship-building moment. The Forum has brought you together. How can the Forum keep you together afterwards?
2. Integrate the report-back into your fundraising pitch. It should help your cause if you are showing funders that their dollars are supporting people to bring the lessons from the Forum home. And that the base of people who couldn’t go will still be able to benefit.
3. Discuss with others what you most want to learn at the Forum. Ask what will most enhance your work at home. Going to the Forum with some learning goals in mind will help you focus when it comes to the staggering array of workshops and it will keep you accountable to the people from your organization who could not attend. You’re the conduit of Social Forum information, analysis, and inspiration. How can you be the most effective possible conduit?
So far, this is probably sounding pretty reasonable. Thinking about the report-back at this point makes sense, it could even aid our fundraising efforts, and it helps us build our organization by feeding it with the energy and know-how picked up at the Forum.
Making the Report-Back Count Toward Long-Term Goals
But wait, if you’re like me, you’ve been to plenty of report-backs, and you’ve left feeling enlightened and moved, yes, but also a little of that post-report-back let-down. Sure, the spirit of the Social Forum is alive briefly in the room, and this can provide no small antidote to the challenges of the daily struggle. But what happens next? What does it all amount to? Does the Social Forum get stored away as a great memory, one of those “events” that brought people briefly together and showed us a glimpse of something powerful and inspiring? Do you go back to the daily struggle newly energized but with no ways of institutionalizing that momentum?
It can be hard to take on that last question because the daily struggle urgently requires our attention; one crisis after another lands in our path. Each one of those crises is urgent. Each one includes lives hanging in the balance. Yet the consequences of NOT knitting ourselves together into some sort of larger movement powerful enough to truly staunch the bleeding and heal the wounds are obvious: the wounds keep leaking and our Band-Aids are exactly that.
So what if we viewed the Social Forum and the subsequent report-back as an opportunity to build a cross-issue movement back at home? What if, beyond seeing it as an opportunity, we actually gave ourselves a mandate – to use the steps leading up to the Social Forum, the Social Forum itself, and the aftermath as part of a movement-building process at home? How would that look in your city or region?
In Boston, here are a couple of goals that are emerging:
1. that we think about how to merge the momentum from the Social Forum with the momentum already surging from local grassroots struggles,
2. that we create a series of post-Social Forum mass meetings – designed not just to report back on the Forum but to continue building relationships across organizations and consider setting cross-organization priorities and strategies to win short-term goals, and
3. that these meetings lead to a one-day conference that helps determine an ongoing way of relating to each other and building our movement by setting goals together, going through wins and losses together, and getting to the point where we could someday set long-term goals together.
Hmm. Could the work we are doing now – the meetings we are attending, the events we are planning, the campaigns and pickets we are organizing – could this work contain the seeds of a 2-year plan, a 10-year plan, a plan that gets us to the point where we are powerful enough to shut down our city? And then, of course, not just shut down the city, not just throw a wrench in the works, but can we be united enough, can we have enough solidarity, can we have strong enough relationships across our differences that we might also envision an alternative to the great mess that we’ve brought to a standstill?
I say yes. We can do these things. We all just have to start. Now. With what we have. In the locations where we are at. One day you’re planning a report-back that plants the seeds for building a movement that can work together on short- and long-term goals, and someday you’re part of a powerful social force that is helping to determine what “another world” looks like. The reason you’ll get there is because you planned it. You started with an event, a campaign, or a struggle, and you saw it as much more than that. You saw it as a step in the long road that leads to winning.
Sound far-fetched?
I had a soccer coach who used to say, “You miss 100% of the shots you don’t take.” So true. But it’s also a fact that random shots are rarely effective. Thus we should be willing to patiently move the ball up the field – with our team, keeping our eyes on the goal – strategic and daring at the same time.
Cynthia Peters, editor of The Change Agent magazine, is a Boston-area writer and activist.



By notme, at May 21, 2010 01:07 AM
Well, to start with, who are you planning to give a report-back too?
One of my problems with meetings like this is that there is zero attempt to involve anyone beside the usual suspects. This is always just the usual useles lefties who come representing their worthless organizations. They'll have a nice party. Then they'll all go back and tell everyone how fun it was. That'll be the report back. Mainly a plea to pay for sending the same person back to the next one so they don't miss the next party.
We seem to have a professional activist class in this country. They have their little organizations, which maninly seem to fundraise to pay the salaries and expenses of the professional activist class.
When the goal for the 'report-back' is to try to build relationships with other organizations, that tells you the problem. For the modern lefty professional activists, building relationships with the other modern lefty professional activists is far more important than actually doing anything.
Here's a question. For all the meetings and organizing and fundraising being done to go to this thing, could you have spent that effort on anything more useful than sending some people over to a big party? For how long as the focus of your local organization been organizing this trip to this party? And, what's the lost opportunity cost of what you could have been doing instead of planning to go to the party, going to the two-week long party, then coming back and telling eveyone how great the party was. Something like this seems to shut down the left in this country for months at a time. And outside the professional activists class, then impact of the last USSF was zilch. Nada. Nothing.
This professional activist model we have in America might be ok, except for the minor detail that the left is as emasculated and useless and powerless in America today as I can think of any time for the last 150 years. Here's a hint for your report back. ... if what you are doing isn't working, do something else? What the left is doing in America today is clearly not working.
