"The Same Opportunities as a Kid from the United States"
By Paul Street at Sep 20, 2006 |
|
The latest issue of The New Yorker contains an article by David Remnick on Bill Clinton's career as an ex-president. On page 49 of this essay, Remnick reproduces part of a dialogue he overheard earlier this summer between Clinton and philanthropist billionaire Bill Gates in Cape Town, South Africa.
Clinton had just flown in from the World Cup Finals on an MD-87 jet ("complete with leather furniture and a stateroom")provided to him by a Vancouver-based mining financier named Frank Giustra. He was joining Gates in a Gates Foundation effort to reduce the scourge of AIDS in Africa.
"On the health side, we can expect unbelieveable progress," Gates said of the next twenty-five years in Africa. "Given that time frame, we should expect a pretty incredible continent where a kid born here can expect the same opportuities as a kid from the United States can."
"Well, I hope that's right," Clinton said
- Remnick, "The Wanderer," New Yorker (Sepember 18, 2006), p. 49.
I support all serious and substantive efforts to prevent and reduce AIDS in Africa and everywhere else.
Still, at the risk of seeming rude, I have a question for the former president and the World's Richest Man:
"Same opportunities as" which "kids from the United States?"
* The mainly white silver-spoon ones who live who live in the top 1 percent that owns half the nation's wealth or... the more than one million black kids who live at less than half the U.S. federal government's notoriously inadequate poverty level?
* The ones who can act up and out in every way imagineable and still count on being wealthy for the rest of their lives or... the ones whose "mistakes" and technical transgressions will doom them to repeated incarcerations and the crippling lifetime mark of a criminal record?
* The ones who live in communities with widely available private and public resources - bookstores, libraries, expensive athletic facilities, sit-down restaurants, full-service grocery stores and much more - or the ones who live in hollowed-out ghettoes where currency exchanges and corner liquor/grocery stores outnumber banks, parks, doctors' and dentists' offices and where police cameras and parole agents are more prevalent than legitimate jobs?
* The ones who live (for example) in the northern Chicago suburb of Lake Forest, where median household income (2000 Census) is $136,142, where 60 percent of the adults work in the Census Bureau's most elevated employment classification ("management, the professions, or related occupations"), where less than 2 percent of the children live in poverty, and where public school children are funded at more than twenty thousand dollars per year or.......
*... the ones (for a different sort of example) in the 90-pecent black southern Chicago suburb of Harvey, where median household income is less than $32,000, where 28 percent of the children are officially poor, where just a fifth of the adults are employed in the elevated job category and where children are priced at roughly seven thouand dollars per year (just more than ONE THIRD of the comparable per-student funding number in Lake Forest) under the state's privilege-preserving method of distributing scarce school dollars?
As Jonathan Kozol said of New York area school and living disparities in his 1999 book Ordinary Resurrections, "these are extraordinary inequalities within a metropolitan community that still lays claim to certain vestiges of the humantiarian ideals associated with the age of civil rights and the unforgotten dreams of Dr. Martin Luther King."
I could go on and on...the empirical presentation of internal U.S. disparities is long and depressing, as one would expect in the industrialized world's most unequal and wealth-top-heavy state by far.
The examples I give above are just small parts of the vast mountain of heavily racialized social disparity that lives on and deepens beneath the sickening national-narcissist celebration of supposed American superiority that is so commonplace in U.S. discourse. Our ideologists congratulate the U.S. on shedding its racist and plutocratic pasts while black household net worth falls to 7 cents on the white net worth dollar, while the poverty rate goes up for five years in a row (something that has never happened in the history of the poverty rate) and as the top 20 percent of income earners now receives more than half of all national income for the first time since national income statistics have been tabulated.
As Frederick Douglass told white America in 1852, "your celebration is a sham." And as King said 115 years later, the "greatest purveyor of violence in the world" --- the U.S. ---- was fighting a "war for so-called freedom" in Vietnam "when it does not even have its own house in order."
I am not some kind of a leftist isolationist or "America Firster." The United States has done an enormous amount of harm around the world and would have a moral obligation to meaningfully assist global humanity even if it had never caused injury outside its borders.
Still, the two Bills (Clinton and Gates) and other rich and powerful Americans who are eager to repair "broken societies" and correct "failed states" would do well to take a long and honest look in the imperial homeland mirror, where the elite's global and military obsessions both fuel and reflect the persistence of savage inequalities and perverted national priorities that mock the nation's professed democratic and egalitarian goals.
The Empire also kills at home. Its homeland benefits flow disproportionately to the privileged few but its homeland costs are generalized across society and fall with special burdern on the most truly disadvantaged, who are expected to serve in the imperial armies and to silently suffer the most from the diversion of public dollars to something our policymakers like to call "defense" and is more honestly described by Pentagon insiders as "forward global force projection" - a project that happens to boost the stock values and feed CEO coffers at such lovely public service entities as Boeing and Raytheon.
I will talk in greater detail about these and related matters in a talk titled "The Repair of Broken Societies Begins At Home" in Champaign, Illinois next Tuesday at 7 PM at the Community Church of Christ.




why is "opportunities" such a big deal?
By Kissenger, Clark at Oct 12, 2006 11:55 AM
Reply this comment
better opportunity in venezuela than afrika
By Kissenger, Clark at Sep 24, 2006 23:42 PM
Reply this comment
this above may have seem off topic
By Kissenger, Clark at Sep 23, 2006 01:40 AM
but it seem that the two 'rogue" presidents have a clue or two of what is causing poverty and inequalities..
Link to video of Pres. Ahmadinejad's press conference at the UN
Link to Pres. Chavez's press conference:
Reply this comment
Theatrics
By Kissenger, Clark at Sep 23, 2006 01:32 AM
paul i recall your article a year ago..i say its informative. hey, jdcasten, I just got fell on amandine the bad speech to the UN, wow this time the president of iran has improved in skills and seem wiser ( beats Bush hands down)
it leaves only Hugo Chavez, for us with the theatrics..or the entertainment this time Hugo is in Harlem and he traded bibles..
I think the reasons why these speech speak louds is because of Bush policies on tortures and secret prisons, I think that more and more people are going to awaken to the displayed barbarism.Reply this comment
Speaking of Bill Clinton...
By Kissenger, Clark at Sep 22, 2006 16:09 PM
But then Clinton got into the elite educational institutions and basically soaked up the world view of the privileged. Here's a piece I did about a year ago under the title Bill Clinton was no Champion of the Poor - it was inspired by some snotty comments wild Willy made about Bush after Katrina.
In my experience and observation, people who've actually claimed from near or at the bottom into the middle or upper class --- it happens, not that often, but sure, it happens --- often have some of the strongest tednencies toward victim-blaming hatred of the poor. They look at their own experience and say "Hey, I made it out why can't they?" For some really bitter and dead-on reflections on Clinton's ironic popularity with many U.S. blacks, see an interesting book by the black Atlanta activist and author Elain Browne - The Condemnation of Little B.
Which reminds me --- in the New Yorker article I quoted for this blog, Clinton is quoted saying...no joke..."I know how black folks think." As if African-Americans are all of one mind. Someone could do an essay just on the arrogant absurdity of that statement. Which "black folks," Mr. ex-president?
Excellent points, "Anonymous (not verified)."
Reply this comment
Hello my friend Cyrano
By Kissenger, Clark at Sep 22, 2006 16:02 PM
Reply this comment
Mabey :), Never been to
By Anonymous, Anonymous at Sep 22, 2006 16:01 PM
Reply this comment
What pisses me off about people like the Bills
By Kissenger, Clark at Sep 22, 2006 16:00 PM
Reply this comment
I Like Theatrics
By Kissenger, Clark at Sep 22, 2006 15:55 PM
Reply this comment
Hmmm
By Kissenger, Clark at Sep 22, 2006 15:54 PM
Reply this comment
BTW
By Anonymous, Anonymous at Sep 22, 2006 15:33 PM
Reply this comment
Technical transgression?
By Anonymous, Anonymous at Sep 22, 2006 15:30 PM
Reply this comment
The tweo misguided Bills
By Kissenger, Clark at Sep 22, 2006 13:44 PM
Reply this comment
May the force be with us all
By Kissenger, Clark at Sep 22, 2006 11:00 AM
Reply this comment
Mr Street. The
By Anonymous, Anonymous at Sep 22, 2006 05:40 AM
The Gates-foundation might "ignore steep disparities in the imperial nation" , while USA does not have its house in order.