Actually, the last thing the left needs is a 10 year plan. What the left needs is to be doing something today that works. If it tries somehting that isn't working, then do something else. When you find somethign that is working, keep doing it. Do more of it. Congratulations, you've now got your 10 year plan. Please don't waste time and effort and hold endless meetings trying to come up with one. Do something useful instead.
Here's a question. How does an event like this engage someone besides the usual suspects on the left. How does an event like this help to engage and mobilize people who aren't already in some little group that they can give a report back too? Because, as long as its the same little club of lefty usual suspects going to this party, nothing's going to be any different. You've got to start finding a way to engage with people beyond the usual suspects.
And something like a USSF sounds like a wondeful place to start. But it won't be. Because instead of people using this to try to organize and engage with new people, its just going to be a big party where all of the usual suspects on the left will get together and tell each other how wonderful they are and basically ignore that politically they are getting their asses kicked ...badly.
Reply this comment
Re:
By notme, at May 21, 2010 01:27 AM
I love the little story about being a leader in the anti-war movement.
Now, there's a claim to fame right up there with being the captain of the Titanic or of the Exxon Valdez.
All they did was go to meetings. Got that part right. Notice how the story ends there. A persecptive comment, but obviously it didn't change anything. The leaders of the anti-war movement still spent all their time going to meetings and did little or nothing to stop the war. Heck, eight years later they still haven't done anything to stop the war except to tell us to vote Democrat because obviously the wars are much better now that they are Democratic wars.
All they did was go to meetings. And they lost that fight and the wars continued. But hey, they still go to meetings. Now they are having a really big meeting. Maybe someone in the room will realize that all of the meetings still haven't stopped the war. Or done anything else for that matter.
Maybe the first thing is to stop having meetings.
Of course, no one who wants their organization to pay for their next trip to the next USSF will dare to say that in their report-back.
---------------------------------------
I read all of the pre-USSF stuff before the last one, and couldn't find a good reason to take the trouble to go except everyone saying it would be fun and wonderful. And afterwards, everyone said it was fun and wonderful. But the last USSF obviously had zero impact. Oh, wait a minute, the left took 20 seats in Congress based on the momentum coming out of Atlanta-USSF. Nope, that would be having an impact. Eveyone coming back and saying it was a fun party is not having an impact.
Now I'm reading all the pre-USSF stuff for this one. And still, no one can come up with one good reason to go to the thing. Ms. Peters obviously can't come up with one, as she's already planning her 'report-back' instead.
Here's a hint from a veteran corporate worker. The useful events, those are the ones you really don't have to think ahaed about what your report-back to your boss is going to be. Your boss asks you why this was useful, and it just flows out of you. The events where you're planning the report back long in advance to try to justify your attendence, those are the meetings that were completely useless and you only went because it was in Vegas and it looked like a fun trip. Those are the meetings where you are plotting your report-back before the trip even begins.
Maybe they should have the next USSF in Las Vegas? It already looks like just a big convention where the usual suspects go have a big party. The pre-event talk sounds a lot like the industry talk before some big Concrete World convention in Vegas, with everyone saying how fun it will be and already plotting their self-justifying report-backs to their boss.
So, here I am reading about this USSF, and still no one can tell me a good reason to go. How many words in this piece, and the one thing she can't do is to give a compelling argument about why to go to this thing?
One key to make it useful. Plan it such that its useful and attractive to people who aren't already in organizations. Plan it to be much bigger. Create a gathering of a million people who come to try to change things, and maybe you'll have something. If you just want to plan a fun convention for all the professional activist types on the left, hold the next one in Vegas. That's were all of those useless conventions are held.
Reply this comment
Re: Re:
By Emersberger, Joe at May 21, 2010 16:14 PM
Hi Mark,
You may be correct in your assessment of the USS. The problem is that most efforts to confront concetrated power over the last 100 years can be sneered at it you make a narrow assessment of what they achieved - even Seattle in 1999 which you've commneted on approvingly. If you take any individual protest or strike over the last 100 years in isolation and ask "What exactly was achieved?" - then the answer will usually be "not a lot" - not on the surface, but the accumulated impact of all the actions was very significant - or we would stil have things like child labor.
That said, it does seem to me tha the Left was showing significant progress confronting Capitalism - enaging in non-violent but provocative actions- until 9-11 happened. Magazines like the Economist were writing lengthy rebuttals of the anti-capitalist movement - a good sign of the impact anti-Capitalists were having.
Reply this comment
Re: Marc
By Cross, Matthew at May 21, 2010 21:15 PM
Hi Marc,
Between these comments and your comments on the interview with AMC and USSF organizers, you've made it very clear what you don't like, including: professional activists, gatherings, events, reports, parties (the fun kind), salaries and expenses, the USSF, meetings, Vegas, and the left.
So - do you have anything constructive to offer, beyond what you're against?
-MC
Reply this comment
Re: Marc
By Cross, Matthew at May 21, 2010 21:22 PM
Hi Marc,
Between these comments and your comments on the interview with AMC and USSF organizers, you've made it very clear what you don't like, including: professional activists, gatherings, events, reports, parties (the fun kind), salaries and expenses, the USSF, meetings, Vegas, and the left.
So - do you have anything constructive to offer, beyond what you're against?
-MC
Reply this comment