I bet kids, both in China and Afrika would be happy with the cheaper ( underfunded ), version of US schoolstandard.
If aid to Africa stings your eye thats your problem. If not I am sure you could have found a better example than that of these bills. Here you twist Gates
african engagement to an inability to engage elsewere ( read; USA ). By this
twisted logic, your knowledge of history becomes your lack of knowledge about engineering.
"Unintentional support by way of feeble thinking"
This might be a nice insult, but as argument it is feeble. And as for feeble arguments see the above Streetish drivel.
Then; on a happier note there is scepticism. Go chew gum Chewbacca ! The Sith surely fears your next jedi-move. If the spirit of resistance be this ethereal. Then may the force be with us all !
Reply this comment
Fortune's Favorites
By Kissenger, Clark at Sep 22, 2006 01:15 AM
Reply this comment
re Bill C
By Kissenger, Clark at Sep 21, 2006 20:59 PM
Reply this comment
f Bill C.
By Kissenger, Clark at Sep 21, 2006 18:15 PM
Reply this comment
the two Bills
By Kissenger, Clark at Sep 21, 2006 17:10 PM
Its seem that one Bill is the extention of the other, somehow it fits the US obligarchy of one bad cop to the bad cop.. I think the US is in need to polish its image abroad by extending the good cop illusion.. Most of the world poverty is caused by US imposed war: pay attention to musharraf being threatened to have his country pushed back to the STONE AGE! Is stone age rendition is what is happening to Afgahnistan and Iraq ? isnt this what happened to vietnam? http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060921/ts_nm/pakistan_usa_musharraf_dc
Reply this comment
This is what happens with under-funded schools...
By Kissenger, Clark at Sep 21, 2006 15:14 PM
"Anonymous (not verified)" thinks it corrects me to say that "Gates' statement was a generalization."
It does not. The premise of this piece is precisely that Gates' statement is a generalization that ignores steep disparities in an imperial nation whose elite routinely prattles about its purported mission and capacity to fix the rest of the world even while the glorified nation doesn't even have its own house in order.
"Anonymous (not verfied)'s" strange commentary offers unintentionally supporting verification of my argument by displaying some of the feeble thinking that inadequate school systems do so much to produce.
On a happier note, I agree with JDCasten that Clinton may have been expressing some welcome skepticism but note that his skepticism was about whether Africa could be brought to non-disaggregated U.S. levels and not about Gates' failure to note class/race distinctions within the U.S.
Reply this comment
Dollar Bills
By Kissenger, Clark at Sep 21, 2006 15:00 PM
Reply this comment
Possibly to defend Bill
By Kissenger, Clark at Sep 21, 2006 07:38 AM
Possibly to defend Bill Clinton's part of the quote above, his “hope” expresses a modicum of “doubt” (I believe he was raised in a single parent home on welfare, like myself (I also lived in a trailer at one time Cyrano)). Of course he was a white and also intellectually bright man, and that gave him advantages that others do not have. I know Paul is largely concerned about poor black neighborhoods—but as far as “affirmative action” is concerned, might this be extended to chronically (generation after generation) poor white kids and neighborhoods as well?
I positively agree Clinton is smart, but existed public school and social infrastructures to recuperate him from the welfare system. I also suggest that you also used the public system to get away from poverty.
In canada, the public infrastructure has been eroding since the reformists are pushing their agenda,its difficult even to have door replaced. every years schools has to raise funds to help balance budjets; I suggest canada followed the US..Reply this comment
Gloom and focus
By Anonymous, Anonymous at Sep 21, 2006 05:47 AM
Positive reinforcement can allso work. Though your "Goth"-gloom is a good inventive "to go on and on" as you put.
China invests heavily in Africa nowadays. That is probably part of Gates analysis. Kids in rural China lack the opportunities of their urban cousins, but that is totally beside the point.
You seem to be chewing gum, and smoking cigarettes , while walking in circles.
Reply this comment
Education & Intellectual vs. Physical Labor
By Kissenger, Clark at Sep 20, 2006 23:52 PM
Reply this comment
re : "The Same Opportunities as a Kid from the United States"
By Kissenger, Clark at Sep 20, 2006 21:28 PM
Reply this comment
The Middle Class is At Risk as Well
By Kissenger, Clark at Sep 20, 2006 17:56 PM
Reply this comment